Core group to be competitive-Worst case

RedskinPete · 03-01-2006, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintrain

I'm sure it was part of Lord Gibbs evil master plan to rid the Redskins of Ramsey by structuring the deal that way since he knew the CBA wouldn't be extended.. (insert maniacal laughter and a Monty Burns-esque 'Excellent' here)

lets face facts a 34 year old QB will not last long with out help if we have to cut all these guys? The 06 season many be time to let a young QB ready himself for 07! GOOOOOOOOCampbell!!!!!!

RedskinPete · 03-01-2006, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

sixteenth time, no, cutting brunell costs 300k more than keeping him and keeping ramsey costs almost 1.7mill more than dumping him. if we got a new CBA then it'd be flipped. but right now we don't, so that's nto an option.

Thanks so he[Burnell] is sitting pretty!!! Well lets say that this happens and all these players have to be cut. Wouldn't you say the best way to look at this is not what we can get out of the 06 season but what will be left to rebuild in 07. So keep young talent and pass on guys that will be too old! So looking at the bottom line is not the only thing to look at!

Schneed10 · 03-01-2006, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedskinPete

Is cutting Burnell a better thing for the cap and keeping Ramsey? If so it seems like a better idea so maybe we could keep others!

Can't cut Brunell. It would cost us more to cut him than to keep him. Have to let Ramsey go.

That Guy · 03-01-2006, 11:06 AM

we won't have a choice, we'll have to let just about everyone go.

springs, griffin, lavar will be forced to stay due to their contracts.

Huddle · 03-01-2006, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

we won't have a choice, we'll have to let just about everyone go.

springs, griffin, lavar will be forced to stay due to their contracts.

AND BRUNELL !!! How many times must we explain this to you? (insert smiley face)

RedskinPete · 03-01-2006, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huddle

AND BRUNELL !!! How many times must we explain this to you? (insert smiley face)

I was happy to see Burnell help the Skins out!!! Way to be a team leader Mark!!!

bertoskins · 03-02-2006, 09:53 AM

please spare mike sellers from the cut list

JWsleep · 03-02-2006, 12:51 PM

Ugh. That's all I have to say. Ugh.

dmek25 · 03-02-2006, 02:45 PM

we are about to basically gut our team and berto is only worried about mike sellers?

03-01-2006, 11:06 AM	#4
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,620	Re: Core group to be competitive-Worst case we won't have a choice, we'll have to let just about everyone go. springs, griffin, lavar will be forced to stay due to their contracts.

03-02-2006, 09:53 AM	#7
bertoskins Special Teams Join Date: May 2004 Location: philippines Age: 51 Posts: 184	Re: Core group to be competitive-Worst case please spare mike sellers from the cut list

03-02-2006, 12:51 PM	#8
JWsleep Propane and propane accessories Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, TX Age: 56 Posts: 4,719	Re: Core group to be competitive-Worst case Ugh. That's all I have to say. Ugh. __________________ Hail from Houston!

03-02-2006, 02:45 PM	#9
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 63 Posts: 10,672	Re: Core group to be competitive-Worst case we are about to basically gut our team and berto is only worried about mike sellers? __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

Core group to be competitive-Worst case

Locker Room Main Forum