Patten on NFL radio:

[offiss]

[gtripp]To say that Mark Brunell won't and can't take the hit anymore is downright wrong. If you said that to him, he'd punch you. If you said that to his wife, she'd slap you. And you'd deserve it.

Perhaps he should start with the Jag organization and then work his way through the rest of the GM's around the league before he and his wife who is also apparently his tag team partner make thier way over to me.

Tell me Gtripp, are you still getting slapped around yourself, because you sound like your about 8 years old?

[MTK]

So when does camp start??!!

[Battlecatt]

I love the post, but I disagree with the 1987 Skins (88 SB). If you look at the year, Doug Williams was the best QB on the Team. Joe Gibbs was the first to notice that Jay S., had lost his touch. In fact Jay never, ever did anything close to his 2nd year passing yd stats wise with us. His TD to INT ratio is terrible. The odds that year in Vegas for us winning the SB was lower with Doug than Jay. Williams was brought to the team to be the backup, but we all knew he was better than Jay. Williams could flat out throw the ball to either the 2nd or 3rd option without a hitch.

[That Guy]

bleh, i must have mis-remembered FO, lemme go check it out...

[That Guy]

nope, check out table 2, ramsey is listed under "the worst" category
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/200...analysis/3978/

it says he's 0 for 11

they define a comeback as:
"Any instance in which a team had possession of the ball at some point in the fourth quarter and was trailing by eight points or less was considered for the study. This naturally would include any successful comeback regardless of the largest deficit faced – one can’t complete a twenty-point comeback without getting the score under 9 points at some time."

[steveo395]

Originally Posted by That Guy

nope, check out table 2, ramsey is listed under "the worst" category
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/200...analysis/3978/

it says he's 0 for 11

they define a comeback as:
"Any instance in which a team had possession of the ball at some point in the fourth quarter and was trailing by eight points or less was considered for the study. This naturally would include any successful comeback regardless of the largest deficit faced – one can’t complete a twenty-point comeback without getting the score under 9 points at some time."

i thought i remembered him making a couple 4th quarter comebacks at the beginning of 2003

I wish you hadn't showed me that though because Mark Brunell is dead last

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by steveo395

i thought i remembered him making a couple 4th quarter comebacks at the beginning of 2003

I wish you hadn't showed me that though because Mark Brunell is dead last

14/53 = 26.4%... 40% is considered good, only a few QBs are over 50% that are still playing (ben roth, tom brady... elway, young, montana etc had good comeback records too of course).

26.4% is about 26.4% more than 0% though. but we already knew brunell was a manager here and not a gunslinger. otherwisse he wouldn't be chucking balls out of bounds when nothing's open.

[dmek25]

offiss, let us know how you really feel