London Fletcher re-signs with Redskins

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

I think people completely missed the point on that Fletcher post, but whatever.

Most of your posts are negative. I think most people here just don't care to examining them that closely, especially when you describe him as "hobbled". We're all happy London has re-signed here. 'Nuff said.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

Most of your posts are negative. I think most people here just don't care to examining them that closely, especially when you describe him as "hobbled". We're all happy London has re-signed here. 'Nuff said.

I don't think a majority of my posts are negative at all.

If you're tired of reading my posts, don't comment on them. Look, there's a number of posters on here I don't bother to respond to. There's only so many ways you can put "I disagree" in a post. If I'm not interested, I just skip over when I see the username.

If calling something a "critical signing" comes off as overly negative to someone, then I don't have the time for them.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

I don't think a majority of my posts are negative at all.

If you're tired of reading my posts, don't comment on them. Look, there's a number of posters on here I don't bother to respond to. There's only so many ways you can put "I disagree" in a post. If I'm not interested, I just skip over when I see the username.

If calling something a "critical signing" comes off as overly negative to someone, then I don't have the time for them.

It wasnt that part of the post that I was saying was negative. I agree 100%. It was the latter, which I rather have plan A than plan B. Id like to think Riley can improve in coverage and I like to think Fletcher is not hobbled and still can produce. U just stated the worse case possible of Riley play and Fletch not being able to produce, which again are possible. I dont know so much if they are probable. Lets hope not, right?

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

I don't think a majority of my posts are negative at all.

If you're tired of reading my posts, don't comment on them. Look, there's a number of posters on here I don't bother to respond to. There's only so many ways you can put "I disagree" in a post. If I'm not interested, I just skip over when I see the username.

If calling something a "critical signing" comes off as overly negative to someone, then I don't have the time for them.

Nearly every one of your posts are not only negative, but apparently cased on some alternate reality.

Fletcher hobbled? That is completely ridiculous.

You're the ultimate pessimist and it's beyond the point of just getting old. Your posts are beginning to hold the same value as those of Giantone and Sandtrapjack.

You claim to be a Redskins fan, but have you ever actually cheered for the team?


Anyway, you probably love the attention your out-of-touch posts receive so I'll finish up stroking your ego and just say...


Finally! Resigning London is one of the most important moves we've made this offeseason!

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

Nearly every one of your posts are not only negative, but apparently cased on some alternate reality.

Fletcher hobbled? That is completely ridiculous.

You're the ultimate pessimist and it's beyond the point of just getting old. Your posts are beginning to hold the same value as those of Giantone and Sandtrapjack.

You claim to be a Redskins fan, but have you ever actually cheered for the team?


Anyway, you probably love the attention your out-of-touch posts receive so I'll finish up stroking your ego and just say...


Finally! Resigning London is one of the most important moves we've made this offeseason!

Just skip over his post. You will see a large portion of text with a bunch of useless words and numbers this is when your brain says move to the next post just crap here.

There was a time when I actually enjoyed his post or got some information from them. If you read his post thinking everything he says is fact you are sadly misinformed. He just throws so much crap against the wall in hopes it will stick no one with any sort of life would have the time to research everything he says.

GT is someone who needs to step back and determine the quality of his life. If all he does (it seems that way at least) at the young age of 23 is research and write as many negative things as possible about the Redskins then he should recheck his priorities.

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Being honest, I have noticed many of your post seem jaded and disillusioned with a lot of what the skins have done this offseason. I never noticed this in the past and, I've actually wondered what's prompted it. I'm generally lean towards the negative with the skins, but this season after the trade for the second overall pick, I've turned more optimistic. So have the majority of fans. So Tripp, what's up? Do you think we're all being foolish to get so excited about the franchises direction?

[Dirtbag59]

3 Years $26 Million $14 million Guranteed.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

3 Years $26 Million $14 million Guranteed.

Really? I heard it was 2 years 20 mil 15 mil guaranteed. Where'd you get those numbers from?

[whistler]

Originally Posted by mooby

Really? I heard it was 2 years 20 mil 15 mil guaranteed. Where'd you get those numbers from?

Way too much! If those numbers are correct the skins have hog tied themselves, and will have to cut Cooley and others to make cap room. They don't even have the rookie pool available if that's the case.

[REDSKINS4ever]

It looks like London Fletcher got the sort of deal he was looking for. If the Redskins and Fletcher were unable to come to an agreement, then sending a a draft pick to the Jets for Bart Scott would not have been a bad move to make. But fortunately it didn't come down to that. Fletcher has signed and the Redskins and Mike Shanahan accomplished one of the many things that was a goal in the offseason.

[That Guy]

i hope $12mill is in the 3rd year that we never have to pay. that seems like a lot for a 37 year old.

[REDSKINS4ever]

Originally Posted by That Guy

i hope $12mill is in the 3rd year that we never have to pay. that seems like a lot for a 37 year old.

Forget Fletcher's age. I'm glad he got the kind of deal that he was hoping for. The fact of the matter is I would rather have Fletcher than any of the rookie linebackers entering the draft in 12 days. Fletcher, despite being 36 years old, has not slowed down at all. No one who has watched every game for the past five seasons can say Fletcher is any different than he was when he was a rookie linebacker for the Rams. The guy is pure gold to the Redskin defense.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever

Forget Fletcher's age. I'm glad he got the kind of deal that he was hoping for.

1. No thanks. he's 36/37, that's old and makes big money a much bigger risk.

2. I'm not. If those numbers are right that's too much. I'm a fan of the team first.

[Counter-Tre]

[Dirtbag59]