![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
But if so, I'm confused as to why you open your post by listing some talented players from the Colts' D. Whats your arguement? That the Colts have and have had a better defensive unit than the Patriots? On what basis? FRPLG hits this one directly on the head. If you take Manning off the Colts, you have a really piss poor football team. If you take Brady off the Patriots, the team gets significantly worse but only probably to a 8-8 maybe 7-9 level. This of course implys that a replacement level backup (i.e crappy) would take the reins in both situations. If the question was which quarterback has had the more fufilling career, the answer is Brady. If the question was which quarterback has ultimately been more successful, the answer is Brady. Citing three championships would be a great defense for both of those positions. But if you are trying to answer the simple questions "Which guy is the best?" or "Which one should I take on my team?", you have to look beyond rings to who actually gives his team the best chance to win. 3 rings does crap for Brady going foward. You think Robert Mathis will have Brady wrapped up this week for a sack, only let him go on the context that the guys a three time champion? Not likely. From a philosophical point of view, I think the whole idea of "winning a ring" is BS anyway. Stay with me. Football is a team game. The players and coaches win and lose as a team. A ring is very much an individual award, and to me thats a crappy way to represent a team achievement. The Lombardi Trophy is the most soughtafter trophy in sports. It is awarded to the team who wins the NFL Championship each year. It's a team award given for team achievement. Playing for a ring is, at its core, a rather selfish thing to strive for. In effect, you are exerting effort for personal gain, instead of that of the team. Playing for a championship, and playing for a trophy for your team is completely selfless. If you are wondering, this is a very key reason why I put no value into how many "rings" a guy has. I know that there is little distinction between the two because they come as a package, but the ring would be completely worthless if it didn't represent team achievement, so to use it as an arguement for individual achivement is downright silly.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 432
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
I used to like the Chargers. Love their draft every year. SOmething about Merriman pisses me off and I actually wanted NE to win for the first time in about 6 years.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 59
Posts: 1,176
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Indy wins this year, though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
I figured it out, it's that really stupid 'dance' he does.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 488
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
you honestly think brady is a better quartback than dan marino because marino doesnt have a ring?
__________________
HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!!! LETS GO MOUNTAINEERS!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: somewhere on this planet
Age: 62
Posts: 178
|
![]()
marino had the big numbers because the dolphins never had a running game when he was there.marinio was a good qb,and sure hall of famer,but i would take favre,brady,warner,and a couple other qbs over marino any day!
__________________
Parcells' legacy with the Cowboys can be framed this way: Instead of joining Tom Landry, Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer as coaches who led them to championships, he leaves lumped with Chan Gailey and Dave Campo. (ESPN QUOTE) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 488
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
When Tom brady does any of this... all of dan marino's records, ill say he is better, until then, not a damn chance.
__________________
HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!!! LETS GO MOUNTAINEERS!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
I'm not trying to take anything away from Dan Marino, but I'm not playing fantasy football. If I'm the owner of a team, I'm taking Tom Brady. Tom is the one wearing 3 Super Bowl rings. I'm not gonna sit here and say that no one else could have done it with the team he has around him, but Peyton routinely wastes the talent around him, so you have to give Brady a ton of credit. I'm goin with 3 wins, not a whole bunch of passing records. I'll acknowledge that Marino is a better passer, but Brady is the better quarterback because that takes so much more. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
now having said all that, peyton manning could take his game to the next level next weekend and i will be rooting for him. i'm a fan of peyton and would love to see him win a superbowl but until he does brady will remain better than him when the big games are on the line.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Huh? The main job of a quarterback is to pass. If he doesn't pass, he runs. Surely the reason Brady is better than Marino in your opinion isn't because he's a deadly runner. So if Marino is the better passer, why on earth would Brady be the better QB?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
I don't know what kind of team you are coaching? The job of the quarterback is to lead. To lead his team to victory. Marino was of course a better passer, but no way was he a better leader. In fact he wasn't even close to Brady.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Because his main job is to throw the football yes, but he also has to lead his team. Brady is a great leader and, in turn, is a great winner. I'd rather go into a fourth quarter with Brady at QB than anyone else in football right now. I'd take him over Peyton because I know when the game's on the line, he's gonna produce. He's not gonna let the bright lights of the playoffs stun him and he's gonna lead his team. That's what a quarterback is, a lot more than a passer. To quote Al Pacino, "it's the top spot kid. It's the guy who gets the credit and it's the guy who takes the blame. And the other guys on your team will break their noses and their ribs and their necks for you...once they understand you." That's what Brady is. He has guys who believe and he makes em believe with 4th quarters like yesterday...playing quarterback is about a whole lot more than passing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|