Kirk Cousins 365 thread

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by mooby

He had to shut it down before it had 1500 posts in it too, those are rookie numbers. Matty is the Alex Smith of moderators.

He's definitely reached his ceiling. He is who I thought he was!!

[MTK]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

What, closing the other thread just before 100 pages? MTK is a game manager moderator.

It's only true if Bucky Brooks says it.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by MTK

It's only true if Bucky Brooks says it.

LOL. I am not upset about a new thread, but I am a little upset that he is gone. I was initially trying to reason with him but it quickly became apparent that was not an option. His posts were hysterical though.

Post one - You guys are so stupid and immature that why do you even listen to me? I mean who cares what ai post? Post an opinion just so you guys can bully me? Fuck. U. Scumbag.

(Wait five seconds)

Post two - I cant believe how angry u guys are.

That shit was seriously entertaining and disturbing at its finest.

[metalskins]

What are the odds that we'd see some weird situation happen to where the Chargers and the 49ers get into a bidding war for Kirk Cousins? Such as, the 'skins decide they're doing a nonexclusive tag on Kirk, the 49ers and Chargers get into a bidding war, because Kyle Shanahan is going to want Cousins, and Rivers seems like he may ask to be traded, so the Chargers would need a quarterback. The Redskins could sit back and say, OK, we're not matching either offer, but here's the deal, Chargers, you can have Kirk for a trade for Rivers and a draft pick of some sorts, 9er's, you HAVE to give us your two first rounders.

Either way, I could probably be on board if we HAVE to let Kirk go. I'd rather have a proven franchise QB, and Rivers would be that guy, but then again, you're talking about a very high, first round pick from the 49ers that the Redskins could probably choose the best QB available.


I guess I'm a little skeptical that the Redskins are going to offer enough for Cousins to want to stay in Washington, especially if the Redskins don't tag him at all. Who knows? That's why I work for a college in NC in IT and not for the Washington Redskins negotiating contracts.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by metalskins

What are the odds that we'd see some weird situation happen to where the Chargers and the 49ers get into a bidding war for Kirk Cousins? Such as, the 'skins decide they're doing a nonexclusive tag on Kirk, the 49ers and Chargers get into a bidding war, because Kyle Shanahan is going to want Cousins, and Rivers seems like he may ask to be traded, so the Chargers would need a quarterback. The Redskins could sit back and say, OK, we're not matching either offer, but here's the deal, Chargers, you can have Kirk for a trade for Rivers and a draft pick of some sorts, 9er's, you HAVE to give us your two first rounders.

Either way, I could probably be on board if we HAVE to let Kirk go. I'd rather have a proven franchise QB, and Rivers would be that guy, but then again, you're talking about a very high, first round pick from the 49ers that the Redskins could probably choose the best QB available.


I guess I'm a little skeptical that the Redskins are going to offer enough for Cousins to want to stay in Washington, especially if the Redskins don't tag him at all. Who knows? That's why I work for a college in NC in IT and not for the Washington Redskins negotiating contracts.

Rivers is too old to build around. We're still a year or 2 away. If for some reason Cousins isn't on the team next year I want a young qb to start next year.

[Kope]

Okay so after 3 years of the Grud, 2 years of SM and 2 Years of KC, hear is where I am in the whole Cousins deal:

I am fine if we keep Cousins and he is paid long term (I prefer this, in fact).

I am also OK if Cousins gets traded for a couple of high picks and/or legit players.

I was surprised when I came to this realization in the week after the giants game. I am Gruden fan, SM fan and a KC fan. But I am not a KC fan at the expense of the entire team.

KC can win SBs here if the rest of the team is stout. He can also be Dan Fouts and Dan Marino tons of offense that can't win championships. I would rather see more championships than fantasy wasta.

To reiterate: I want to see long term deal where KC stays and wins a ton. But I am strangely OK with letting him walk if we get a good price. I love the direction the team is headed and firmly believe all we need is a couple more years to compete consistently.

side note, to those being hyper critical of living through a rebuild: I mean FFS - this is the first year we were in every game but 1 against a division champs schedule since...since....I don't know when..91 probably, and we won more than lost! Why cant we simply enjoy the progress....httr

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by MTK

It's only true if Bucky Brooks says it.

the man is Jesus to some...

Who was the turd that Sandtrap worshipped?

[MTK]

He was a natural born thread killer.

[sdskinsfan2001]

This thread is a spoof of the past one lol. Haven't even talked about Cousins yet.

It's going to be fun constantly checking for updates for the next couple months regarding his contract situation.

[J. Falcon]

I believe Rivers already said he doesn't mind moving to LA and is not going to request a trade. Anyway Rivers is already 35 years old, how much longer do you think he'll play?

[metalskins]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

I believe Rivers already said he doesn't mind moving to LA and is not going to request a trade. Anyway Rivers is already 35 years old, how much longer do you think he'll play?

I've heard both. And keep in mind, I'm just throwing that out there as a hypothetical. At least trying to get this thread back on track of Cousins talk. Should we lose Cousins, I just want something in return. If we lose him without tagging him, then we're probably looking for a new head coach as well. Which, who knows, might be a good thing in the end, but I think Gruden has proven to be a better head coach than what we've had in several years, so I'd hate to mess up continuity.

[Redskins247]

Just heard Dan Patrick discussing the "what if" scenario of Kyle becoming head coach of 49er's and trading their high 1st round pick for Cousins. I really don't think that WOULD happen...nor would I want it to. IMO there isn't a great QB in this draft and we'd probably be going with McCoy as the starter for next season. I don't see a likely scenario of anything outside of paying a LOT of $$$ for Kirk.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Redskins247

Just heard Dan Patrick discussing the "what if" scenario of Kyle becoming head coach of 49er's and trading their high 1st round pick for Cousins. I really don't think that WOULD happen...nor would I want it to. IMO there isn't a great QB in this draft and we'd probably be going with McCoy as the starter for next season. I don't see a likely scenario of anything outside of paying a LOT of $$$ for Kirk.

I think Dan is probably going off that garbage article on PFT article last night....him and Florio have a working relationship on Sunday night football and brings on Shit-Flor-Brains every now and again to give him a lil boost.

[Chief X_Phackter]

So when can a franchise tagged player and the team begin contract negotiations. I was thinking it was after the last regular season game, but I think someone on here said maybe after the Super Bowl. Anyone know the rule?

[metalskins]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

So when can a franchise tagged player and the team begin contract negotiations. I was thinking it was after the last regular season game, but I think someone on here said maybe after the Super Bowl. Anyone know the rule?

I thought it was after the last regular season game as well, but others seem to think after the Super Bowl. Either way, in a couple of weeks, we should start hearing something about contract talks.