|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
07-13-2006, 11:49 PM
|
#1 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 45
Posts: 1,087
|
Re: Redskins over/under
Quote:
I was trying to be fair but fine, 22 players are going to Hawaii. I think there should be 2 leagues NFL, and a league made up of 32 teams all named Redskins- but be categorized by tribe. That be tight. And the trophy would be The Gibbs.
__________________
Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank"and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts |
|
|
|
|
07-13-2006, 03:44 PM
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 46
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Redskins over/under
we will have a hard time fitting it into the schedule since we will be celebrating ring #4, but i think we could do it!
|
|
|
|
|
07-13-2006, 03:46 PM
|
#3 | |||||||
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins over/under
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
07-13-2006, 03:48 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 46
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Redskins over/under
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-13-2006, 08:39 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins over/under
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-13-2006, 03:51 PM
|
#6 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Potomac, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 304
|
Re: Redskins over/under
But wow...i cannot wait to see Carter in the trenches with Daniels...i really just want them to break baby Manning in half!!!...hell...go for them both.....and just finish out the Hat trick with McNabb....thats all i ask...besides #4....
__________________
DaveyFoSho
|
|
|
|
|
07-13-2006, 08:51 PM
|
#7 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mt. Laurel, NJ
Age: 37
Posts: 353
|
Re: Redskins over/under
over on portis. if he can run for 1500 in gibbs "old" system how much better is he going to do with an o-line that now has another season to gel and the same system that larry johnson just ran for 1700 in by starting only 9 games
__________________
Hail Redskins!!! |
|
|
|
|
07-13-2006, 09:16 PM
|
#8 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Redskins over/under
Wins: 10?
I'll go with over, saying 11. Its a very tough division, we ussually are good for one 2-3 game slide somewhere, although hopefully we can rebound like last year. I like how our schedule plays out...and honestly...I just think we're a very good football team. I think 11, but could see us winning more, or winning 10. Brunell: 3000 yards 20 TDs 10 INTs I'll go under on yards, and TDs, because we like to use the screen with Sellers so much on the goal-line rather than punch the ball in. But if we didnt use those screens, i'd probaboly go with under. I'll say under with INT's just because he is very very safe (which is a reason I said under on yards). Portis: 1400 yards 10 TDs Over on both, Portis is going to be the man this season. Moss: 75 catches 1200 yards 8 TDs I'll go under on all three, the ball will get spread around too much, he is a marked man now. I think with the addition of Lloyd, El and Patten hopefully being back, that Moss's numbers will go down, but his production will still be there. Cooley: 65 catches 650 yards 7 TDs I'll go under on catches, again because he's not our "#2" like he basically was last year, under on yards, over on TDS because we use him so much short. Carter: 10 sacks I'll go under, way under, i'd say about 6-7 (which is still a very solid year). I really think Carters biggest job here is to attract more blockers to open things up for M. Washington. Taylor: 5 INTs He's becoming much better in coverage and such a feared guy...I honestly dont know if he'll have the chance for 5 picks. I'll say 3, Under.
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
