Redskins: 2012 Off-Season-Free Agency/Trades

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Like to share? Or can't

Um...let's see. Two guys have been primarily rumored. One is controversial, the other underachieving.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Um...let's see. Two guys have been primarily rumored. One is controversial, the other underachieving.

Controversial. I would have to say that's D-hall.

[redskins5044]

lets think about how many players on our team right now have any decent trade value? not many, probably Rak, Kerrigan, Davis and Williams.

[redskins5044]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Controversial. I would have to say that's D-hall.

IMO

Controversial-Fred Davis

Underachiever- Trent Williams

[biffle]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Um...let's see. Two guys have been primarily rumored. One is controversial, the other underachieving.

The first is Hall, the second is..... Hall.

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Tony Kornheiser?

lol, i think he probably means the mod at extremeskins. i lost 99% of the respect i had for DC Tailgate after citing TK as a source.

other than Rak, we dont have a single player on our team with substantial trade value. I think we may be getting a little worked up about what this potential trade could be. Its probably going to end up being something uninteresting like trading a marginal player for a late round pick.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

lol, i think he probably means the mod at extremeskins. i lost 99% of the respect i had for DC Tailgate after citing TK as a source.

other than Rak, we dont have a single player on our team with substantial trade value. I think we may be getting a little worked up about what this potential trade could be. Its probably going to end up being something uninteresting like trading a marginal player for a late round pick.

Whoops. Right. That would make more sense than Kornheiser. I'm just used to referring to Kornheiser as TK.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Um...let's see. Two guys have been primarily rumored. One is controversial, the other underachieving.

Well hall is our only controversial imo and under avhiever? Hmm idk as long as it's not TW I'm good

[Ruhskins]

How is Hall controversial? I think thats just in the fans eyes....now underachieving, def.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

How is Hall controversial? I think thats just in the fans eyes....now underachieving, def.

I hope it's Hall, I would do cartwheels if he's traded.

[redskins5044]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I hope it's Hall, I would do cartwheels if he's traded.

Hall=no trade value

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by biffle

The first is Hall, the second is..... Hall.

Well played. Bravo...lol

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

How is Hall controversial? I think thats just in the fans eyes....now underachieving, def.

i honestly dont think hall is "underachieving" - hes performing exactly as he always has and about what we'd expect. i honestly dont get controversial either, but perhaps i dont understand what is meant by controversial - i'm assuming controversial would mean - there would be a controversy amongst fans if he were traded. With hall, i dont think there'd be too much contoversy. I also think the trent williams trade talk is a bit silly - he's only been here two years and we've got to have someone protecting our new QB. the OT market is pretty weak in free agency. we'd be fools to trade Williams at this point.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

How is Hall controversial? I think thats just in the fans eyes....now underachieving, def.

With his shit talking. The calling out of Haslett for him not covering the best WR, only to give up 100+ yards and TD to some scrub WR the following week.


I'd say he was controversial.

[SFREDSKIN]

Underachiever= Barnes