Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Smoot wants Vikings to trade for Gardner

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-10-2005, 10:46 PM   #14
joecrisp
The Starter
 
joecrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 1,501
Re: Smoot wants Vikings to trade for Gardner

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlea
Okay, so he got a big signing bonus, you think he'll see the end of his deal? If you do you're flat out naive.
I didn't say he'd see the end of his deal. I don't think he will, and I doubt Chris Samuels, his agent or the Redskins think he'll see the end of his deal. That's the trade-off for taking the big money up front. The players know that, the agents know that and every front office in the league knows that. It's the guaranteed money and the average salary of the first three years of the deal that the players are looking for. If they get that big bonus, they know they're not likely to be cut during the first three years of the deal, due to the acceleration of the signing bonus onto the cap.

In the past, the Skins have been able to outgun other teams and woo free agents by wielding a big enough signing bonus that the lower salaries during the first three years of the deal were less important. But this year, the Skins had to maneuver around both the Coles fiasco and the potential for cap problems in 2006. The Giants and the Vikings knew that, and both had the cap space for 2005-2007 to offer a little more signing bonus, and significantly more salary over the first three years.

The Skins are paying now for past indiscretions. The front office has indeed made its share of mistakes. But getting into a bidding war for Smoot and Pierce would not have made their cap situation any better. It would have only exacerbated the problem, and would have forced them to make even tougher decisions over the next two years.

But your assertion was that players see staying with the Redskins as a lose-lose situation because they won't see the big bucks the front office promises them. I can agree with the suggestion that some players would rather play for a winning team, but I think the fact that Jon Jansen, LaVar Arrington and Chris Samuels are all still Redskins is indicative of the fact that the Redskins do, in fact, take care of a few of their own (at least as far as money goes).
joecrisp is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.20917 seconds with 11 queries