![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: What QB Do You Want at #10? | |||
Jake Locker |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
44 | 34.38% |
Ryan Mallett |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 14.06% |
Cam Newton |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 17.97% |
Other (who?) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 14.84% |
Blaine Gabbert |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 18.75% |
Voters: 128. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | ||||
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: IF We Take A QB At #10...Who Do You Want?
Quote:
Evaluation isn't done by sitting around looking at stats. Talent evaluators know this that is why they look at film its part of the reason for events like the Senior Bowl and the combine. Its a controlled situation where the prospect can be evaluated independent of the talent or lack thereof around them. I mentioned how one of the greatest QB talent evaluators didn't even mention college stats as part of evaluation criteria. Everyone knows the QBs because of positional value are drafted higher then grade. The question wasn't where should Locker get drafted the question was IF we take a QB at 10 who do you want? Quote:
Which once again is a blind reliance on the stats. And you're assuming he can't complete passes based on his comp % rather then watching him play. Quote:
One could insert Gabbert's name in place of Locker above and the statement would still be valid. BTW-You seem to value stats correct? Well look at the efficiency. Gabbert and Locker despite the void in their team's talent levels have about the same efficieny rating. I'm gonna let this discussion go b/c its pointless. But, you strike me as someone that really hasn't evaluated Locker at all you maybe saw the Bowl game and looked at his stats and made your conclusions. Quote:
Mizzou has a spread attack and Gabbert regularly only reads half the field. Personally i don't view that as a knock b/c Sam Bradford and many other QBs only read half the field in the NFL. But, if you're gonna knock one prospect for operating in 1 or 2 read system, you gotta be fair. Also, college QBs in general don't make a lot of pre-snap reads. Reading coverages is something they'll learn as they progress in NFL. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|