![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
Quote:
See, Brunell2Moss. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 44
Posts: 461
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 957
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
I wasn't referring to your post in particular, I'm just tired of all the knee jerk reactions every time we lose a game. Today's loss was not about play calling it was about execution. Their guys made plays when they had to, ours didn't.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 782
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
It does start at the Lines. If you have dominant lines, you can do anything you want. Just looking at the Offensive line though, what could be the problem? I think pass protection has been wonderful, but of course Gibbs has extra blockers everywhere making it hard to judge.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 782
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
snyder is an intersting fellow
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 782
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
How would another Wideout help Run Blocking?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
Quote:
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
I think it's so easy to whine and say it's the playcalling, but the execution hasn't been up to par lately either. Dropped passes, penalties, turnovers, etc., that's all on the players.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
Quote:
1-10-SD31 (1:04) C.Portis to SD 25 for 6 yards (B.Jue, D.Florence). 2-4-SD25 (:55) C.Portis right end to SD 25 for no gain (L.Castillo). PENALTY on WAS-C.Rabach, Offensive Holding, 10 yards, enforced at SD 25 - No Play. 2-14-SD35 (:50) C.Portis left end to SD 35 for no gain (R.Godfrey). 3-14-SD35 (:40) M.Brunell pass incomplete to C.Cooley (S.Merriman). 4-14-SD35 (:35) J.Hall 52 yard field goal is No Good, Wide Right, Center-E.Albright, Holder-D.Frost. From the 35 you are out of FG range. The highlighted playcall on 2nd and 14 is asinine to me. To me that is giving up on the drive by conceding 3rd and long and a long FG attempt. Are there no plays in the playbook designed to gain 7-10 yds?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
Quote:
While I agree that the playcalling has generally been unimaginative and predictable, weren't a lot of us bitching last week in the 4th quarter against the Raiders for NOT running Portis enough? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: My 1st anti-coaching thread
Quote:
While there has been far too much of what you mention, playcalling figures into the mix as well. There is far too much of what we saw last year, throwing the ball two to three yards short of the first down marker. I wouldn't suggest throwing a hook pattern two yards short of the 1st down with the receiver not being able to run after the catch for the needed yardage. Plus the whole offensive scheme at times lacks creativeness as well as imagination. It appears to be an offense with limited plays because we seem to be so predictable, and from what I witness rather easy to defend. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|