Is Leonard Davis going to be a Redskin?

[CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR]

Of course we will pay davis he wasnt drafted by the skins. Thats why dock going to leave. Danny cant sell dock jershey but davis is a new guy, so you can sell new jersheys.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR

Of course we will pay davis he wasnt drafted by the skins. Thats why dock going to leave. Danny cant sell dock jershey but davis is a new guy, so you can sell new jersheys.

That's a great point. Danny's definitely all about signing new players, not keeping current ones. That's why we didn't re-sign Jansen, Betts, Sellers, Thomas, and Fox....oh wait

[RedskinPete]

It's funny what a year dose to many of your views towards Dockery. Many here wanted him out...he wasn't getting it done. Then part of 05 and and 06 season he comes around. Even back then I had Dock's back. But even as the Redskins stayed with him during the rough days it dosen't mean a thing now. It is all about money and caps. So that said is he worth paying the cash vs someone else? That is what matters to us as Redskin fans. Because lets face it he is not thinking about us he is thinking about himself and his family! So if he gose and we up grade that is fine with me!!!

[VTSkins]

could be a good pickup if we don't overpay for him. Bugel can work his magic on him too. I beleive he played his first 3 years as a guard. Maybe shift him over to replace Jansen when he gets old.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR

Of course we will pay davis he wasnt drafted by the skins. Thats why dock going to leave. Danny cant sell dock jershey but davis is a new guy, so you can sell new jersheys.

Davis won't make Dock money unless the Cowgirls panic because they heard a rumor that Washington wanted him.

Funny how anyone who was perceived to be on our radar has secured their family's financial security for generations.

[CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR]

well lets see him keep dock. Sorry because he signs a few players this year, doesnt change the fact since 2000 we let our so call core players leave that a fact. keep pierce we wouldnt need London who older n slower than pierce,kept smoot we would have wasted a pick on rogers we would have merrieman or ware that would fill our void for a pass rusher. Paid Bailey what he wanted we wouldnt had to pay springs who cant get on the field because he hurt all the time. Listen Jansen on the downside, fox is just a backup, betts can start on other teams. Thomas is starting getting older and seller is a beast. Dock will leave then we will have to pay out of the butt for someother FA to learn the system and hope to protect Campbell. Also thank god we keep Brunell i can sleep better. So if i upset you but calling out your dad Danny,

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR

well lets see him keep dock. Sorry because he signs a few players this year, doesnt change the fact since 2000 we let our so call core players leave that a fact. keep pierce we wouldnt need London who older n slower than pierce,kept smoot we would have wasted a pick on rogers we would have merrieman or ware that would fill our void for a pass rusher. Paid Bailey what he wanted we wouldnt had to pay springs who cant get on the field because he hurt all the time. Listen Jansen on the downside, fox is just a backup, betts can start on other teams. Thomas is starting getting older and seller is a beast. Dock will leave then we will have to pay out of the butt for someother FA to learn the system and hope to protect Campbell. Also thank god we keep Brunell i can sleep better. So if i upset you but calling out your dad Danny,

Don't take this wrong way but you didn't upset me. You couldn't because I couldn't care less about you. So no worries there.

Pierce, I agree it would have been nice to keep him

Smoot, we're probably going to get a pretty decent deal for him I imagine. Had we paid him what he was looking for a couple of years ago we might not be in a position to make some of the other moves we've subsequently made

Bailey, sometimes it's about more than the money

Springs, enough people here have explained that this whole injury bug thing is greatly exaggerated

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR

well lets see him keep dock. Sorry because he signs a few players this year, doesnt change the fact since 2000 we let our so call core players leave that a fact. keep pierce we wouldnt need London who older n slower than pierce,kept smoot we would have wasted a pick on rogers we would have merrieman or ware that would fill our void for a pass rusher. Paid Bailey what he wanted we wouldnt had to pay springs who cant get on the field because he hurt all the time. Listen Jansen on the downside, fox is just a backup, betts can start on other teams. Thomas is starting getting older and seller is a beast. Dock will leave then we will have to pay out of the butt for someother FA to learn the system and hope to protect Campbell. Also thank god we keep Brunell i can sleep better. So if i upset you but calling out your dad Danny,

All of your points are valid (except the one on Dock) but you are living in the past. 2007 is the new Redskin order where all signings are reasonable and they make sense.

You may be upset that they didn't sign Clements for 81 million but not this year.

I like that they held onto Arch and Lloyd. They have decided that the coaches are going to make these guys earn their checks.

Hail to the Redskins!

[CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR]

You and matty seem to care for me deeply. Everytime i say something you guy jump in real quick. So thanks. Sorry i dont follow the company line.

[ArtMonkDrillz]

I think a lot of people around here are a little too testy today. And Taf, I'm glad to see someone else write "I couldn't care less..." as opposed to "I could care less..."

Once again, I would take just about any decent guard over Dockery if it means that we don't have to pay Dock the kind of money that the Bills did.

[RedskinPete]

Originally Posted by ArtMonkDrillz

I think a lot of people around here are a little too testy today. And Taf, I'm glad to see someone else write "I couldn't care less..." as opposed to "I could care less..."

Once again, I would take just about any decent guard over Dockery if it means that he don't have to pay Dock the kind of money that the Bills did.

I am with you! I think the Redskins saw that that was the best Dockery was going to be. Face it there is no more up side. So now we need to fill the spot. Better a guard then a tackle!!!

[diehardskin2982]

I think honestly we could not afford Dock. If we get Davis Here he will sign with us. That would be an upgrade at gaurd if he is brought here

[5RINGS]

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

I think honestly we could not afford Dock. If we get Davis Here he will sign with us. That would be an upgrade at gaurd if he is brought here

You're gonna get your chance.
Leonard Davis has left Dallas.
I doubt he leaves Washington without signing.

[FRPLG]

Originally Posted by 5RINGS

You're gonna get your chance.
Leonard Davis has left Dallas.
I doubt he leaves Washington without signing.

Danny boy doesn't usually let guys leave without giving them some of his money.

[Dirtbag59]

I wonder if the Redskins are meeting with Davis so they can jack up the price for the Giants and Cowboys.