Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Are the Redskins Below Average?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-18-2007, 03:33 PM   #16
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
I really don't like today's article, in Redskins Insider. Redskins Insider

I think he is way off base. I think that the only place our talent is possibly sub-par is on our Dline. The offensive line is getting old , but they can play. Our skill players, on offense, are well above average. Linebackers are solid, even if McIntosh turns out to be a bust. They will just play Marshall. Campbell is in his third year and from what I hear is the hardest working Quarterback in the NFL. With a near full draft next year, they are well on their way to a championship.

What gives anyone the reason to believe we are anything more than mediocore? Out of 10 years we have had two winning seasons. other than a year or two of 8-8, we have had losing seasons. I dont care what kind of talent we have on PAPER, until we win games, and the talent lives up to the hype this is who we are. We have done absolutely nothing to discount those opinions. They are actually more fact than opinion. I am sick of hearing how people on here say they are bashing the skins. what makes you think we deserve anything other than bashing or expers questioning our team? We have stunk for all most 10 years. there are only 3 franchises since 2000 that have lost more games than us.

Hopefully this year will be different. The only way to stop the negativety towards our skins is to WIN, something we have not done in LONG time. and I mean win year in and year out, not one year out of 5.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-18-2007, 03:39 PM   #17
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
Griffen is the only D-lineman on the Skins who might start for another team in the league. I doubt any of the others on the roster would...
Well, well, well...look who decides to show up after several weeks away. And does he say "thank you" for this?

http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-w...ile-today.html

No! <<smootmsmack runs crying to his room>>

We have a lot of doubters to prove wrong this season. I think we're up to the task
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 03:42 PM   #18
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Well, well, well...look who decides to show up after several weeks away. And does he say "thank you" for this?

http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-w...ile-today.html

No! <<smootmsmack runs crying to his room>>

We have a lot of doubters to prove wrong this season. I think we're up to the task
LOL!!! Welcome back SC. Hope you're smiling and congrats on the blog...
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 03:43 PM   #19
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Well, well, well...look who decides to show up after several weeks away. And does he say "thank you" for this?

http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-w...ile-today.html

No! <<smootmsmack runs crying to his room>>

We have a lot of doubters to prove wrong this season. I think we're up to the task

Same thing happened in '05. I am glad.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 03:44 PM   #20
T.O.Killa
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Everyone keeps saying lets get this lets get that guy, most are not better than Carter last year. Alex Brown, that everyone keeps asking for, had only 7 sacks. Carter is also not undersized. DE on the weak side are smaller fast rushers. The Redskins only forced 19 sacks, which I am sure made it even harder for Carter to get to the QB. The problem we had was that Holdman sucked. If we had Lavar last year our run defense would have been much better.
T.O.Killa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 03:51 PM   #21
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
Everyone keeps saying lets get this lets get that guy, most are not better than carter last year. Alex Brown, that everyone keeps asking for had only 7 sacks. Carter is also not undersized. DE on the weak side are smaller fast rushers. The Redskins only forced 19 sacks, which I am sure made it even harder for Carter to get to the QB. The problem we had was that Holdman sucked. If we had Lavar last year our run defense would have been much better.

YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 03:56 PM   #22
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Yeah, lot of good Lavar would have done us while sitting on the bench with a torn achilles.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 04:15 PM   #23
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
Everyone keeps saying lets get this lets get that guy, most are not better than Carter last year. Alex Brown, that everyone keeps asking for, had only 7 sacks. Carter is also not undersized. DE on the weak side are smaller fast rushers. The Redskins only forced 19 sacks, which I am sure made it even harder for Carter to get to the QB. The problem we had was that Holdman sucked. If we had Lavar last year our run defense would have been much better.
How would have Lavar helped us? He would've been on injured reserve for the whole season.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 04:40 PM   #24
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
Yeah, lot of good Lavar would have done us while sitting on the bench with a torn achilles.

