The I hate the Patriots thread!

[TheMalcolmConnection]

What worries me most about this picture is how the poop got there.

Unless your dogs have great aim, did you have to pick that up and move the poo?

[jamf]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

What worries me most about this picture is how the poop got there.

Unless your dogs have great aim, did you have to pick that up and move the poo?

Thank god he doesn't have a great dane.

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

What worries me most about this picture is how the poop got there.

Unless your dogs have great aim, did you have to pick that up and move the poo?

LOL...I stepped up to the plate for the sake of a great picture!

Not to get too technical, but out here the sun bakes everything extremely quickly. The poo gets very dry in a matter of hours after it is pooed. It was easy to pick it up with the patriot shirt and pose it for the picture.

[mheisig]

Originally Posted by jsarno

LOL...I stepped up to the plate for the sake of a great picture!

Not to get too technical, but out here the sun bakes everything extremely quickly. The poo gets very dry in a matter of hours after it is pooed. It was easy to pick it up with the patriot shirt and pose it for the picture.

Did you use gloves, a bag or some sort of barrier?

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by mheisig

Did you use gloves, a bag or some sort of barrier?

Yes:
It was easy to pick it up with the patriot shirt and pose it for the picture.

I used the shirt.

[mheisig]

Originally Posted by jsarno

Yes:
It was easy to pick it up with the patriot shirt and pose it for the picture.

I used the shirt.

Ah, my mistake. I got distracted amidst all the poo talk.

[sandtrapjack]

Originally Posted by jsarno

LOL...I stepped up to the plate for the sake of a great picture!

Not to get too technical, but out here the sun bakes everything extremely quickly. The poo gets very dry in a matter of hours after it is pooed. It was easy to pick it up with the patriot shirt and pose it for the picture.

Ok guys really....how much LOWER can this conversation go?

[saden1]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

Ok guys really....how much LOWER can this conversation go?

After we beat the Cowboys?

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

Ok guys really....how much LOWER can this conversation go?

Believe me when I tell you, I've seen conversation sink much lower than this one...and on a similiar topic.

[XtremeSkin1]

[QUOTE=jsarno;354993]Is anyone else sick of their dilusions about "it's the world against me" crap? First is was the disrespect thing, now the belicheat thing.

My basset hounds decided to make a statement! LOL.



LOLOLOLOL

YOU GOT THE VIDEO CLIP?

[SmootSmack]

I'm with Skinsfan69 on this...sort of. Knowing the defensive signals certainly helped but you still have to be able to execute against it. And I don't think they knew any signals when Ellis Hobbs returned the kickoff 108 yards for a touchdown in week one, or when Ty Law had the INT for a TD in the Super Bowl against the Rams, or when Vinatieri kicked two game-winning Super Bowl field goals. True, you can maybe argue that because they knew the signals the offense was able to march downfield to get in field goal position, (if they were indeed videotaping back then) but AV still has to hit those field goals and they weren't gimmes.

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I'm with Skinsfan69 on this...sort of. Knowing the defensive signals certainly helped but you still have to be able to execute against it. And I don't think they knew any signals when Ellis Hobbs returned the kickoff 108 yards for a touchdown in week one, or when Ty Law had the INT for a TD in the Super Bowl against the Rams, or when Vinatieri kicked two game-winning Super Bowl field goals. True, you can maybe argue that because they knew the signals the offense was able to march downfield to get in field goal position, (if they were indeed videotaping back then) but AV still has to hit those field goals and they weren't gimmes.

No one is arguing what they did hit...they are arguing how they got there. Even just 2 or 3 pivotal plays means a lot in football, and I'm sure they used their info a lot more than just 2 or 3 plays. How many times did the Pats "mysteriously" stop the best offense in the league in that Rams super bowl? Again, we'll never know, but it answers a lot of questions if you ask me.

This conversation boils down to one question:
If it didn't help them, if they didn't use it to cheat, then why do it all?
(nuff said)

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by jsarno

No one is arguing what they did hit...they are arguing how they got there. Even just 2 or 3 pivotal plays means a lot in football, and I'm sure they used their info a lot more than just 2 or 3 plays. How many times did the Pats "mysteriously" stop the best offense in the league in that Rams super bowl? Again, we'll never know, but it answers a lot of questions if you ask me.

This conversation boils down to one question:
If it didn't help them, if they didn't use it to cheat, then why do it all?
(nuff said)

See this is what pisses me off. The reason they stoped the Rams is becacuse Mike Martz is a dumbass playcaller. He thinks his pass game is the best thing since sliced bread. The whole game NE played a soft zone with extra DB's. All he had to do was give to Faulk 35 times and run play action off of it and they would have won the game. But he kept calling pass plays, and the Rams WR's kept getting killed. Dumbest game plan I have ever seen.

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

See this is what pisses me off. The reason they stoped the Rams is becacuse Mike Martz is a dumbass playcaller. He thinks his pass game is the best thing since sliced bread. The whole game NE played a soft zone with extra DB's. All he had to do was give to Faulk 35 times and run play action off of it and they would have won the game. But he kept calling pass plays, and the Rams WR's kept getting killed. Dumbest game plan I have ever seen.

You can't tell me it's not [i]possible[/b] that they cheated to beat the rams. I'm not saying they did...I'm just not dismissing the possibility they did.

When you get caught doing something as bad as they did, you're entire history and integrity and class comes in to question.
You don't have to like it, but it doesn't make it any more true.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by jsarno

You can't tell me it's not [i]possible[/b] that they cheated to beat the rams. I'm not saying they did...I'm just not dismissing the possibility they did.

When you get caught doing something as bad as they did, you're entire history and integrity and class comes in to question.
You don't have to like it, but it doesn't make it any more true.

If you are a football knowledgeable person, and I assume that you are, you know this cannot affect the outcome of a game. Too much has to happen in a short period of time. Plus if you do your film work, and these guys do their film work, you already know what the other team is running on defense anyway. You see their tendencies and you know what type of blitzes they run. Plus defenses in the NFL move around so much before the snap anyway. So what you get when you lineup is not what you get when the ball is snapped in some cases.

If you play a team that runs the Tampa 2 like TB, Chi. Det or Indy they basically never change what they do. They say "this is what we do beat us." Like I said it's just the media putting all the hype behind it. But I laugh at it cause I know it doesn't really help.

I use to play football many many years ago. Some of our crosstown rivals knew our audibles. They knew "3" was the hot number most of the time. That was the number we used to change a play. So we changed it to 7 or 8 whenver we played them. Instead of saying "3" we say "7, 60, 787, B choice," which is a pass play with play action w/ the rb having an option. It's that simple.