Super Bowl LII Thread

[DynamiteRave]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Way too soon to say that.

Pats been shooting themselves in the foot all game. They gonna pull an ATL this year too? Doubtful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by DynamiteRave

Pats been shooting themselves in the foot all game. They gonna pull an ATL this year too? Doubtful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

10 points game. Nothing is doubtful yet.
Except the quality of the halftime show.

Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk

[DynamiteRave]

Originally Posted by FrenchSkin

10 points game. Nothing is doubtful yet.
Except the quality of the halftime show.

Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk

Lol it wasn’t a boob popping out at least?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jamf]

Gruden calling plays for the pats?

[NC_Skins]

...and right on queue. Refs bailing out the Patriots on a 3rd down conversion.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

...and right on queue. Refs bailing out the Patriots on a 3rd down conversion.

Eagle guard #79 been holding all night.

[DynamiteRave]

The Pats secondary is bad. Phew, I thought we stunk lol baaaad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[NC_Skins]

The fucking balls on Pederson to call the exact same play call BB did.....but this one worked.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

The fucking balls on Pederson to call the exact same play call BB did.....but this one worked.

It was an "illegal play".............(formation)

https://www.upi.com/https:/www.upi.c...5261518481746/

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by Giantone

It was an "illegal play".............(formation)

https://www.upi.com/https:/www.upi.c...5261518481746/

Before the play, you can see the receiver checking with the official if he's on the line of scrimmage, the judge doesn't make the signal that he's in the backfield.
So the formation was deemed legal.

It would have been illegal if the judge had his arm extended toward the backfield, signaling the receiver was in the backfield.
Anyway, it didn't create another eligible receiver, since the man at the end of the line had an ineligible number, and would have had to report as eligible to the officials to be eligible. That wasn't the case.

So it's not like it created one more receiver to cover. It didn't change anything for the defense.

And again, on many plays you could say the receiver, or the tight end, or the tackle is lined up in the backfield, ultimately, the signal of the side judge is the reference for everybody. (Players and officials).

So once the official didn't make the signal that the receiver was in the backfield, there was no flag to be thrown.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by FrenchSkin

Before the play, you can see the receiver checking with the official if he's on the line of scrimmage, the judge doesn't make the signal that he's in the backfield.
So the formation was deemed legal.

It would have been illegal if the judge had his arm extended toward the backfield, signaling the receiver was in the backfield.
Anyway, it didn't create another eligible receiver, since the man at the end of the line had an ineligible number, and would have had to report as eligible to the officials to be eligible. That wasn't the case.

So it's not like it created one more receiver to cover. It didn't change anything for the defense.

And again, on many plays you could say the receiver, or the tight end, or the tackle is lined up in the backfield, ultimately, the signal of the side judge is the reference for everybody. (Players and officials).

So once the official didn't make the signal that the receiver was in the backfield, there was no flag to be thrown.

I'm sticking with the expert on this one..


"FOX rules analyst and former NFL official Mike Pereira said Monday on a podcast that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Nick Foles' fourth-down touchdown in Super Bowl LII was an illegal play."

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I'm sticking with the expert on this one..


"FOX rules analyst and former NFL official Mike Pereira said Monday on a podcast that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Nick Foles' fourth-down touchdown in Super Bowl LII was an illegal play."

Yeah the judge should have signaled the receiver to be in the backfield, making it an illegal formation, but once he didn't after the receiver checked towards him the play was legal.

Plus even Pereira says "It’s kind of one of those that has no effect on the play. I get it. But they didn’t line up properly." ... Well Mike you could say that on a LOOOT of plays, I don't get undermining the officials work on insignificant details like that!

Mike Pereira: Eagles were in illegal formation on Philly Special – ProFootballTalk

[HailGreen28]

I don’t like the score, but a wild game so far.

[Brody81]

It’s sad, but I don’t see the BG getting back to the SB with DS as the owner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by Brody81

It’s sad, but I don’t see the BG getting back to the SB with DS as the owner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Snyder is around 53 years old. With our luck, he will outlive Al Davis.

Gonna be a long 30 years.....