Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


O Line

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-21-2005, 07:27 AM   #1
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
Re: O Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan
It's difficult for me to understand how you can max protect, run two man pass routes, and expect to get receivers open. Teams have been giving us trouble just rushing their front four, and at that rate you have seven other players to cover up two receivers, The odds just dosen't seem to be in our favor. That's why our QB has to hold the ball so long because usually there's no one open.
We should at least release Robert Royal and send him out on a pass pattern. Its not like he tries to block anyone anyways.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 07:27 AM   #2
56FAN
Special Teams
 
56FAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MANASSAS VA
Age: 63
Posts: 323
Re: O Line

dockery has got to go. he just doen't seem to br progressing and he's too reactionary and not enough of a dictator.

Last edited by 56FAN; 11-23-2005 at 04:26 PM.
56FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 05:49 PM   #3
joethiesmanfan
The Starter
 
joethiesmanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
Re: O Line

wait a minute the last sack was jansen getting smoked by a linebacker.. number 56..
joethiesmanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 05:55 PM   #4
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
Re: O Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by joethiesmanfan
wait a minute the last sack was jansen getting smoked by a linebacker.. number 56..
jansen has been giving up a couple lately, he will come around or i'll send my boys to break his thumbs
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 06:00 PM   #5
joethiesmanfan
The Starter
 
joethiesmanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
Re: O Line

i am sure he will come around the skins are just inconsistant lately one week the defense dont show up the next week the offense dont show up..
joethiesmanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 06:25 PM   #6
skins009
Impact Rookie
 
skins009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
Re: O Line

One thing is for sure, we need to get rid of Derrick Dockery, he sucks real bad. Our D-line is really missing Griffen right now. I really don't know why we don't rush Lavar more on the outside.
skins009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 04:40 PM   #7
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: O Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by skins009
One thing is for sure, we need to get rid of Derrick Dockery, he sucks real bad. Our D-line is really missing Griffen right now. I really don't know why we don't rush Lavar more on the outside.
I'm not sure I totally agree with you about Dockery. Seems to me he's cut down drastically on holding and false start penalties.

In fact, the costly sacks this year have come on Jansen/Samuels. And against Oakland, one of Burgess' sacks was a missed assignment by, what I could see, Randy Thomas. And he constantly pressured from the outside.

I'm not a big Dockery fan by any stretch of the imagination, but I've made it a point to single him out this year and I think he's been solid at best.

Bottom line, we can nit-pick all day, but the line as a unit isn't playing well this year, especially late in the games.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 05:52 PM   #8
railcon56
Impact Rookie
 
railcon56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
Re: O Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan
I'm not sure I totally agree with you about Dockery. Seems to me he's cut down drastically on holding and false start penalties.

In fact, the costly sacks this year have come on Jansen/Samuels. And against Oakland, one of Burgess' sacks was a missed assignment by, what I could see, Randy Thomas. And he constantly pressured from the outside.

I'm not a big Dockery fan by any stretch of the imagination, but I've made it a point to single him out this year and I think he's been solid at best.

Bottom line, we can nit-pick all day, but the line as a unit isn't playing well this year, especially late in the games.
great name i saw ur flag at the game sunday was awesome
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!!
railcon56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2005, 08:29 AM   #9
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: O Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by railcon56@comcast.net
great name i saw ur flag at the game sunday was awesome
It's all about the 12thMan, baby.....
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 09:41 PM   #10
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Re: The Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso
I've been wanting to say this for a long time. The O-line is not very good. They are average. The D-line is really flawed. Our Defensive Ends are a joke. It's not even something to debate. The lines are the key to this game and we all know it. The problem with this team is the line. O and D. The line on both sides is B-league.

I was taught by many coaches that the game is won at the line of scrimmage. You could not be further from the truth. Our O line has been the reason for every sack that resulted in a fumble. Brunell can't be charged with holding on to the ball too long because he will throw it away. But when defenders are hitting him from his blind-side while Samuels is watching helplessly, its a shame. Chris Cooley has been horrible at blocking and yesterday was no difference. Cooley missed the block on Simeon Rice last week and threw his Gatorade cup in disguss because of his failure to protect. He has to play blocker as well as he catches the ball.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 09:49 PM   #11
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: The Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNRA
I was taught by many coaches that the game is won at the line of scrimmage. You could not be further from the truth. Our O line has been the reason for every sack that resulted in a fumble. Brunell can't be charged with holding on to the ball too long because he will throw it away. But when defenders are hitting him from his blind-side while Samuels is watching helplessly, its a shame. Chris Cooley has been horrible at blocking and yesterday was no difference. Cooley missed the block on Simeon Rice last week and threw his Gatorade cup in disguss because of his failure to protect. He has to play blocker as well as he catches the ball.
Aren't you agreeing with wilsowilso that the O-line is a problem? And doesn't Jansen cover the blindside, not Samuels?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 08:50 PM   #12
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Re: O Line

Our O-line was a trainwreck on Sunday.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 10:00 PM   #13
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Re: O Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32
Our O-line was a trainwreck on Sunday.
How? The running game looked good. The passing game looked bad, but I think that was more of a reflection of no one getting open.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 10:05 PM   #14
railcon56
Impact Rookie
 
railcon56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
Re: O Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramseyfan
How? The running game looked good. The passing game looked bad, but I think that was more of a reflection of no one getting open.
I'm with you on this one in fact portis is getting more yards every week... i really didnt see pressure well ok the last play but i didnt see the poor line play....
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!!
railcon56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2005, 09:14 PM   #15
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Re: O Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramseyfan
How? The running game looked good. The passing game looked bad, but I think that was more of a reflection of no one getting open.
It was the worst game I have ever seen Jansen play for one. He got beat around the end several times. They made Burgess look like Reggie White. I know you watch the games closely Ramsey so i am not going to say otherwise, but I really thought the pass protection was terrible.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.70961 seconds with 10 queries