Day 3 NFL Draft 2016 Rounds 4-7

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Looking back trading for Carrier was not a good move at all. There had to be a guy on the street that could have come in and played just as good as he did.

Well looking back after the fact you can say this. However, I'm sure Scot thought of acquiring a player he knew, as opposed to just a "guy off the street."

[DYoungJelly]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Looking back trading for Carrier was not a good move at all. There had to be a guy on the street that could have come in and played just as good as he did.

Agree with Rush, Cooley was basically begging Snyder and Allen to be signed and they passed. I don't think there were many options at the time.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by DYoungJelly

Agree with Rush, Cooley was basically begging Snyder and Allen to be signed and they passed. I don't think there were many options at the time.

Yeah he filled an immediate need at the moment and you cant sign a guy "off the street". Its not like there are serviceable tight ends just walkin around ready to suit up.

[JoeRedskin]

Also, remember, we weren't the only scrounging for TE's last year. Baltimore lost their top two TE's as well (I think they lost a third at some point).

[punch it in]

This year we shouldn't be looking for bodies - Davis, Reed, Carrier, Paulsen, Paul. Someone is gone. Carrier or Paulsen?

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

Originally Posted by punch it in

This year we shouldn't be looking for bodies - Davis, Reed, Carrier, Paulsen, Paul. Someone is gone. Carrier or Paulsen?

Will Carrier be healthy?

My other thought is Paulsen move to more of the FB/TE position to open holes.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07

Will Carrier be healthy?

My other thought is Paulsen move to more of the FB/TE position to open holes.

Actually they think carrier will begin the season on the pup list. So that sux.