Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2009, 07:59 PM   #1
Nflnick11
Special Teams
 
Nflnick11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 432
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

4 games, and they both better have atleast one TD catch by then
Nflnick11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 08:30 PM   #2
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

moss 60 cooley 80 - that's only 140 between them. if el gets 60 and kelley/thomas get 40 each, that's 280 completions... hopefully one or both displace el though, cause he's not a good #2.

if one moves to #2 then it should be easy to do, since el will have to give up catches from the above example. we'll see though.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 01:14 AM   #3
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Um, good point. Greg Lewis is trash.

Belichick is up to something. Maybe he just wants to prove to Reid that even a team with Greg Lewis on it can win the super bowl?

Quick, without looking it up: Name Greg Lewis' college receiving corps partner
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 01:20 AM   #4
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Um, good point. Greg Lewis is trash.

Belichick is up to something. Maybe he just wants to prove to Reid that even a team with Greg Lewis on it can win the super bowl?

Quick, without looking it up: Name Greg Lewis' college receiving corps partner
Honestly I don't know what he's up to, because they could've waited until Torry Holt got released.

A few threads back somebody was saying that the Lions are not dumb enough to trade their second 1st rounder (#20) and their 2nd rounder for our #13...well now that I've seen this Greg Lewis trade, I think anything is possible.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 01:28 AM   #5
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

I understand that the Rams offense has been a giant vortex of suck over the last two years, but I must say that Torry Holt's days of being a great, or even an average NFL receiver are in the past. He can't get off a jam to save his life, and he's just not blazing fast anymore, which makes the fact that he's never been a great route runner more obvious.

Holt still has fantastic hands, so somebody will find a place for him, but he doesn't really change the dynamic of your receiving corps, and hopefully, won't be paid like such. He'd be a really interesting slot receiver, but I'm wondering how his ego would take that.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 01:38 AM   #6
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I understand that the Rams offense has been a giant vortex of suck over the last two years, but I must say that Torry Holt's days of being a great, or even an average NFL receiver are in the past. He can't get off a jam to save his life, and he's just not blazing fast anymore, which makes the fact that he's never been a great route runner more obvious.

Holt still has fantastic hands, so somebody will find a place for him, but he doesn't really change the dynamic of your receiving corps, and hopefully, won't be paid like such. He'd be a really interesting slot receiver, but I'm wondering how his ego would take that.
Well the Pats were not looking for a #1 or #2 (Moss and Welker are doing that already), but I could've seen him as their #3 receiver. Holt may have pulled a Springs and play cheap for the chance of a title as well. Honestly, I don't see Holt as a #2 receiver anywhere as well, but I could see him here as a replacement for Thrash.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 03:12 AM   #7
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Let's see what happens you bitches? Mr. Thomas? Mr. Kelly? Bitches..........

Last edited by wilsowilso; 03-11-2009 at 03:44 AM.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 08:17 AM   #8
terpsez11
Camp Scrub
 
terpsez11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill B View Post
OK - lets say the Skins get the same type of production out of Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly this year as they did last. At some point potential has to turn into production and if these two have similar seasons like they did last year how much longer do you keep them on the roster? I know many say WR's need a couple of seasons to develop so I am curious as to how long do the Skins wait for them to produce - 2 years, 3 years, 4 or more?
linking them together is a real mistake..Kelly was hurt..and Thomas improved like a 2nd round receiver..since when do rookies contribute at wideout?..Desean Jackson at Philly caught almost every pass on the same damn McNabb scramble play where he slanted across every seam and was the safety valve..on third down..and he dropped a mess of passes

when will the Skins get some consistent production at QB?...so we can adequately judge the rest of the Offense..people blast our O-linemen and our receiver corp..when it is Jason that plays like he thinks he is still in the SEC
terpsez11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 08:32 AM   #9
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by terpsez11 View Post
linking them together is a real mistake..Kelly was hurt..and Thomas improved like a 2nd round receiver..since when do rookies contribute at wideout?..Desean Jackson at Philly caught almost every pass on the same damn McNabb scramble play where he slanted across every seam and was the safety valve..on third down..and he dropped a mess of passes

