Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2009, 12:55 AM   #361
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Its the top story on ESPN NFL.

__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-17-2009, 12:57 AM   #362
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Mosley is pretty much saying what another poster said here. DS and VC think they can find a Matt Ryan out of Sanchez.

He seems to think Zorn supports Campbell, which goes along with what SS clarified.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 12:59 AM   #363
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
Its the top story on ESPN NFL.

Zorn: "You smell something?"
Campbell: "I think it's Rabach."
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 01:05 AM   #364
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

I still can't get over all this. The Culter trade was going to make me very upset but this will just kill me. I look forward to Redskins football for the entire offseason and I really couldn't take it with Sanchez. At least Culter is a proven QB at this level.

As someone mentioned before the fans freaked out about Fassel and DS backed off, why can't the same happen with Sanchez?
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 01:09 AM   #365
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
I still can't get over all this. The Culter trade was going to make me very upset but this will just kill me. I look forward to Redskins football for the entire offseason and I really couldn't take it with Sanchez. At least Culter is a proven QB at this level.

As someone mentioned before the fans freaked out about Fassel and DS backed off, why can't the same happen with Sanchez?
Because of the people in here who think Jason Campbell is the ONLY problem with the Redskins and the Cult of Colt.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 01:14 AM   #366
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

To me this is not just about JC and Colt. It is about trading up and wasting picks for Sanchez because he won't be there at 13.

I've already accepted the fact if he is there at 13, we will get him but it seems like he wont fall so far. But hey after Quinn, who knows.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 02:32 AM   #367
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
Its the top story on ESPN NFL.

Zorn: Jason, why is that man staring at me?
Campbell: Oh him? Thats Gregg Williams with two g's. He was supposed to get your job....but he didn't. Good thing I got the boss to tell me I'm their qb otherwise I might have ended up like Gregg...with two g's.

Of course this one I couldn't resist.
Zorn: Jason, whats that?
Jason: That? Thats the money you could be saving with Geico.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 03:15 AM   #368
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

BHA, with all due respect, you don't seem to know the first thing about what the WCO really is. I don't think you have any idea what, if anything, makes Campbell a worse fit than Mark Sanchez. I just think you like reading that point over and over again.

The idea that a QB could be a "bad fit" in the WCO is very absurd. It does take some time to develop a west coast mindset. But anyone with a right arm can be a west coast QB. Or a left arm, for that matter.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 03:30 AM   #369
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

They say the NFL is a copy kat league, maybe Vinny and Dan think with Mark Sanchez at QB he could lead us in to the playoffs. Much like Ryan and Flacco did for their teams. the problem is we dont have the Ravens great defense and we play in the NFC East. No way we win more than 6 games with a rookie QB. We can win with a defense that can force turnovers and get 3 and outs. So if the best tackles are not there at 13th pick and we cant trade down then use it on the best LB or DE . If we don't think the LB OR DE is worthy than draft the best RB(WELLS or Moreno). We need to keep our picks and stop trading them away every year for washed up veteran players ( Jason Taylor, Pete Kendal). The front office panic when Daniels went down so we gave up a 2nd to Miami. We have know confidence in our back up players apparently, with D.Evans and C. Wilson who were waiting for their chance to start. Well we know how that deal worked out. The 2008 draft was the most picks we have had in many years. All of our draft picks made the roster except the punter. I thought we were learning to build through the draft. What do you guys think?
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972

Last edited by skins89moss; 04-17-2009 at 03:36 AM.
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 08:01 AM   #370
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
Mosley is pretty much saying what another poster said here. DS and VC think they can find a Matt Ryan out of Sanchez.

He seems to think Zorn supports Campbell, which goes along with what SS clarified.
Mosley's arguably a bigger Campbell fan than any of us here.

But yeah, it seems like what's happening is Zorn is being told "Look, we're not sure we want to make a big long-term financial commitment to Campbell. We're not convinced it's going to be money well spent (remember what I said in another post about econeomy, marketability, etc). So if we take him off the table, who's your QB?"

