When is Enough ,Enough?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by mooby

Because when abortions are performed those "babies" are not living, breathing people (except in very rare 3rd trimester abortions where the mother was planning on having the kid and instead is forced to abort the pregnancy due to complications or the mother's life being at risk). We're talking a ball of tissue. It's akin to having a fatty lump removed.

My problem with Republicans is you only care about life inside the womb. Once they get out you couldn't give less of a fuck about the circumstances or life they're born into. You have no sympathy for kids born into shitty circumstances or families that need help.

Conservatives like to talk a lot of shit about RBG being pro-abortion, but they forget the name Susan Struck. In the 60's the military actually forced women to get abortions if they wanted to continue their career. Struck was a Catholic who didn't believe in abortion, RBG took the case and forced the Air Force (and the other branches eventually) to change their policy. Think of all the children she saved by doing that. And also reconsider the fact she wasn't on the SC when Roe v. Wade passed.

Post #2721 ,he's a "libertarian now"!

[sdskinsfan2001]

Reply fail. See #2731.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by mooby

Because when abortions are performed those "babies" are not living, breathing people (except in very rare 3rd trimester abortions where the mother was planning on having the kid and instead is forced to abort the pregnancy due to complications or the mother's life being at risk). We're talking a ball of tissue. It's akin to having a fatty lump removed.

My problem with Republicans is you only care about life inside the womb. Once they get out you couldn't give less of a fuck about the circumstances or life they're born into. You have no sympathy for kids born into shitty circumstances or families that need help.

Conservatives like to talk a lot of shit about RBG being pro-abortion, but they forget the name Susan Struck. In the 60's the military actually forced women to get abortions if they wanted to continue their career. Struck was a Catholic who didn't believe in abortion, RBG took the case and forced the Air Force (and the other branches eventually) to change their policy. Think of all the children she saved by doing that. And also reconsider the fact she wasn't on the SC when Roe v. Wade passed.

They are living. How else do they grow and develop?

Huh? You know how I feel about people? I'd rather have to overcome shitty situations then be killed and never given the chance. There are thousands if not millions of people born into tough situations that have made contributions to society that we'd all be worse off without.

I didn't say anything about RBG. But I'm thankful that she did that.

[sdskinsfan2001]

And please come up with something that isn't "women's rights", because at least half of all the murdered babies were women.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

And please come up with something that isn't "women's rights", because at least half of all the murdered babies were women.

Link,please?

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Link,please?

You need a link to know that approximately half of all children born our girls?

[Chico23231]

I tell what’s not enough... Kristi Noem. straight up fox...these gop chicks HOT

[Giantone]

Men need to shut the fuck up about abortion ! Legal , illegal ..........women should make the choice ,men need to stay the fuck out of it.

[MTK]

Trump's Taxes Show Chronic Losses and Years of Income Tax Avoidance - The New York Times

shocker

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by MTK

Trump's Taxes Show Chronic Losses and Years of Income Tax Avoidance - The New York Times

shocker

Shocker this shit comes out right before the 1st debate. Right out of the democratic handbook.

Give me a flat tax or a national sales tax. No fucking write offs.

[SunnySide]

1. New York Times are not Democrats.
2. The tax return issue has been going on for a long time and I read several articles on this a year or so ago that said if trump and Barr continue to fight this it might push the disclosure to right before the election.
3. Not nearly as bad as Fox News falsely claiming Hillary was soon the be indicted days before the election then Fox News walking it back the day after the election.

I’m just waiting for this Durham report which has been going on for 2 years to drop right before elections. I’m sure you will take republicans to task for slow walking an investigation so the report drops right before an election. On an investigation which has already been investigated and cleared.

Politics suck on both sides but one side does it more than the other.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

1. New York Times are not Democrats.
2. The tax return issue has been going on for a long time and I read several articles on this a year or so ago that said if trump and Barr continue to fight this it might push the disclosure to right before the election.
3. Not nearly as bad as Fox News falsely claiming Hillary was soon the be indicted days before the election then Fox News walking it back the day after the election.

I’m just waiting for this Durham report which has been going on for 2 years to drop right before elections. I’m sure you will take republicans to task for slow walking an investigation so the report drops right before an election. On an investigation which has already been investigated and cleared.

Politics suck on both sides but one side does it more than the other.

1. False.

2. Correct, I will. I am way more critical of Republicans than any of you are of Democrats. Hell, I just unregistered as a Republican. The party as a whole has been a complete letdown well before Trump. And on things like yearly deficits/total debt he's just added onto it.

3. Correct, Democrats suck worse.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

1. New York Times are not Democrats.
2. The tax return issue has been going on for a long time and I read several articles on this a year or so ago that said if trump and Barr continue to fight this it might push the disclosure to right before the election.
3. Not nearly as bad as Fox News falsely claiming Hillary was soon the be indicted days before the election then Fox News walking it back the day after the election.

I’m just waiting for this Durham report which has been going on for 2 years to drop right before elections. I’m sure you will take republicans to task for slow walking an investigation so the report drops right before an election. On an investigation which has already been investigated and cleared.

Politics suck on both sides but one side does it more than the other.

Lol New York Times not democrats. They are certainly working as a mouthpiece for the democratic and are a well know liberal biased trash heap.

Certainly was proven last election as Clinton leaked emails had the Clinton campaign chair, too reach out to Maggie Haberman, a piece of trash NYT reporter, to work with her to plant stories for the campaign.

Look it up on google. The email states she is considered friendly press and she had planted stories before at politico. NYT stories are biased propaganda...not believable. Also the treatment of the Steele dossier by the NYT in the Russian collusion hoax disqualifies them as a proper source for any believable content about Trump

[MTK]

Maybe he could have just released his tax returns in the first place, like everyone else normally does

[SunnySide]

lol switching to libertarian doesn’t make you the smartest kid in the room or somehow absolve you of showing party bias.

If you think the New York Times = Democrats ... I don’t know what to tell you. You 100% have the right to shape your world and your views as you see fit. If that’s what you think, a newspaper is a political party ... okay cool.