Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Quarterback by comittee

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-2005, 01:06 AM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: Quarterback by comittee

I think the Ramsey/Kordell Stewart comparison was a joke.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2005, 10:03 PM   #2
EternalEnigma21
Assistant Regional Mod
 
EternalEnigma21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 45
Posts: 2,958
Re: Quarterback by comittee

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
I think the Ramsey/Kordell Stewart comparison was a joke.
I brought up Stewart but in comparison to Brunell... as a QB that was once good, but not worth starting now, and yeah it was a joke.
EternalEnigma21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2005, 09:36 PM   #3
redskins5044
Playmaker
 
redskins5044's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Schertz, Tx
Age: 46
Posts: 3,224
Re: Quarterback by comittee

I have had a week to calm down about us starting Brunell. I dont think it's the QB position where Gibbs has made an mistake. I think its our WR's we dont have a big possesion WR. We didnt grab Mike Williams in the draft i thought this was a mistake, but Rogers seems to a good CB. So i will not say it was a bad move yet. We traded Gardner a big WR he didnt want to be here to cant argue that move. So going into training camp we had McCants and Dyson as big WR. Released McCants and Dyson. So left with Moss(small) Patten(small) Trash(small) Jacobs(often injured) and brown(small). My point is if we run the ball alot and dont let the QB lose the game we better have a good kicker. ex. on a third and goal from the 5 lets say. we dont have a big WR to go to. Cooley is an option but D's are keying on him this year. So we need to Royal to step in the goaline situations or hope portis can pound it in. The goaline offense i think our big weakness on offense. I want TD's more often than FG's and i am sure most of skins fan do to.
redskins5044 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2005, 09:47 PM   #4
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Quarterback by comittee

We were just spoiled with Art Monk for all those years! The perfect possession receiver!
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2005, 07:38 AM   #5
VTSkins897
Impact Rookie
 
VTSkins897's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 890
Re: Quarterback by comittee

i think he might be on to something. sure the defense would know when we'd be more inclined to pass and stuff; but we cud mix it up. like do a line change and swap the entire D for the entire O (maybe ST cud play QB!!!!!!). this would work in my opinion because then we could say we have a top 5 team on the field. maybe the talent will carry over. then we cud just use the offense team as backups for defense and cheerleaders and waterpeople. (this could maybe help save money on the expenses of the top revenue-producing franchise!) we could maybe win Super Bowl $$$ again!
VTSkins897 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.92044 seconds with 10 queries