|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-10-2004, 04:36 PM
|
#1 |
|
Serenity Now
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
|
Brunell over/under
Yesterday on PTI, they played over/under. One of the topics was "Brunell will throw for 100 yards this week."
Kornheiser said it was an easy choice - under - due to the Redskins struggles and the fact they are facing defensive guru Marvin Lewis this week, who also happens to know a lot about Redskins' personnel. Wilbon was a little more supportive (as usual). He took the over and predicted Brunell would throw for 180 yards. What do you guys think? I will (very hesitantly) take the over. |
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
11-10-2004, 04:39 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
|
108 over
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 04:40 PM
|
#3 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Not a chance. Take the under.
Last week the protection was good, we had a strong running game that would cause defenses to stay closer to the line, and the Lions had the 29th rated pass defense. For all that, we got 58 lousy yards passing. Trust me, take the under. |
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 04:40 PM
|
#4 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
i can't believe we even have to have this discussion
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 04:44 PM
|
#5 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 6
|
Unfortunately, the under.....about 94 yds. The Skins will rush for a bunch though!
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 04:44 PM
|
#6 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Under.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 04:49 PM
|
#7 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
"Brunell will throw for 100 yards this week"
Sure he will, if you count yards thrown in practice during the week Seriously though, I'll take the over at 115
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 05:02 PM
|
#8 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
U
N D E R |
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 05:07 PM
|
#9 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 890
|
he'd have more INTS except he's so inaccurate the ball doesn't even go near the defenders either...
but i'll still go with over and a pick |
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 05:08 PM
|
#10 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,348
|
over, they should be able to put up some points, then the skins will have to come from behind and pass alot like in the dallas game.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 05:15 PM
|
#11 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 129
|
Under, I think he only plays the 1st half. I think this is the game where we will finally see #11. Brunnells frisbee passes are not cutting it.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 05:17 PM
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
under, i'd take portis for 180 though...
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 05:20 PM
|
#13 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaVale MD
Age: 63
Posts: 515
|
I'm going with under. I've gotten the impression that Coach Gibbs is interested in minimizing mistakes and I don't think he really has as much confidence in the passing game with Brunell as he lets on.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 06:49 PM
|
#14 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Ehh I dont know. 100 yards really isnt that hard to get... MARK , So you shouldnt be under 100 3/4 weeks.
Umm.... I dont know if I had a gun to my head I'd proboly take the over, but I still dont expect to see anything majorly different from him. It all depends on how the game unfolds.
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
11-10-2004, 07:10 PM
|
#15 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 395
|
under. Gibbs won't call a lot of pass plays unless we are really losing.
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
