QB Combo Possibilities: Which Do You Want (QB Rumors: Verse 10)

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Mannings agent might have an interest in Washington Peyton does not, Jets or Cardinals for Manning

And u know this how?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

And u know this how?

Careful deduction and guessing my dear Watson!!!

The jets will give Peyton full and total control in the O and will bring in who ever he wants ,the jets want to win right now(yesterday is not too soon) and deal with the future later. The Skins want to build for the future also with Mannings injury he would be better off in a warm climate or indoors the Cardinals have it all the indoor /outdoor stadium and most of the opponants are warm weather teams.


AND YES THIS IS ALL MY IDEA.....I THOUGHT OF IT FIRST.

[Mechanix544]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Careful deduction and guessing my dear Watson!!!

The jets will give Peyton full and total control in the O and will bring in who ever he wants ,the jets want to win right now(yesterday is not too soon) and deal with the future later. The Skins want to build for the future also with Mannings injury he would be better off in a warm climate or indoors the Cardinals have it all the indoor /outdoor stadium and most of the opponants are warm weather teams.


AND YES THIS IS ALL MY IDEA.....I THOUGHT OF IT FIRST.

Seriously, you guys just won a super bowl. Nothing better to do than come to the 4th place divisional rivals message board to give us your "insight" on our offseason moves?

Kinda pathetic if you would ask me, dear watson.......

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Mechanix544

Kinda pathetic if you would ask me, dear watson.......

Good thing noone ask then.

[SmootSmack]

Reports out of Cleveland are saying Dolphins are out, Brown refusing to give up their 2nd first round pick, and Redskins refusing to give up their 2nd round pick (I had heard refusing 2013 1st, but whatever). Smart moves by these teams. Make the Rams work for it. Everyone knows they're not going to hold onto that #2 pick, and even if they do they're not taking RG3

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Reports out of Cleveland are saying Dolphins are out, Brown refusing to give up their 2nd first round pick, and Redskins refusing to give up their 2nd round pick (I had heard refusing 2013 1st, but whatever). Smart moves by these teams. Make the Rams work for it. Everyone knows they're not going to hold onto that #2 pick, and even if they do they're not taking RG3

IMO great new Lambs trying to get to greedy. Vikings might be wanting less.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Reports out of Cleveland are saying Dolphins are out, Brown refusing to give up their 2nd first round pick, and Redskins refusing to give up their 2nd round pick (I had heard refusing 2013 1st, but whatever). Smart moves by these teams. Make the Rams work for it. Everyone knows they're not going to hold onto that #2 pick, and even if they do they're not taking RG3

Good. No need to rush, let free agency play out and the Rams will lose some leverage right away.

[MTK]

In St. Louis, Redskins viewed as favorites to trade up with Rams | ProFootballTalk

[mlmdub130]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

In St. Louis, Redskins viewed as favorites to trade up with Rams | ProFootballTalk

i don't mind this scenerio, if this were the case i think i would take the risk.

So if the Redskins are the team moving up, they might be able to keep this year’s second overall pick. But they’d probably have to give up this year’s first and third, and next year’s first and fifth.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by mlmdub130

i don't mind this scenerio, if this were the case i think i would take the risk.

Sign me up for that to, I think I had 2012 1st & 3rd, 2013 1st & 4th.

[44Deezel]

Washington Redskins (@redskinsbuzztap)
3/4/12 10:51 AM
CSNWashington >> Report: Redskins won't part with 2nd in RG3 deal buzztap.com/-Cyp80H


Sent from my iPad

[REDSKINS4ever]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

In St. Louis, Redskins viewed as favorites to trade up with Rams | ProFootballTalk

If the Redskins were trading up with Indianapolis for the #1 overall pick, then the compensation of that second round draft pick would be about right in a deal like that. But with the #2 overall pick, Redskin officials are right to refuse to add their 2nd round selection in this year's draft as a part of the deal. This year's first round pick, this year's 3rd round pick, and maybe a 4th round pick in addition to next year's 1st round pick is enough to give the Rams to move up to their spot in the first round of the 2012 NFL draft.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by 44Deezel

Washington Redskins (@redskinsbuzztap)
3/4/12 10:51 AM
CSNWashington >> Report: Redskins won't part with 2nd in RG3 deal buzztap.com/-Cyp80H


Sent from my iPad

If you're trying to post links, it's not working. Just a heads up.

[Bushead]

And that's why I like this new administration. Don't you get the idea that 5 years ago, anything the other team wanted, we would have given away?

[REDSKINS4ever]

Originally Posted by Bushead

And that's why I like this new administration. Don't you get the idea that 5 years ago, anything the other team wanted, we would have given away?

Most certainly. Vinny Cerratto would have given away the entire draft to move up to #2. The thing that I didn't appreciate about Cerratto was he did things that previous Redskin GM Charley Casserly and Bobby Beathard never did. Vinny Cerratto's main failing as Redskins general manager was that he had no idea or no basic concept of team building. This is why from 1999 to 2009, the Redskins only had three playoff appearances, countless losses, and only two playoff victories.