Does Lloyd's "attitude" bother anyone?

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

What's up with the Parrot avatar there, JoeRedskin?

Strange isn't it

[jdlea]

I actually like that avatar...

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

What's up with the Parrot avatar there, JoeRedskin?

Ask your buddy TAFKAS, you egomaniacal mod. Both of you need to curb your powers and use them for good rather than the self-centered incompetent evil you now claim as your own.

[Bozzy]

Originally Posted by BrudLee

Yeah, but I'm bored with merging threads. Instead, I'm going to merge posters.

I hope you like offiss, because you're with him now.

dude that's hilarious!

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Ask your buddy TAFKAS, you egomaniacal mod. Both of you need to curb your powers and use them for good rather than the self-centered incompetent evil you now claim as your own.

You know what, you're not good enough for the Parrot avatar. Let's find you a more fitting one

[Dirtbag59]

GOOSEFRABA GOOSEFRABA GOOSEFRABA.

Oh yeah, Lloyds attitude doesn't bother me.

[jermus22]

Even when we had that awesome Gibbs team from 1991-92, two stars (Gary Clark and Wilber Marshall) were occasionally known for opening their mouths too much. If Lloyd's biggest problem is that he said T.O. was bad for S.F., I don't think he'll be a huge problem for the team. Glad we added some young talent to the team (also glad we re-signed Rock and released Raymer, Bowen, and Tupa). Sad to see Harris go since he was a good nickelback, but his contract would've been too much.

[jamf]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I like you though. You're not my arch nemesis. You're not Newman to my Seinfeld.

The Artist Formerly Known as SoupNazi?

[That Guy]

grr, that was a secret. NO SOUP FOR YOU!

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by jamf

The Artist Formerly Known as SoupNazi?

That's pretty funny. I can laugh at that because I know a fellow Latino wouldn't take the side of my arch-nemesis. Right jamf?

[SanFranSkinsFan]

Originally Posted by jermus22

Even when we had that awesome Gibbs team from 1991-92, two stars (Gary Clark and Wilber Marshall) were occasionally known for opening their mouths too much. If Lloyd's biggest problem is that he said T.O. was bad for S.F., I don't think he'll be a huge problem for the team. Glad we added some young talent to the team (also glad we re-signed Rock and released Raymer, Bowen, and Tupa). Sad to see Harris go since he was a good nickelback, but his contract would've been too much.

Lloyd is a bit of a hothead but so is Mike Nolan. Remember how he treated Jamie Winborn, trading him to Jacksonville. I watched Lloyd a lot this year and he's pretty good, certainly worth the draft picks we gave up if he can buy into the team first concept. He's no smurf and will make CBs respect his abilities. He caught 4 TDs from Rattay and Alex Smith was horrible last year, so his numbers should top 1000 yards if he starts, or at least 800 as a 3rd wideout. A good addition and Randel El would be another fine piece to add to the puzzle, but Lloyd makes us better....

[hooskins]

I say we start him, he has so much potential and making him number 3 would only hold that back. And like alot of other people have said, I have faith in Gibbs dealing with this "attitude" or whatever.

[That Guy]

basically right now we have a #1, #1.5, #2.5, #4 (thrash), #6 (brown), and #2000 (take wild guess here) WR on the roster. randle would be a #2.5, but he's really better as a #3.

if we get randle i don't know how you'd keep them all happy though. moss wouldn't care and talent wise, you have a clear #2... patten and randle are both very good #3s though and we simply have not run 4 WR sets here, and we don't use many 3 WR sets either.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by That Guy

basically right now we have a #1, #1.5, #2.5, #4 (thrash), #6 (brown), and #2000 (take wild guess here) WR on the roster. randle would be a #2.5, but he's really better as a #3.

if we get randle i don't know how you'd keep them all happy though. moss wouldn't care and talent wise, you have a clear #2... patten and randle are both very good #3s though and we simply have not run 4 WR sets here, and we don't use many 3 WR sets either.

Exactly. We'd be better off with Cooley, Moss, Lloyd, and Randle El on the Field than Patten instead of Cooley. BTW I like the numbering system. Puts things in perspective for morons like me.