![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#61 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
I think in the case of Sproles, he's been demanding big money and the Chargers (namely AJ Smith) are trying to prove to him that he's not worth that much
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#62 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
That makes sense. I also saw an interesting take on SD not tendering Sproles, that had to do with the Colts. If they tender him, than any team can match and sign, BUT if he is untendered than the final 8 teams can't sign him unless they lose an equivalent. Thus Indy couldn't sign Sproles, unless they lost either Brackett or their other UFA at about the equivalent contract.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
It's what I would do in the same situation, but do you think there's a chance that Sproles takes a very similar offer from a different team out of spite?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
I really think we should cut Rock and Randel El and just go ahead and sign sproles because thats one player that can do 2 of there jobs (punt returns[el] and kick returns [rock]) as well as 3rd down running back.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
How is Rotoworld in terms of reporting on rumors? They have us linked ot Darren Sproles.
And Over there on Extreme Skins they pretty much have us linked to everyone. LOL Darren Sproles
__________________
Just win. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
Sproles = Morton 2.0
__________________
That got ugly fast |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OCEAN PINES, MD
Posts: 121
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 886
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
id like Sproles.. and i still want a rookie to contend as well.
But Portis, Sproles, and a Rookie of his choice would give Shanahan alot to work with.
__________________
ALL HAIL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
it seems this is going to be 2000 all over. Interest in Sproles, Robinson, Peppers, Dansby, Clifton...I mean seriously. Its just ridiculous. I dont know where the talk is coming from, but George Allen never worked this way in previous destinations. He built some solid teams in Oakland and Tampa with the draft by adding a FEW veteran FA. This just had Danny's little paw prints all over it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
Quote:
Regardless, Sproles, Robinson & Dansby is far from a repeat of 2000 where we signed players at the end of their careers.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,839
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
Quote:
Signing one, two or even many of these names would not mean that the OL was not being addressed as it has in the salary cap era. Indeed, you can make a case that by filling these needs with upgraded FA talent, you open the draft to filling more of the most needed areas (OL/QB) with top young talent. Of course we may not sign anyone, wouldn't that be a hoot. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Would Dunta Robinson & Darren Sproles be 'business as usual'?
Quote:
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|