Lots of RBs, DBs, LBs, but why no DT or DE?

JWsleep · 05-31-2005, 06:54 PM

Matty has it right--there's no one we can get that's worth it, and we don't have the cap space anyway. These guys all will compete for the positions we need some depth at, and--this is a big factor--they all can most likely help on special teams.

And I agree with Daseal about Williams' D--he brings the pressure from all over, and that's not necessarily a bad thing.

(What does "maybe this is me speaking" mean??? Are you not sure that you're you? Could you be wrong about that one, Daseal?

)

05-31-2005, 06:54 PM	#10
JWsleep Propane and propane accessories Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, TX Age: 56 Posts: 4,719	Re: Lots of RBs, DBs, LBs, but why no DT or DE? Matty has it right--there's no one we can get that's worth it, and we don't have the cap space anyway. These guys all will compete for the positions we need some depth at, and--this is a big factor--they all can most likely help on special teams. And I agree with Daseal about Williams' D--he brings the pressure from all over, and that's not necessarily a bad thing. (What does "maybe this is me speaking" mean??? Are you not sure that you're you? Could you be wrong about that one, Daseal? ) __________________ Hail from Houston!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Lots of RBs, DBs, LBs, but why no DT or DE?

Locker Room Main Forum