Sportsline Power Rankings

Gmanc711 · 04-05-2006, 07:21 PM

My main problem with this ranking is that the guy thinks we got worse somehow during the offseason. We lost LaVar, yes, and that is a crucial loss, but we upgraded (and overpayed imo) at Saftey, Wide Reciver, and on the defensive line. Our depth at offensive line is now better as well, which could be vital if we suffer a crucial injury, like that of Randy Thomas. The only position I think you can argue we got substancialy worse at (OLB is still a wildcard at this point), is tight end, and thats only because I havent seen much of Christian Furia. I liked Royal a lot, but he wasent an all-star or anything and we might even have improved there.

Overall I just dont see how, given current offseason moves the Cowboys and Eagles suddenly became better than we did. I'm very confident that the additions of Randel El and Lloyd will make just as big of an impact as T.O. on the Cowboys. Thats not to say they are better than he is, but in terms of gameplan and winning games, I think that is offset. The Eagles, I just dont think are very good anymore, bottom line. I still think the Giants are a solid football team and I'll listen to the argument they are better, hell I'll even listen to the argument that Dallas could be better, but not in the ways that this guy is describing it.

D'BOYZ · 04-06-2006, 12:18 PM

God I'm getting bored with this subject ok the difference between the Keyshawn cut and the Lloyd trade is that Dallas had allready a contract in principle with TO when they kut KJ that's why they cut him after Phi cut TO in the case of Lloyd he was traded way before SF had an option they wated 3 weeks before they sign Bryant, Randall el and Branch got contracts before Bryant did.

That's because he wasn't their first option.

but really what are we still talking about this subject I'm not saying they were bad pic ups I' ve allways have said that you over paid but that's nothing new with your franchise and that Randall-el will not be a #2 receiver I see more potential in Lloyd on becoming the #2 than Randall, he's just a gimmic distraction type of wr.

This 2 guys will give teams missmatches and has made your offense more explosive.

04-05-2006, 07:21 PM	#1
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	Re: Sportsline Power Rankings My main problem with this ranking is that the guy thinks we got worse somehow during the offseason. We lost LaVar, yes, and that is a crucial loss, but we upgraded (and overpayed imo) at Saftey, Wide Reciver, and on the defensive line. Our depth at offensive line is now better as well, which could be vital if we suffer a crucial injury, like that of Randy Thomas. The only position I think you can argue we got substancialy worse at (OLB is still a wildcard at this point), is tight end, and thats only because I havent seen much of Christian Furia. I liked Royal a lot, but he wasent an all-star or anything and we might even have improved there. Overall I just dont see how, given current offseason moves the Cowboys and Eagles suddenly became better than we did. I'm very confident that the additions of Randel El and Lloyd will make just as big of an impact as T.O. on the Cowboys. Thats not to say they are better than he is, but in terms of gameplan and winning games, I think that is offset. The Eagles, I just dont think are very good anymore, bottom line. I still think the Giants are a solid football team and I'll listen to the argument they are better, hell I'll even listen to the argument that Dallas could be better, but not in the ways that this guy is describing it. __________________ #21

04-06-2006, 12:18 PM	#2
D'BOYZ The Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,363	Re: Sportsline Power Rankings God I'm getting bored with this subject ok the difference between the Keyshawn cut and the Lloyd trade is that Dallas had allready a contract in principle with TO when they kut KJ that's why they cut him after Phi cut TO in the case of Lloyd he was traded way before SF had an option they wated 3 weeks before they sign Bryant, Randall el and Branch got contracts before Bryant did. That's because he wasn't their first option. but really what are we still talking about this subject I'm not saying they were bad pic ups I' ve allways have said that you over paid but that's nothing new with your franchise and that Randall-el will not be a #2 receiver I see more potential in Lloyd on becoming the #2 than Randall, he's just a gimmic distraction type of wr. This 2 guys will give teams missmatches and has made your offense more explosive.

Sportsline Power Rankings

Locker Room Main Forum