Brunell sucks

FirstandTen · 11-20-2005, 07:50 PM

Brunell does not suck.. Did u think he sucked last week? Did he suck when he went head first to get the 1st down? This thread sucks!! I could make a million more points but its not worth it. If you think he sucks after one bad game that wasn't entirely his fault then you have no idea what your talking about anyway.

Misterbillysells · 11-20-2005, 07:55 PM

dont you think some of those overthrows had to do with taylor lacking the speed that patten has...how many times did he over throw jacobs...brunnel doesnt suck he just has to adjust to the new personnel

htownskinfan · 11-20-2005, 07:56 PM

off and def line sucked,bottom line,anything else is mute,if we had M Vick it might have made a difference being able to scramble away from the pressure

TheMalcolmConnection · 11-20-2005, 07:59 PM

But if we had Mike Vick we also might not make anywhere NEAR the amount of completions that we do right now.

hurrykaine · 11-20-2005, 08:29 PM

This thread should have read: "Robert Royal Sucks". All the blind side sacks come because Robert Royal sucks as a blocker. Jansens play has dropped off a bit too, but attribute that to injury.

Sure targets like Cooley have become fumble prone now. Cooley has to be playing hurt. Portis' fumbles were inexcusable today. I realized the offense came out flat today right in the first quarter when our drives stalled at midfield. We weren't able to pick up third and shorts against the Raiders D? How does this team not come out ready to play in a home game after a loss?! Coaching staff equally to blame for this dismal outing.

irish · 11-21-2005, 08:48 AM

MB is the least of the O's problems. The line line could not protect him yesterday and when he did have time to throw he only has 1 receiver thats a threat. When that receiver is shut down their is no passing game.

#56fanatic · 11-21-2005, 08:57 AM

What is wrong with you people. Look I was on the wagon last year calling for Brunells head. But no way are we 5-5 without him. To say Brunell suck is rediculous. The last two games we lost fall on the coaches, both offensive and defensive. Brunell has made a tremendous amount of plays this year for this team. Portis fumbles twice yesterday, but the fact is we are winning late in the game and should have been running the ball, not throwing deep ball after deep ball down the sideline to our #4 receiver. Brunell does not make the calls, and be glad the throws were a little off, because if not the would have been picked. Brunell is putting ball where only the receiver can make plays. If the receiver cant, then the ball is thrown out of bounds. Brunell has by far, been the MVP of this team so far this season, as well as moss.

Its the coaches job to find or figure out a way to get somebody else open if Moss is getting doubled all day. This crap of not having any receiver is just that, crap. They play in the NFL, they cant be that bad to where they cant catch a damn ball. Portis should have had the ball late in the game and he didn't. thats what it comes down to. Bad play calling. on both sides of the ball.

Twilbert07 · 11-21-2005, 08:59 AM

The bottom line is that Brunell has played some good games and some bad games this season. Either way, though, Gibbs' decision to make him the starter means we start all over at the QB season next season or in 2007. Therefore, we're in for a couple more .500 seasons.

Skinnydo · 11-21-2005, 09:27 AM

I predict the Skins will win-out and Brunell will be the MAN! At 11-5 the Skins will not only be in the playoff, but will win the Super Bowl!!! Brunell will be the most valuable player and will, of course, be in the Pro-Bowl and on his way to the Hall of Fame. Whatever you do, do NOT sell Brunell and the Skins short!

Southpaw · 11-21-2005, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinnydo

I predict the Skins will win-out and Brunell will be the MAN! At 11-5 the Skins will not only be in the playoff, but will win the Super Bowl!!! Brunell will be the most valuable player and will, of course, be in the Pro-Bowl and on his way to the Hall of Fame. Whatever you do, do NOT sell Brunell and the Skins short!

Wow... this has to be a joke.

skinsguy · 11-21-2005, 01:34 PM

I would like to see Campbell play ONLY if there was no way for us to make the playoffs. Otherwise, it's foolish to demand Brunell's head on a platter. The guy is a great team leader.

