Fantasy Top 100

[Redskins8588]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Absolutely valid. Their Oline does suck, but so does Indy's, and that turned out pretty well.

I dont understand why you think that Indy's o-line sucks? They only gave up 17 sacks, and Edge did gain 1500 yards running behind them.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

I dont understand why you think that Indy's o-line sucks? They only gave up 17 sacks, and Edge did gain 1500 yards running behind them.

Maybe because their QB is the best in this business and Edge aint bad himself.

[Redskins8588]

Originally Posted by ArtMonkDrillz

Also, this sounds kind of dumb after the way last year ended, but does anyone else think that #2 overall seems a bit high for Larry Johnson? KC lost their OC (thank God, HTTR), and their stud fullback. Granted, Johnson has proved he is a machine and definatly worth a top ten pick, but I would have reservations taking him with the second overall pick.

No, I dont think that LJ at #2 overall is a bit high or over rated for that matter. I understand that he lost his OC and Fullback, but the guy is good and the most important IMO is that he will still be running behind that same o-line. To me the o-line is just as important when you start looking at RB's for fantasy football. I mean, Bush is a talented RB, but do you honestly think that he is gonna run for like 1500 yards and 10 tds behind that piss poor Saints o-line? I dont. Also look at a back like Willie Parker for the Steelers, IMO he would not be as good on a team that had an average o-line. And I really dont think that KC will totally revamp there O in one season... But that is what makes fantasy so fun everyone has an opinion and you watch the season to see how close you were...

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

No, I dont think that LJ at #2 overall is a bit high or over rated for that matter. I understand that he lost his OC and Fullback, but the guy is good and the most important IMO is that he will still be running behind that same o-line. To me the o-line is just as important when you start looking at RB's for fantasy football. I mean, Bush is a talented RB, but do you honestly think that he is gonna run for like 1500 yards and 10 tds behind that piss poor Saints o-line? I dont. Also look at a back like Willie Parker for the Steelers, IMO he would not be as good on a team that had an average o-line. And I really dont think that KC will totally revamp there O in one season... But that is what makes fantasy so fun everyone has an opinion and you watch the season to see how close you were...

I agree, KC's line is still solid and Johnson probably will have a great year once again. However, if I have the 2nd overall pick in our draft and Tomlinson is still on the board, even with Rivers as the new QB, I couldn't justify taking Larry Johnson over him. It's entirely possible that Johnson continues what he started last season and smashes every rushing record ever set and I look like an idiot, but I almost feel okay with taking that risk based on LT's stellar past.

[That Guy]

i think frank gore is probably way too high and isaac bruce shouldn't be excluded from a top 100 fantasy draft... randy moss could have a real bounce back year if brooks is the QB as well.

at the top its larry johnson, LT, shaun, peyton, portis.

your site is dead right now, but its cool you came back, most people just drop an ad and are gone.... and i appreciate that you didn't stealth it like a paid forum plant ("hey guys, i just found this cool new site, i dunno, what do you think???").

[BBFF]

That Guy,

Thanks for the comments. The site is getting updated right now and will be down for awhile. Gore had loads of talent and if the 49ers use him as their premier back he will have nice value. Barlow isn't very good, and his carries should be cut in 2006. As for Bruce, he garnered Top 100 rankings by some of the writers, but not enough to get him on the Consensus. I know I had him in my Top 100.

I am not some spamming Ad machine, I like to talk football, advertise what I do as a hobby and hope to get some regular viewers to the site based on it. We get hundreds of visitors a day, even more when it's Fantasy time.

-Bruno Boys Fantasy Football
www.bbfantasyfootball.com

[BBFF]

TMC,

No harm done. Just was stating my reasoning for why Cooley was left off the list. Hope you enjoy visiting the site and make it a habit during Fantasy Football season.

Bruno Boys Fantasy Football
www.bbfantasyfootball.com

[724Skinsfan]

BBFF, are these rankings based off of a particular point system?

[BBFF]

724 Skins,

Four of our writers did what they feel are there top 100 rankings as of May,2006. Then we took each draft position and divided it by 4 to come up with the Average rankings for each player based on the writers Top 100's.

For example, Larry Johnson was ranked 1,1,2,3 by the 4 writers for a total score of 7. 7 divided by 4 equals 1.75. So the Average ranking position for Larry Johnson was 1.75, which placed him in a tie with Shaun Alexander.

Hope this helps clarify the rankings for you.

-Bruno Boys Fantasy Football
www.bbfantasyfootball.com

[724Skinsfan]

Sort of. The way I see it, a player's ranking reflects the value he will bring to a team. If you participate in a league where scoring is heavily dependent on yards and not receptions then a receivers value drops considerably. Also, most QB's do very well in leagues that award 6 points for passing TD's instead of 4 points so their value becomes diluted. In fact, in those leagues I usaully draft a QB after the fifth round.

I was just curious if the rankings reflect a cetain scoring system. To me LT and Alexander are equal unless receptions are given extra points. Since LT gets more receptions his value goes up in my opinion. I, also, use the "3 three year rule", Instead of going by a players stats from last year I see what he averages over the past three and then add to my decision making other factors like scheduling, injuries, news & notes that might affect their playing time.

As you can see, I like to talk about fantasy football as well. Welcome!

[dmek25]

tmc,dont get schneed going again by bringing up a idol

[BBFF]

724 Skins,

The scoring system we use for all of our rankings is 4 pts for TD passes, 6 pts. for TD rushes and catches, 1 point per every 10 yards receiving and rushing. Also, 1 point per every 25 yards passing.

[hooskins]

Are Big Ben's numbers really going to be high enough to not include Brunell on the list??? There is no way that Pitt is going to pass more than we are next year, they like to keep the pass attempts low, and not long completions. They like to run in the redzone as well. I bet my bottom dollar that Brunell's numbers, fantasywise, will be much superior to that of Big Ben's (injury pending).

[BBFF]

724 Skins,

The scoring system we use for all of our rankings is:
4 pts for TD passes
6 pts. for TD rushes and catches
1 point per every 10 yards receiving and rushing
1 point per every 25 yards passing

With LJ, LT and Alexander you can't go wrong with who you take at the top. All 3 players are going to be very close on overall points scored in 2006.

Glad you like to talk Fantasy Football, its a great conversation starter for sports fanatics like ourselves.

-Bruno Boys Fantasy Football
www.bbfantasyfootball.com

[724Skinsfan]

Originally Posted by BBFF

its a great conversation starter for sports fanatics like ourselves.-

It can also be a great conversation stopper between sports fanatics!