How are we replacing Dockery?

jsarno · 04-24-2007, 05:53 PM

All this draft talk has gotten us off track...what are we planning to do about the fact that we have a huge hole to fill at guard?

skinsfan_nn · 04-24-2007, 05:58 PM

Todd Wade is the front runner.

skinsfan_nn · 04-24-2007, 06:05 PM

WADE: http://www.redskins.com/team/profile.jsp?id=349

Daseal · 04-24-2007, 06:44 PM

I'm really not sold on Wade as a replacement for Dockery. I think he's going to be quite a downgrade. Maybe somewhere in the draft we could get a LG prospect.

ArtMonkDrillz · 04-24-2007, 06:55 PM

With mirrors and slight of hand.

Seriously, I guess Wade and a late round pick.

wilsowilso · 04-24-2007, 07:03 PM

A huge hole at one of the guard spots is what 75% of NFL teams have. The position is filled by late rounders and unsigned free agents across the league. We have downgraded, but I just don't think that it really matters especially because the other four returning guys are all very good players.

jsarno · 04-24-2007, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

A huge hole at one of the guard spots is what 75% of NFL teams have. The position is filled by late rounders and unsigned free agents across the league. We have downgraded, but I just don't think that it really matters especially because the other four returning guys are all very good players.

That's what we've said before then paid for it. I hope this doesn't really kill our line.

FRPLG · 04-24-2007, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

I'm really not sold on Wade as a replacement for Dockery. I think he's going to be quite a downgrade. Maybe somewhere in the draft we could get a LG prospect.

When healthy Wade is an above average left tackle. He is athletic and has very good technique. I think he is actually a significant upgrade over Dock. Sorry but Dock was only an average guard. Good run blocker but only below average pass blocker. Didn't pull all that athletically and made mental mistakes. I wanted to keep Dock for the sake of chemistry but Buffalo gave not just way too much but ridiculously too much. Wade will slid over and be fine. Durability is the issue.

jsarno · 04-24-2007, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

When healthy Wade is an above average left tackle. He is athletic and has very good technique. I think he is actually a significant upgrade over Dock. Sorry but Dock was only an average guard. Good run blocker but only below average pass blocker. Didn't pull all that athletically and made mental mistakes. I wanted to keep Dock for the sake of chemistry but Buffalo gave not just way too much but ridiculously too much. Wade will slid over and be fine. Durability is the issue.

Wow, I am very surprised at that comment. Dockery did a very good job last year, I just don't see Wade filling his shoes. But I hope you're right.

MTK · 04-24-2007, 09:06 PM

Dock was solid but nothing overly special. Certainly not worth $49M that's for sure. I think Wade is a good short-term solution.

skinsfan_nn · 04-24-2007, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Dock was solid but nothing overly special. Certainly not worth $49M that's for sure. I think Wade is a good short-term solution.

Agree

Gmanc711 · 04-24-2007, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

I'm really not sold on Wade as a replacement for Dockery. I think he's going to be quite a downgrade. Maybe somewhere in the draft we could get a LG prospect.

Well I agree that I'm not 100% sold on Wade, but I would have to think that anyone we would draft wouldnt start anyways.

backrow · 04-24-2007, 10:25 PM

Switch Wade to Jansens spot, and Jansen to the LG spot. Or, not!

Durability is an issue for Wade. Hope he holds up.

skinsguy · 04-24-2007, 10:33 PM

I think Wade will be ok for us.

Longtimefan · 04-24-2007, 10:46 PM

Looks like Wade is going to be the man, and before I go off talking about what he can, or cannot do or be, I'm going to wait for him to prove he can't do the job. If he proves he can't do the job then we'll look elsewhere, but until then, I have faith he can be the man.

04-24-2007, 05:53 PM	#1
jsarno Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: 31 Spooner St. Age: 50 Posts: 9,534	How are we replacing Dockery? All this draft talk has gotten us off track...what are we planning to do about the fact that we have a huge hole to fill at guard? __________________ Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin

04-24-2007, 05:58 PM	#2
skinsfan_nn Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Newport News,Virginia Age: 60 Posts: 4,495	Re: How are we replacing Dockery? Todd Wade is the front runner. __________________ "There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!

04-24-2007, 06:05 PM	#3
skinsfan_nn Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Newport News,Virginia Age: 60 Posts: 4,495	Re: How are we replacing Dockery? WADE: http://www.redskins.com/team/profile.jsp?id=349 __________________ "There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!

04-24-2007, 06:44 PM	#4
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 42 Posts: 8,341	Re: How are we replacing Dockery? I'm really not sold on Wade as a replacement for Dockery. I think he's going to be quite a downgrade. Maybe somewhere in the draft we could get a LG prospect. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

04-24-2007, 06:55 PM	#5
ArtMonkDrillz Franchise Player Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Ellicott City, MD Age: 42 Posts: 8,029	Re: How are we replacing Dockery? With mirrors and slight of hand. Seriously, I guess Wade and a late round pick. __________________ "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude

04-24-2007, 07:03 PM	#6
wilsowilso Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Los Angeles Age: 52 Posts: 2,841	Re: How are we replacing Dockery? A huge hole at one of the guard spots is what 75% of NFL teams have. The position is filled by late rounders and unsigned free agents across the league. We have downgraded, but I just don't think that it really matters especially because the other four returning guys are all very good players.

04-24-2007, 09:06 PM	#10
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,831	Re: How are we replacing Dockery? Dock was solid but nothing overly special. Certainly not worth $49M that's for sure. I think Wade is a good short-term solution. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

04-24-2007, 10:25 PM	#13
backrow The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: 36.28 x 76.22 Age: 73 Posts: 1,812	Re: How are we replacing Dockery? Switch Wade to Jansens spot, and Jansen to the LG spot. Or, not! Durability is an issue for Wade. Hope he holds up. __________________ '37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!

04-24-2007, 10:33 PM	#14
skinsguy Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Posts: 6,766	Re: How are we replacing Dockery? I think Wade will be ok for us. __________________ "Fire Up That Diesel!"

04-24-2007, 10:46 PM	#15
Longtimefan Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Germantown, Md. Posts: 4,832	Re: How are we replacing Dockery? Looks like Wade is going to be the man, and before I go off talking about what he can, or cannot do or be, I'm going to wait for him to prove he can't do the job. If he proves he can't do the job then we'll look elsewhere, but until then, I have faith he can be the man. __________________ A revolution is coming and it will be televised.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

How are we replacing Dockery?

Locker Room Main Forum