![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,831
|
Re: Question about 2000-2001 QB Situation here
Brad Johnson was coming off a Pro Bowl season in '99 and was due a contract extension.
Instead, Danny brings in George which was a clear slap in the face to BJ, and rumors were he strongly suggested behind the scenes that he wanted JG to start over BJ. Norv being the pushover he was really had no choice. A year later Johnson was outta here, and Marty quickly disposed of George after a disastrous 37-0 drubbing to the Packers in week 2 in 2001. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Question about 2000-2001 QB Situation here
Quote:
McNabb and George don't really compare in my mind. George had never done anything meaningful when we brought him in, McNabb on the other hand has a bevy of accomplishments/solid stats as an NFL starter. Everyone likes to talk about Brandon Llyod, Arch Deluxe, Deion, Bruce Smith, etc when they talk about Snyder's big failures. I think the combination of bringing in George while simultaneously turning a cold shoulder to Brad Johnson was possibly the little man's biggest personnel fail. Johnson wasn't going to be a franchise man for a decade, but he could have stuck around for 3-5 more years for us and been very solid. Better than anything else we've had at QB during Danny's tenure.
__________________
Tardy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,007
|
Re: Question about 2000-2001 QB Situation here
Quote:
We as fans look at those years from a win/loss prospective but I bet if you looked at those years and the buzz that was create with those teams from a dollar sign prospective they were winning seasons in Danny's eyes.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,587
|
Re: Question about 2000-2001 QB Situation here
I still think the Arch Deluxe was the biggest fail (behind Haynesworthless). To tell Clark you were done over paying players, and turn around and sign Archuletta to that mega contract was the icing on the cake. Clark wanted peanuts to resign with us. I agree with you that the George move was and has been a horrible move in our history.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Question about 2000-2001 QB Situation here
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Question about 2000-2001 QB Situation here
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,831
|
Re: Question about 2000-2001 QB Situation here
Quote:
![]() Only the Redskins could have messed up that situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Question about 2000-2001 QB Situation here
Seriously, it's amazing how bad we f'd up after the 1999 season. We had the #2 and #3 picks in the upcoming draft, we had just had I think the year before the Saints entire draft... and we were really good in 1999... I mean it's just sad how bad that went.
__________________
#21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|