![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Quote:
What gives anyone the reason to believe we are anything more than mediocore? Out of 10 years we have had two winning seasons. other than a year or two of 8-8, we have had losing seasons. I dont care what kind of talent we have on PAPER, until we win games, and the talent lives up to the hype this is who we are. We have done absolutely nothing to discount those opinions. They are actually more fact than opinion. I am sick of hearing how people on here say they are bashing the skins. what makes you think we deserve anything other than bashing or expers questioning our team? We have stunk for all most 10 years. there are only 3 franchises since 2000 that have lost more games than us. Hopefully this year will be different. The only way to stop the negativety towards our skins is to WIN, something we have not done in LONG time. and I mean win year in and year out, not one year out of 5. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Quote:
http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-w...ile-today.html No! <<smootmsmack runs crying to his room>> We have a lot of doubters to prove wrong this season. I think we're up to the task
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Quote:
Same thing happened in '05. I am glad. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Everyone keeps saying lets get this lets get that guy, most are not better than Carter last year. Alex Brown, that everyone keeps asking for, had only 7 sacks. Carter is also not undersized. DE on the weak side are smaller fast rushers. The Redskins only forced 19 sacks, which I am sure made it even harder for Carter to get to the QB. The problem we had was that Holdman sucked. If we had Lavar last year our run defense would have been much better.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Quote:
YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Yeah, lot of good Lavar would have done us while sitting on the bench with a torn achilles.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Quote:
QB-Campbell: no HB-Portis: yes FB-Sellers: yes (name me 16 better fullbacks) WR1-Moss: yes WR2-?: no TE-Cooley: yes LT-Samuels- yes LG-?: no C-Rabach: no RG-Thomas: yes RT-Jansen: not sure...we'll say no CB1-Springs: yes(name me 16 better CBs) CB2-Rogers: no S-Taylor: yes S-Landry: no(???) RE-Carter: no DT-Golston: no DT-Griffin: yes(name me 16 better DTs when healthy) LE-Daniels: no OLB-Washington: yes MLB-Fletcher: yes OLB-McCintosh: no By my count that is 11. Now some of them are obvious and some aren't(Griffin,Spirngs, Sellers) but on talent alone they are certainly better than half of the comparables. The question is health. As to talent anyways...we didn't have much "talent" when our defense was ranked 3rd so maybe "talent" doesn't mean quite as much as he thinks. He has some solid stuff but I think he is a little too negative for my liking. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Quote:
Springs and Griffin are undeniably in the top 32 at their positions. Plus what it comes down to, like Grills showed in 04 and 05 is using the talent you have properly. If you tookmthe best at every position in the league and put them on the field using a bad scheme they'd get beat. Scheme and gameplan is as important as talent in today's NFL. Look at it this way. Talent is the tool and scheme is the handyman. Just because the handyman has the right tool doesn't mean he knows how to use it effectively. What remains to be seen is whether Grills can use the talent we have better than he did last year. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 559
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 60
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
Simple.....NO. We are way above average, just wait and see!
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?
yeah ur right
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|