Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Punts vs. Field Goals

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2009, 02:38 PM   #1
Stacks42
Impact Rookie
 
Stacks42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arlington Va.
Age: 48
Posts: 836
Re: Punts vs. Field Goals

can we sign another RB i think we are down to 5 at this point, but we will have 2 punters and 2 reserve offensive lineman
__________________
The NEXT special teams coordinator
Stacks42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 02:44 PM   #2
hail_2_da_skins
Impact Rookie
 
hail_2_da_skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
Re: Punts vs. Field Goals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stacks42 View Post
can we sign another RB i think we are down to 5 at this point, but we will have 2 punters and 2 reserve offensive lineman
You can never have too many punters. Man...the punter leads our team in touchdowns scored.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS"
hail_2_da_skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 01:53 PM   #3
htownskinfan
JUST LIVIN
 
htownskinfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 63
Posts: 4,930
Re: Punts vs. Field Goals

Quote:
Originally Posted by hail_2_da_skins View Post
You can never have too many punters. Man...the punter leads our team in touchdowns scored.
__________________
Make The Redskins Great Again
htownskinfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.60213 seconds with 11 queries