Which QB Fits Best?

[mlmpetert]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Bradford then Cutler... Sanchez? Thank god we didn't get him

Sanchez is the Devin Thomas of quarterbacks. Imagine if we had him.... if you thnk fan morale is bad now!

[SFREDSKIN]

I disagree on the dirty Sanchez comments. I think if had a decent OC instead of BS that he would do better just like Alex Smith.

[mlmpetert]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I disagree on the dirty Sanchez comments. I think if had a decent OC instead of BS that he would do better just like Alex Smith.

I agree, but its hard to make any excuses when hes srounded by so much talent. Maybe the kids of legardary offensive cordinators just dont make for good offensive cordinators themselves? Like it skips a generation or something....

[SBXVII]

However looking at NFL.com:

#16 Mark Sanchez
#18 Jay Cutler
#25 Sam Bradford
#26 Rex Grossman

This is how their being rated so far by STATS. for you stat minded fans.

NFL Stats: by Player Category

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

However looking at NFL.com:

#16 Mark Sanchez
#18 Jay Cutler
#25 Sam Bradford
#26 Rex Grossman

This is how their being rated so far by STATS. for you stat minded fans.

NFL Stats: by Player Category

I was talking career wise, sorry.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I was talking career wise.

Ok. I'm wrong about Cutler. Sorry folks.

But personally seeing what Sanchez can do and looking at his bad year this year I'd take Sanchez. Funny though even with his bad year this year his record is better then the rest.

[mlmpetert]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

However looking at NFL.com:

#16 Mark Sanchez
#18 Jay Cutler
#25 Sam Bradford
#26 Rex Grossman

This is how their being rated so far by STATS. for you stat minded fans.

NFL Stats: by Player Category

This is a worthless list, so much so that its not even worthy of Tebow and his less then 14 passes per game.....

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by mlmpetert

This is a worthless list, so much so that its not even worthy of Tebow and his less then 14 passes per game.....

Wait a min. I'm only throwing out the site because some one mentioned that Cutler has better stats then Grossman. I've been proven wrong. I'll happily take my lump, but don't decide because the stats don't make you happy or prove your point then they list should be thrown out.

I don't like the list either, but those are this years stats. I'll presume your not a stat driven person like me. I like to think there is a lot more to look at in a QB then stats and I can understand if thats the case why you'd think the list is junk but it is what it is.

[mlmpetert]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

Wait a min. I'm only throwing out the site because some one mentioned that Cutler has better stats then Grossman. I've been proven wrong. I'll happily take my lump, but don't decide because the stats don't make you happy or prove your point then they list should be thrown out.

I don't like the list either, but those are this years stats. I'll presume your not a stat driven person like me. I like to think there is a lot more to look at in a QB then stats and I can understand if thats the case why you'd think the list is junk but it is what it is.

My bad man, i was just kidding. I thought it was hilarious Tebow wasnt on the list because his passes dont average out to 14 per game or more.... I mean even Beck is included. I guess all the more credit to both John Fox and the Shanahans.

Im not a big stat guy either. The only things that matters to me are winning and how a QB performs in the clutch. I was originally thinking Bradford would be the best for our team, but after reading everyones post ill concede to the fact that Cutler may be better suited. Either way i dont think we could have gone with either. And i think for Locker i think its just WAYYY too early to tell what tell become.

[CultBrennan59]

Cutler. When he's had good receivers, and an oline, he's been great (Denver).

When he's had no oline and barely any good receivers, he's been good enough to keep his team in the game (Chicago). Imagine him in Chicago with a good OLine and atleast one above-good receiver.

Now Bradford, imagine him with a Solid receiver he'd be good as well, but he doesn't have the arm or experience of Cutler, however he does have better accuracy.

[Dirtbag59]

Cutler and it's not even close. 3 years in the system and proven production. Keep in mind his best statistical year under Shanny came when he played with undiagnosed type 1 diabets. He also led the Bears to the NFC championship and an NFC North title in spite of having a porous offensive line. And now in a year where the NFC North is absolutely stacked he has them in position to return to the playoffs. For God's sake he's succeeding at QB in a city that has had worse luck at the position then us.

[DCtoAZ]

are you kidding me with this question ? CUTLER .. looking back it's a damn shame we weren't able to land that SOB .. he was a freaking beast with Shanny .. damn that would have lined up nice .. oh well ... Barkley to the Skins' in 2012

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by DCtoAZ

are you kidding me with this question ? CUTLER .. looking back it's a damn shame we weren't able to land that SOB .. he was a freaking beast with Shanny .. damn that would have lined up nice .. oh well ... Barkley to the Skins' in 2012

I hate to say it and I know you have to build a team but right now Cutler would have a bigger impact here then Williams and Orakpo combined.

[SmootSmack]

I don't quite know who I would choose.

But I do find it kind of interesting we've had weeks of "Mike needs to take the offense back from Kyle." "Mike's offense runs the ball, Kyle's doesn't." Etc

And yet the rationale a lot of people have here for Cutler is his experience in Mike's offense. Do you assume then that if Cutler were here Kyle wouldn't be the OC?

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I don't quite know who I would choose.

But I do find it kind of interesting we've had weeks of "Mike needs to take the offense back from Kyle." "Mike's offense runs the ball, Kyle's doesn't." Etc

And yet the rationale a lot of people have here for Cutler is his experience in Mike's offense. Do you assume then that if Cutler were here Kyle wouldn't be the OC?

Well, MS just came out with the perverbial.... we are going to get the running game back again. So "if" MS was going to take OC over then I'd imagine we fans would only know by how the offense is either running more or running his style of plays. I doubt we would see any changes in titles and it probably would be for giving KS more experience.

In other words nothing would change just MS would be calling the plays from his mike on the sideline vs. KS calling the plays. None of us would know and most likely only the players would know.