McNabb out for the Jets

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by mredskins

Are you being serious? no way do I want Clayton for AH, the guy sucks. Plus we are not battling the Saints for anything, we are just hoping to make the playoffs not battle for the NFC title.

Where did CRed say anything about Clayton?

BHA-What we need to do is trade Haynesworth for Chris Simms! Am I right?

Scud-I'm glad he's not playing either

Lotus-Time for Bartel to shine!

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by smootsmack

where did cred say anything about clayton?

Bha-what we need to do is trade haynesworth for chris simms! Am i right?

Scud-i'm glad he's not playing either

lotus-time for bartel to shine!

I say:
LET'S START BART!
LET'S START BART!
LET'S START BART!
LET'S START BART!

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Where did CRed say anything about Clayton?

BHA-What we need to do is trade Haynesworth for Chris Simms! Am I right?

Scud-I'm glad he's not playing either

Lotus-Time for Bartel to shine!

It is being reported the Skins and TB would be good suitors for a AH/ Clayton swap, I assumed he was referring to that, my bad.

[Lotus]

SS and CRed sniffed it out. This is all just a ruse to give our secret weapon, Bartel, some playing time without other teams' getting suspicious. Next stop Pro Bowl for #10!

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by mredskins

It is being reported the Skins and TB would be good suitors for a AH/ Clayton swap, I assumed he was referring to that, my bad.

If Clayton is cut, I could see us taking a look but an AH/Clayton swap doesn't make sense to me

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

If Clayton is cut, I could see us taking a look but an AH/Clayton swap doesn't make sense to me

It would if we got an extra pick thrown in. AH for Clayton is rather one sided on face value. We really need to get back some picks.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Where did CRed say anything about Clayton?

BHA-What we need to do is trade Haynesworth for Chris Simms! Am I right?

Scud-I'm glad he's not playing either

Lotus-Time for Bartel to shine!

[SFREDSKIN]

Kelly is also out again which leads me to think that he is either to going to be placed on the PUP or IR list.

[SouperMeister]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Kelly is also out again which leads me to think that he is either to going to be placed on the PUP or IR list.

I'm just about done with Kelly. He's the second coming of Taylor Jacobs.

[ethat001]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Kelly is also out again which leads me to think that he is either to going to be placed on the PUP or IR list.

Apparently he can't be placed on the PUP list, since he'd have to be injured BEFORE training camp to do this. IR is still possible I suppose. Sucks, I had hopes for him, but now there's pretty much little to no justification for him to be on our roster. If he is, then Shanahan would violate all his rules of a player proving himself by playing in practice. Banks, Armstrong and even Galloway I guess have shown more than Kelly.

Too bad, MK hurt his hamstring at McNabb's camp. The question will always be - did McNabb work his receivers too hard at "Hell week"?

[MTK]

Originally Posted by ethat001

Apparently he can't be placed on the PUP list, since he'd have to be injured BEFORE training camp to do this. IR is still possible I suppose. Sucks, I had hopes for him, but now there's pretty much little to no justification for him to be on our roster. If he is, then Shanahan would violate all his rules of a player proving himself by playing in practice. Banks, Armstrong and even Galloway I guess have shown more than Kelly.

Too bad, MK hurt his hamstring at McNabb's camp. The question will always be - did McNabb work his receivers too hard at "Hell week"?

I think the obvious answer is no. It's MK we're talking about. He's the only one that got hurt and he basically admitted to not warming up properly.