Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


2011 Senior Bowl Week

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: BuckSkin's What Position Should We Draft at #10 Poll
QB 37 35.58%
WR 2 1.92%
RB 0 0%
OL 18 17.31%
DL 14 13.46%
LB 13 12.50%
DB 0 0%
Trade the pick 20 19.23%
Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-26-2011, 09:05 AM   #91
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
SS, any QBs we havent shown interest in or the Shanny's see as a bad fit? Bad QB System Fit for short = a McNabb.
Well, right now the only QB I haven't heard we shown interest in is Greg McElroy, but it's still early in the week.

At this point, I don't think anyone is really being ruled out
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-26-2011, 09:15 AM   #92
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,175
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Add Dalton and Ponder to the list of QBs Skins have shown interest in
I'd like to think we would show interest in any QB at this point. . I'd be happy with Dalton in the 2nd..
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 09:55 AM   #93
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

The should look at every prospect.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 09:57 AM   #94
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

Locker’s Mobile journey shows how far he’s come | UW Football
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 10:01 AM   #95
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Well, right now the only QB I haven't heard we shown interest in is Greg McElroy, but it's still early in the week.

At this point, I don't think anyone is really being ruled out
Which of course means that our strategy is to draft Tyrod Taylor as our only qb pick in the 5th.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 10:11 AM   #96
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

That's an impressive read, Farrar either has access to some scouting info. or he's very knowledgeable of the position & Locker's career. Reading this really conveys just how difficult it is to evaluate qb's at this level.

It sounds like it's fair to say at this point that with his potential Locker could be the next John Elway. But unless a coach can remedy his poor decisions he might be the next Heath Shuler, who looked awfully good running the ball in DC, but we know how that turned out.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 11:01 AM   #97
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

I do think this draft is so deep w/ offensive and defensive lineman we should be able to fill one if not both of those needs. They'll be a top olineman/dlineman when we make our 2nd pick.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 11:14 AM   #98
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

NFL Videos: Senior Bowl: QBs on set
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 11:22 AM   #99
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,751
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

Good read. I'm surprised that some people are so down on this guy. Yeah he needs work in some areas (who doesn't at this point?) but from what I hear from the analysts out there that I trust, he has a ton of upside and is very gifted athletically. If he's there at #10 I would think the Skins would be very interested in taking him.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 11:28 AM   #100
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,175
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

Locker would be a good pick at 10, IDC what people say he's got all the intangibles. Locker over Newton anyday
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 11:31 AM   #101
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,751
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
Locker would be a good pick at 10, IDC what people say he's got all the intangibles. Locker over Newton anyday
No doubt.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 11:40 AM   #102
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,817
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

So these "headscreaching moments"...the article really doesnt address them, just states them. Im glad he drops back better than anyone there, but the most important skill of the QB is throwing the ball. So absolutely miserable completion percentages he puts up very consistently and the horrible decision making INTs needs to be addressed. To say "mechanical", means project this late in the game. I say the body of work on tape speaks far more than than individual scripted workouts, an all star game and biggest crap hype of all of time, the combine. I really hope im wrong, but if we take him at 10 he could be maybe the biggest bust of all time. At least Jarmarcus had the stats to support the pick, Locker doesnt.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 11:43 AM   #103
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

SmootSmack what's up with your boy Ponder? Apparently he looks pretty awful. I know he's had the elbow issue, but I hear he's telling everyone he's 100%...
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 11:44 AM   #104
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,751
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

Not all QBs have the sexy stats coming out of college, and there have been plenty that did that ended up as busts.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 11:46 AM   #105
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,175
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
SmootSmack what's up with your boy Ponder? Apparently he looks pretty awful. I know he's had the elbow issue, but I hear he's telling everyone he's 100%...

Well I've seen him live in a game and he was awful
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.35373 seconds with 13 queries