Zorn: "Well, I think I can make Campbell a good QB. All the other stuff I have nothing to do with. But if pressed, I like Colt but he's not ready. Give me Sanchez"

Blache: "My MLB is older than a lot of head coaches in this league (maybe one actually). And my DEs are older than that. I need help"
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 08:24 AM   #371
Sonny9TD
Registered User
 
Sonny9TD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Because of the people in here who think Jason Campbell is the ONLY problem with the Redskins and the Cult of Colt.
Colt is the cult of personality too. Have you ever seen him throw? Pretty darn accurate. Ever seen Jason throw? Not accurate.
Sonny9TD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 09:27 AM   #372
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny9TD View Post
Colt is the cult of personality too. Have you ever seen him throw? Pretty darn accurate. Ever seen Jason throw? Not accurate.

Really???? Then why did Colt go in the 6th round?? Just because he looked accurate against 2nd and 3rd rate talent doenst mean he is Joe Montana reincarnated.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 09:29 AM   #373
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skins89moss View Post
They say the NFL is a copy kat league, maybe Vinny and Dan think with Mark Sanchez at QB he could lead us in to the playoffs. Much like Ryan and Flacco did for their teams. the problem is we dont have the Ravens great defense and we play in the NFC East. No way we win more than 6 games with a rookie QB. We can win with a defense that can force turnovers and get 3 and outs. So if the best tackles are not there at 13th pick and we cant trade down then use it on the best LB or DE . If we don't think the LB OR DE is worthy than draft the best RB(WELLS or Moreno). We need to keep our picks and stop trading them away every year for washed up veteran players ( Jason Taylor, Pete Kendal). The front office panic when Daniels went down so we gave up a 2nd to Miami. We have know confidence in our back up players apparently, with D.Evans and C. Wilson who were waiting for their chance to start. Well we know how that deal worked out. The 2008 draft was the most picks we have had in many years. All of our draft picks made the roster except the punter. I thought we were learning to build through the draft. What do you guys think?

Flacco didnt lead his team anywhere the defense carried that team and the Falcons run game is what got them to the playoffs and copycat is spelled with a C just for future reference
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 09:59 AM   #374
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Smokescreen, and it's got Kiper fooled too. Good for the FO, maybe get some better value to trade down at # 13 or force someone elses hand to leave us a better player at # 13.

However, if I'm wrong and they move up or draft Sanchez at # 13, mine will be another TV in the shop.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 10:21 AM   #375
BigHairedAristocrat
Playmaker
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins
Many people are like this, I don't understand why such hatred for Campbell. I guess these people didn't see wideouts dropping good passes or our old offensive linemen getting bulldozed during the second half of the season. I wish people would write long threads on why we should draft a stud o-lineman instead of all of this anti-Campbell stuff. It reminds me when Reed Doughty became Redskins enemy #1 and people stopped talking about him when he got hurt.
Its not "hate" of Campbell. He has his own sets of strenghts and weaknesses, just like any other QB. The problem is he doesnt get to use his natural strenghts in the WCO and his weaknesses are magnified 100 times. Bringing on Zorn and his WCO and expecting it to work with Campbell was a horrible decision on the FOs part... which brings me to the issue here"

Alot of you seem to look at this issue from the perspective of what SHOULD be done or makes sense to you - but it completely ignores the reality that our owner is Daniel Snyder and our GM is vinny Cerrato. Im looking at the issue of what we should do given the fact that our owner is DS and GM is VC.

About WRs... yes, his WRs dropped some balls, but i cant even count the number of times Campbell grossly over or under threw a wide open receiver for a short catch. Many times, our receivers and TEs cant get YAC because Campbell cant hit them in stride. While Campbell has deadly accuracy on his deep ball, hes horribly erratic on the short and medium-throws.

Anyway, as you said, if we keep Campbell as our QB in 2009, we absolutely need to give him O-line help. Campbell holds on to the ball way to long for this system and he absolutely needs more time. He won't be successful without a top5 O-line. If we don't give him serious O-line help, were ensuring his failure. (on the flip side, if we select a QB who makes quicker decisions and is more accurate on the short throws, allowing our receivers more completions and YAC, we're fine with the line we have and can focus on upgrading it coming seasons.)
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.50458 seconds with 12 queries