when will the Skins get some consistent production at QB?...so we can adequately judge the rest of the Offense..people blast our O-linemen and our receiver corp..when it is Jason that plays like he thinks he is still in the SEC
DeSean Jackson also gave up a TD by spiking the ball before he was in the end zone.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 08:54 AM   #10
terpsez11
Camp Scrub
 
terpsez11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
DeSean Jackson also gave up a TD by spiking the ball before he was in the end zone.
I wasn't trashing Jackson..the Eagles were so desperate at Wideout they had to rush the kid..something Zorn didn't have to do with Antwaan and Santana


if all things remain the same..DeSean will no doubt be a standout..but we would definitely be leary and scrutinizing any receiver that dropped as many balls
terpsez11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 11:13 AM   #11
Bill B
Impact Rookie
 
Bill B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by terpsez11 View Post
linking them together is a real mistake..Kelly was hurt..and Thomas improved like a 2nd round receiver..since when do rookies contribute at wideout?..Desean Jackson at Philly caught almost every pass on the same damn McNabb scramble play where he slanted across every seam and was the safety valve..on third down..and he dropped a mess of passes

when will the Skins get some consistent production at QB?...so we can adequately judge the rest of the Offense..people blast our O-linemen and our receiver corp..when it is Jason that plays like he thinks he is still in the SEC

Terpsez - please see attached list for a few rookie wrs that "contributed".....
Young Targets: An Examination of Rookie WRs - Salvatore Marcoccio III - FF Today

Also - the Skins knew Kelly was inujury prone - combining these two is not a mistake - whether a player is on the field and does not produce or a player that is not on the field due to injury after injury and does not produce - you still get the same result - little to no production either way.
Bill B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 02:32 PM   #12
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,700
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill B View Post
Terpsez - please see attached list for a few rookie wrs that "contributed".....
Young Targets: An Examination of Rookie WRs - Salvatore Marcoccio III - FF Today

Also - the Skins knew Kelly was inujury prone - combining these two is not a mistake - whether a player is on the field and does not produce or a player that is not on the field due to injury after injury and does not produce - you still get the same result - little to no production either way.
Nice article but in it it says:
Quote:
. Of course picking the right rookie is the key factor. Far and away, most rookies don’t even sniff these totals, so let’s look at some factors that may help one find a rookie gem on draft day.

1. Opportunity: Obviously a rookie needs to receive significant time on the field as a prerequisite for putting up stats that lead to fantasy points. A young wide receiver that is going to sit behind veterans will not help your squad. There’s no need to really explore this factor much further, since it’s quite apparent all who appear on the list above must have received an opportunity to see playing time as first year players due to either superior talent or injury to a teammate.
Bottom line really is that last year neither were on the field due to various reasons, including the fact that Moss and ARE were NOT going to be benched out the gate.

This is a good year for the offense to take a maturation step across the board and show that it can win games for us when the D does its job.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 08:59 AM   #13
terpsez11
Camp Scrub
 
terpsez11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

and besides when did Thomas and Kelly rise up on the depth chart?...when they get their real chance...then pass judgement
terpsez11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 09:50 AM   #14
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

I think we've got to give them 3 years. However if Thomas doesn't grow up then I'd cut him in pre season. It's just not worth it to sit around and baby sit guys. This is pro football. I can understand it taking time to start producing on the field. But I don't want to hear anything about not knowing the plays, not knowing where to line up and running routes too short. Be a pro cause that's what you're paid to do.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 10:07 PM   #15
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
I think we've got to give them 3 years. However if Thomas doesn't grow up then I'd cut him in pre season. It's just not worth it to sit around and baby sit guys. This is pro football. I can understand it taking time to start producing on the field. But I don't want to hear anything about not knowing the plays, not knowing where to line up and running routes too short. Be a pro cause that's what you're paid to do.
Wow. Would you have cut Steve Smith after he got into a fight in the film room during his 2nd season? If so you would have cut one of the best WR in the league whose production hadn't yet emerged. Some of you guys really need to eat some reality soup and get a clue. It takes some guys time to develop and yes, to learn how to be a professional! My God, give people a chance to grow into their careers before talking about cutting them in the preseason. SMH.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.62501 seconds with 10 queries