![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: What QB Do You Want at #10? | |||
Jake Locker |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
44 | 34.38% |
Ryan Mallett |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 14.06% |
Cam Newton |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 17.97% |
Other (who?) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 14.84% |
Blaine Gabbert |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 18.75% |
Voters: 128. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: IF We Take A QB At #10...Who Do You Want?
You mean surprise?
![]() Angry, it's called a hypothetical question. To say that you can't ask a question where conditions exist is simply not true. We have plenty of threads talking about the draft in general, who will be there at our pick, who/what position we should take, etc. This thread is designed to look at the QBs only, and there's not a problem with that. If people want to be 'heard' there are multiple other threads they can post in. Keeping a thread on topic is important. If I read through this thread, I expect to find insight on QBs, not debate on if we should or shouldn't draft a QB. Hypothetical threads play an important part in a Redskins off-season and it is perfectly acceptable to post a question that limits responses.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. Last edited by Daseal; 01-17-2011 at 12:27 PM. Reason: Added response to ANgry. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|