Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins - Losers?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2006, 12:46 PM   #1
backrow
The Starter
 
backrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 73
Posts: 1,812
Redskins - Losers?

Free agency winners and losers
Teams that hit it big or wildly missed this offseason
Posted: Tuesday March 21, 2006 12:05PM; Updated: Tuesday March 21, 2006 12:13PM


I'm unable to post the link to CNNSI, but Don Banks labels the B&G losers! Actually, I don't know how to post a link! Sorry!

Hopefully a moderator can add it later.


Did I miss a memo on us losing in FA or something?

Is Don Banks now doing his best Fat Lenny, or P. King?
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
backrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 12:49 PM   #2
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: Redskins - Losers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by backrow
I'm unable to post the link to CNNSI, but Don Banks labels the B&G losers! Actually, I don't know how to post a link! Sorry!
It's real easy, backrow. Just copy and paste the URL from your browser.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 12:49 PM   #3
RobH4413
Wildcard Bitches
 
RobH4413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 2,638
Re: Redskins - Losers?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ers/index.html
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!
RobH4413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 12:56 PM   #4
backrow
The Starter
 
backrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 73
Posts: 1,812
Re: Redskins - Losers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10
It's real easy, backrow. Just copy and paste the URL from your browser.
I can bring the news, but I can't bring any skills to the computer table! I've heard the term URL, but I can't find that button on the keyboard. The mouse doesn't have any voice, so, I'm at a loss. I've disabled my speakers because I can't stand dings, bells and or whistles.

Now, due to watching the screen for so long, my eyes are going bad. I had to upgrade my reading glasses a while back.

I get stiff while sitting for long periods. My knees won't cooperate on steps. I get Arthur in my thumbs.

My hair is grey/white, and thinning.


Help, I've fallen, and can't get up!
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
backrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 02:19 PM   #5
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: Redskins - Losers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by backrow
I can bring the news, but I can't bring any skills to the computer table! I've heard the term URL, but I can't find that button on the keyboard. The mouse doesn't have any voice, so, I'm at a loss. I've disabled my speakers because I can't stand dings, bells and or whistles.

Now, due to watching the screen for so long, my eyes are going bad. I had to upgrade my reading glasses a while back.

I get stiff while sitting for long periods. My knees won't cooperate on steps. I get Arthur in my thumbs.

My hair is grey/white, and thinning.


Help, I've fallen, and can't get up!
if your eyes seriously do bother you, consider upping the refresh rate on your monitor or buying an LCD.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 07:39 AM   #6
backrow
The Starter
 
backrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 73
Posts: 1,812
Re: Redskins - Losers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
if your eyes seriously do bother you, consider upping the refresh rate on your monitor or buying an LCD.

Thanks TG!

But I reach the big 55 mph speed limit this year. I believe it's AGE that is getting to me!

On the screen thingy, it's work-owned. Big gov't contract and all. No choice.
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
backrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 06:49 PM   #7
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
Re: Redskins - Losers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by backrow
I can bring the news, but I can't bring any skills to the computer table! I've heard the term URL, but I can't find that button on the keyboard. The mouse doesn't have any voice, so, I'm at a loss. I've disabled my speakers because I can't stand dings, bells and or whistles.

Now, due to watching the screen for so long, my eyes are going bad. I had to upgrade my reading glasses a while back.

I get stiff while sitting for long periods. My knees won't cooperate on steps. I get Arthur in my thumbs.

My hair is grey/white, and thinning.


Help, I've fallen, and can't get up!
Haha...its ok. A URL is the address to the website. Like if you go to yahoo, you type in www.yahoo.com in the box at the top. What you would do to put the link on a post, is to go up to that box, and to copy what is the box, and put in the post.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 08:07 AM   #8
backrow
The Starter
 
backrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 73
Posts: 1,812
Re: Redskins - Losers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins
that box

OK, where is this "box" hiding when I don't have the Search mode open on the left side?

Goodness, gracious, I'm asking a Boohoo! How is that work-release probation, home-incarceration, shock collar thing working for you?
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
backrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 12:49 PM   #9
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
Re: Redskins - Losers?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ers/index.html

there you go
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 12:50 PM   #10
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
Re: Redskins - Losers?

robh you son of a bitch. You must have been 3 seconds before me...
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 01:00 PM   #11
RobH4413
Wildcard Bitches
 
RobH4413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 2,638
Re: Redskins - Losers?

"Even reserve tight end Fauria and backup quarterback Todd Collins got in on the money train."

Collins gets a two year 2.5 million$ deal (chooo chooo!?!?!)...
and fauria gets 800,000 in 2006 and 1 million in 2007....


any other questions visit

http://www.thehogs.net/content/story.php?id=672

This guy is reading headlines and not looking into any facts.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!
RobH4413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 01:09 PM   #12
Monksdown
The Starter
 
Monksdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
Re: Redskins - Losers?

My favorite is one paragraph implying that the Antwaan deal was a poor one for us. And then the next paragraph he criticizes Pittsburgh for losing his him.

Do what?
Monksdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 01:30 PM   #13
memphisskin
Impact Rookie
 
memphisskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 53
Posts: 960
Re: Redskins - Losers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monksdown
My favorite is one paragraph implying that the Antwaan deal was a poor one for us. And then the next paragraph he criticizes Pittsburgh for losing his him.

Do what?
You just can't win with these guys for a reason. Most of the writers for SI, ESPN and the like started off as beat writers, and at times their roots as homers come shining through. This definitely explains Peter King's anti-Skin bias, he covered the Giants for years. I mean King defends keeping Monk out of the Hall of Fame by saying that "Gary Clark was a bigger threat" all while forgetting that it was the quiet excellence of Monk who allowed Clark, Brown, Sanders, and all the other big play threats to do their jobs while he only caught the most balls in NFL history up to that point.

As for winners and losers in free agency, to put the Skins down as losers because they've figured out a way to keep attaining free agents and avoid the cap hell that has plagued other teams is ludicrous and I attribute it to one thing. Hate. The league hates Snyder because he took the Skins and made them the most profitable team in the league, because his revenue streams allow him to dish out $5 and $10 mil signing bonuses like bottled water while other franchises try to get the same results on the cheap.
memphisskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 12:52 PM   #14
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
Re: Redskins - Losers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Dumbass
4. Washington -- The Redskins were saved from salary-cap hell by the new CBA extension, which freed up another $7 million-plus of cap space, allowing them to avoid dismantling their roster. So what do they do? Rush right out and get themselves mortgaged back up to the gills, tossing out a staggering $31.8 million, six-year contract to the Rams' Adam Archuleta, making him the richest safety in NFL history.

Receiver Antwaan Randle El and linebacker Andre Carter also got hefty deals, and Washington opted to send both a third- and fourth-round pick to San Francisco in exchange for inconsistent receiver Brandon Lloyd. Even reserve tight end Fauria and backup quarterback Todd Collins got in on the money train.

The Redskins' set-the-market contracts are bound to catch up to them one day. My guess is it'll be after head coach Joe Gibbs calls it a career for a second time, in a year or two.
d
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 01:00 PM   #15
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Redskins - Losers?

I read the article and his only reason for the skins to be a "loser" is that we spent money! This writter has no idea about how to look at moves in a football type manner. Our moves will help us to win games, point blank. I guess he is just bothered that Snyder and the skins can spend what he makes in a lifetime in a blink of an eye.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.48971 seconds with 10 queries