I dont think LaVar would have made a bit of difference on our team last year. One LB spot was a really small portion of our problem.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 04:56 PM   #25
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Other than Clinton Portis, Santana Moss, Chris Samuels, Chris Cooley, Sean Taylor, and maybe Marcus Washington there isn't a single player on the Redskins team that would take over at least 10 players at that position.
This is a dumb assertion because the top 10 is not even half. Try the top 16.:

QB-Campbell: no
HB-Portis: yes
FB-Sellers: yes (name me 16 better fullbacks)
WR1-Moss: yes
WR2-?: no
TE-Cooley: yes
LT-Samuels- yes
LG-?: no
C-Rabach: no
RG-Thomas: yes
RT-Jansen: not sure...we'll say no

CB1-Springs: yes(name me 16 better CBs)
CB2-Rogers: no
S-Taylor: yes
S-Landry: no(???)
RE-Carter: no
DT-Golston: no
DT-Griffin: yes(name me 16 better DTs when healthy)
LE-Daniels: no
OLB-Washington: yes
MLB-Fletcher: yes
OLB-McCintosh: no

By my count that is 11. Now some of them are obvious and some aren't(Griffin,Spirngs, Sellers) but on talent alone they are certainly better than half of the comparables. The question is health.

As to talent anyways...we didn't have much "talent" when our defense was ranked 3rd so maybe "talent" doesn't mean quite as much as he thinks.

He has some solid stuff but I think he is a little too negative for my liking.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 05:01 PM   #26
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
This is a dumb assertion because the top 10 is not even half. Try the top 16.:

QB-Campbell: no
HB-Portis: yes
FB-Sellers: yes (name me 16 better fullbacks)
WR1-Moss: yes
WR2-?: no
TE-Cooley: yes
LT-Samuels- yes
LG-?: no
C-Rabach: no
RG-Thomas: yes
RT-Jansen: not sure...we'll say no

CB1-Springs: yes(name me 16 better CBs)
CB2-Rogers: no
S-Taylor: yes
S-Landry: no(???)
RE-Carter: no
DT-Golston: no
DT-Griffin: yes(name me 16 better DTs when healthy)
LE-Daniels: no
OLB-Washington: yes
MLB-Fletcher: yes
OLB-McCintosh: no

By my count that is 11. Now some of them are obvious and some aren't(Griffin,Spirngs, Sellers) but on talent alone they are certainly better than half of the comparables. The question is health.

As to talent anyways...we didn't have much "talent" when our defense was ranked 3rd so maybe "talent" doesn't mean quite as much as he thinks.

He has some solid stuff but I think he is a little too negative for my liking.
But even top 16 wouldn't be half in many cases. Take CB for example. Each team starts 2, so half would be 32 (not 16)
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 07:07 PM   #27
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
But even top 16 wouldn't be half in many cases. Take CB for example. Each team starts 2, so half would be 32 (not 16)
good point.

Springs and Griffin are undeniably in the top 32 at their positions.

Plus what it comes down to, like Grills showed in 04 and 05 is using the talent you have properly. If you tookmthe best at every position in the league and put them on the field using a bad scheme they'd get beat. Scheme and gameplan is as important as talent in today's NFL.

Look at it this way. Talent is the tool and scheme is the handyman. Just because the handyman has the right tool doesn't mean he knows how to use it effectively. What remains to be seen is whether Grills can use the talent we have better than he did last year.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 08:04 PM   #28
4mrusmc
Impact Rookie
 
4mrusmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 559
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
Until we prove that we can win on a consistent basis, then we'll keep seeing more articles like this.
My point exactly!
4mrusmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 09:05 PM   #29
skinsfan_nn
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 60
Posts: 4,495
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Simple.....NO. We are way above average, just wait and see!
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 09:46 PM   #30
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
Re: Are the Redskins Below Average?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
We'll find out in September. Until then that article is just one person's opinion.
yeah ur right
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.41905 seconds with 10 queries