11-20-2005, 07:50 PM	#1
FirstandTen Special Teams Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bristow VA Age: 49 Posts: 254	Re: Brunell sucks Brunell does not suck.. Did u think he sucked last week? Did he suck when he went head first to get the 1st down? This thread sucks!! I could make a million more points but its not worth it. If you think he sucks after one bad game that wasn't entirely his fault then you have no idea what your talking about anyway.

11-20-2005, 07:55 PM	#2
Misterbillysells Camp Scrub Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 80	Re: Brunell sucks dont you think some of those overthrows had to do with taylor lacking the speed that patten has...how many times did he over throw jacobs...brunnel doesnt suck he just has to adjust to the new personnel

11-20-2005, 07:56 PM	#3
htownskinfan JUST LIVIN Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: houston,tx Age: 63 Posts: 4,929	Re: Brunell sucks off and def line sucked,bottom line,anything else is mute,if we had M Vick it might have made a difference being able to scramble away from the pressure

11-21-2005, 08:48 AM	#6
irish Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 4,575	Re: Brunell sucks MB is the least of the O's problems. The line line could not protect him yesterday and when he did have time to throw he only has 1 receiver thats a threat. When that receiver is shut down their is no passing game.

11-21-2005, 08:57 AM	#7
#56fanatic The Starter Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Charlotte NC Age: 51 Posts: 1,801	Re: Brunell sucks What is wrong with you people. Look I was on the wagon last year calling for Brunells head. But no way are we 5-5 without him. To say Brunell suck is rediculous. The last two games we lost fall on the coaches, both offensive and defensive. Brunell has made a tremendous amount of plays this year for this team. Portis fumbles twice yesterday, but the fact is we are winning late in the game and should have been running the ball, not throwing deep ball after deep ball down the sideline to our #4 receiver. Brunell does not make the calls, and be glad the throws were a little off, because if not the would have been picked. Brunell is putting ball where only the receiver can make plays. If the receiver cant, then the ball is thrown out of bounds. Brunell has by far, been the MVP of this team so far this season, as well as moss. Its the coaches job to find or figure out a way to get somebody else open if Moss is getting doubled all day. This crap of not having any receiver is just that, crap. They play in the NFL, they cant be that bad to where they cant catch a damn ball. Portis should have had the ball late in the game and he didn't. thats what it comes down to. Bad play calling. on both sides of the ball.

11-20-2005, 07:59 PM	#4
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,264	Re: Brunell sucks But if we had Mike Vick we also might not make anywhere NEAR the amount of completions that we do right now. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

11-20-2005, 08:29 PM	#5
hurrykaine Impact Rookie Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Washington, D.C. Age: 52 Posts: 762	Re: Brunell sucks This thread should have read: "Robert Royal Sucks". All the blind side sacks come because Robert Royal sucks as a blocker. Jansens play has dropped off a bit too, but attribute that to injury. Sure targets like Cooley have become fumble prone now. Cooley has to be playing hurt. Portis' fumbles were inexcusable today. I realized the offense came out flat today right in the first quarter when our drives stalled at midfield. We weren't able to pick up third and shorts against the Raiders D? How does this team not come out ready to play in a home game after a loss?! Coaching staff equally to blame for this dismal outing.

11-21-2005, 08:59 AM	#8
Twilbert07 Impact Rookie Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA Age: 60 Posts: 594	Re: Brunell sucks The bottom line is that Brunell has played some good games and some bad games this season. Either way, though, Gibbs' decision to make him the starter means we start all over at the QB season next season or in 2007. Therefore, we're in for a couple more .500 seasons.

11-21-2005, 09:27 AM	#9
Skinnydo Camp Scrub Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 9	Re: Brunell sucks I predict the Skins will win-out and Brunell will be the MAN! At 11-5 the Skins will not only be in the playoff, but will win the Super Bowl!!! Brunell will be the most valuable player and will, of course, be in the Pro-Bowl and on his way to the Hall of Fame. Whatever you do, do NOT sell Brunell and the Skins short!

11-21-2005, 01:34 PM	#11
skinsguy Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Posts: 6,766	Re: Brunell sucks I would like to see Campbell play ONLY if there was no way for us to make the playoffs. Otherwise, it's foolish to demand Brunell's head on a platter. The guy is a great team leader. __________________ "Fire Up That Diesel!"

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Brunell sucks

Locker Room Main Forum