![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#91 | |
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,011
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Quote:
I say hang in there and as far as McNabb goes no one was really dieing for him so what we got is decent. I think MS would be the first to say the McNabb experiment was a fail.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#92 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
The problem people have with this is that Jarmon was selected in the supplemental draft equating to more wasted draft picks.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.' |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 | |
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,011
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Quote:
Can't build Rome in a day.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Josh McDaniels is a far better playcaller than Kyle Shanahan. I think we need to factor that in when considering the relative value of Jabar Gaffney here. I do think he was a pretty good player the last two years and pretty much just stepped up and flat replaced Brandon Marshall's production without monopolizing the offense this year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
I'd rather see the Skins stockpile offensive and defensive linemen. You can never have enough help on the line. This has been the downfall for a number of years. Too many overpriced, under-performing skilled players and not enough quality line play. Who is going to throw to all these receivers?
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Um, I'd like to point out that Gaffney, over the last two years, has put up the following numbers:
2009: 54 catches, 732 yards, 13.6 avg, 2 TDs 2010: 65 catches, 875 yards, 13.5 avg, 2 TDs Those yardage and TD numbers look strikingly similar to Anthony Armstrong's. Doesn't anybody like depth in their receiving corps? I'm fine with this move. Let the rooks compete with guys like this and see what shakes out.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Quote:
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.' |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
So with 20 some WR's on our roster I guess we could still be in the Braylon Edwards running.
Also when I heard we traded for a Broncos receiver I thought Eddie Royal, but of course we get the 30 year old short fast guy. (see a trend here)
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,598
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Quote:
We're going to sign OL soon I imagine. In the meantime, let's all..... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#101 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Quote:
Can we all look at it this way..... Your refering to a different regime, a regime that was allowed to 10yrs to pull those types of crappy moves. I just wish we all could find a way to seperate the two. Allen has been doing a fine job so far. As a matter of fact I was actually happy to hear that the Skins were well below the CAP and was supprised at how far since usually we are worried about how they will finagle the contracts they already have in order to make room. Then the new CBA comes along and they have to spend a certain % of each dollar on players I figured this will be fun to see how they find a way to spend all the dollars. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#102 | |
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Quote:
Well if they are, they are going to have to unseat a former Redskins' squad where the #1 guy was James Thrash...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Quote:
The Redskins scheme, I think, is more of a WR friendly scheme. Which might incorporate 4 WR's at times, but that could be 2 WR's and 2 TE's, or 3 WR's and 1 TE. So who knows. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#104 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,837
|
It would have been a waste if we had cut him, instead we turned him into a productive WR.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#105 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
There have been a couple of instances where Redskins defensive ends have been cut loose and gone on to have decent careers elsewhere ... N.D. Kalu and Chris Clemons, specifically. Clemons had 11 friggin' sacks for Seattle last year. Not too shabby. Don't know how he would fit in the 3-4 though. It'll be interesting to see if Jarmon does the same thing.
As for all these wideouts, let's look at the numbers from our dudes last year: Moss -- 93 catches, 1115 yards, 6 TDs, his longest was 56 yards Armstrong -- 44 catches, 874 yards, 3 TDs, longest reception was 76 yards. Are these are typical numbers for a number one and number two duo? Here's the rest ... Joey Galloway -- 12 for 173 yards (longest was 62 yards) Banks -- 2 catches for 10 yards Roydell -- 8 for 109 yards (longest was 34 yards) Terrance Austin -- 3 for 47 yards (longest was 28 yards) ^None of these guys scored a receiving TD. Let's face it, apart from the returning capabilities of Banks, there's just not a whole lot here. I'd say we have receiving corps that's ripe for some competition... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|