Carl Peterson resigns in KC

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by redsk1

Peterson, probably not. His resume isn't too bad though. For a 10 year span they were the model franchise. One of the top 5 in the NFL year in and year out.

Probably just misfortune that they never won a SB.

I could live w/ Peterson vs VC.

What 10 years are you talking about?

[Defensewins]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

What 10 years are you talking about?

Not that I want Carl Petersen as our GM, because I do not. I would want someone younger.
But from 1989-1997 KC was consistently a good team. Something Vinny and Snyder have not done in Washington.

KC Season Record

1997 13 3 0 1st
1996 9 7 0 2nd
1995 13 3 0 1st
1994 9 7 0 2nd
1993 11 5 0 1st
1992 10 6 0 2nd
1991 10 6 0 2nd
1990 11 5 0 2nd
1989 8 7 1 2nd

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Defensewins

Not that I want Carl Petersen as our GM, because I do not. I would want someone younger.
But from 1989-1997 KC was consistently a good team. Something Vinny and Snyder have not done in Washington.

KC Season Record

1997 13 3 0 1st
1996 9 7 0 2nd
1995 13 3 0 1st
1994 9 7 0 2nd
1993 11 5 0 1st
1992 10 6 0 2nd
1991 10 6 0 2nd
1990 11 5 0 2nd
1989 8 7 1 2nd

Sure, they had a decent run a decade ago. But I don't know what made them "the model franchise" or one of the top 5 in the NFL

[Defensewins]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Sure, they had a decent run a decade ago. But I don't know what made them "the model franchise" or one of the top 5 in the NFL

During that period of time during Marty's tenure as Head Coach KC went 104-65-1, that is a strong accomplishment for any team.
During that time they were a top 5 team.
Being a winner for many years is a major accomplishment. While it does not come close to winning a super bowl, you have to give Carp Peterson credit for hiring the coaches and drafting the players that made up that team.

[redsk1]

Originally Posted by Defensewins

Not that I want Carl Petersen as our GM, because I do not. I would want someone younger.
But from 1989-1997 KC was consistently a good team. Something Vinny and Snyder have not done in Washington.

KC Season Record

1997 13 3 0 1st
1996 9 7 0 2nd
1995 13 3 0 1st
1994 9 7 0 2nd
1993 11 5 0 1st
1992 10 6 0 2nd
1991 10 6 0 2nd
1990 11 5 0 2nd
1989 8 7 1 2nd

That's a pretty good run. I would venture to say that record is probably top 5 in the nfl during that period. Granted, no SB's but give him some credit.

Not that i would want Peterson, but it amazes me some would be so quick to say no, yet defend VC and his 8 year track record here.

[Defensewins]

Originally Posted by redsk1

That's a pretty good run. I would venture to say that record is probably top 5 in the nfl during that period. Granted, no SB's but give him some credit.

Not that i would want Peterson, but it amazes me some would be so quick to say no, yet defend VC and his 8 year track record here.

Exactly my point.
I like that...VC. Varmint Cong. Licensed to kill gophers.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by redsk1

That's a pretty good run. I would venture to say that record is probably top 5 in the nfl during that period. Granted, no SB's but give him some credit.

Not that i would want Peterson, but it amazes me some would be so quick to say no, yet defend VC and his 8 year track record here.

Regardless of what Vinny has done, I'm just not all that impressed with what Peterson did in his 20 years in KC. One AFC Championship appearance? To me that's pretty easy to say no to.

[Joe Kidd]

He never even made it to a Super Bowl though, and only 1 championship game appearance. That's pretty ho-hum.

[Paintrain]

My bad.. Poor post, I was caught up in post Cincy cynicism and just wanted a change!

[PennSkinsFan]

*** hint *** *** hint **** Vinny *** hint****