Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-2006, 09:41 PM   #1
hands11
Camp Scrub
 
hands11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigD View Post
first I just want to say that this is not to compare Taylor to Williams.

With that said, I think those two players are over-rated. The media and fans have gotten into their heads and made them think HARDEST HIT = WIN.

I see that both players get burnned, and when you are somone of Taylor's and Williams talent it shouldn't happen to you that badly.

I mean the game against the Jaguars Taylor put a vicious hit on the receiver but the guy still held on to the ball for a TD. In the game against the Eagles Williams gave up two huge plays because he is looking for the big hit.

My question then, are they really over-rated or are they playing the wrong positions?
I've been a supporter of moving Taylor to SS in which case getting Adam was a bad move. To me, Taylor is almost a LB and like Chicago converting Erlacker (sp), we should at a min. move Taylor to SS where he can lay the wood. Take Vincent if he has the speed, or Rogers if Knight starts or Knight is Rogers starts, and move them to FS.

CB - Spring
CB - Roger/Knight
SS - Taylor
FS - Knight/Rogers

Then you have Ruff, and Vincent for dime and nickel packages.

DE-Wynn - Carter on 3rd or rushing downs
DT-Grif
DT-Salava
DE-Daniels

LB - Marcus
LB - Marshall
LB - McIntosh/Campbell

You could even line up Taylor as an LB and bring in Adam on all out blitz packages. Offenses would be freaked seeing that line up.

This defensive line up feels a lot better to me then what we have seen.
hands11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 09:44 PM   #2
Big C
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 4,453
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hands11 View Post
I've been a supporter of moving Taylor to SS in which case getting Adam was a bad move. To me, Taylor is almost a LB and like Chicago converting Erlacker (sp), we should at a min. move Taylor to SS where he can lay the wood. Take Vincent if he has the speed, or Rogers if Knight starts or Knight is Rogers starts, and move them to FS.

CB - Spring
CB - Roger/Knight
SS - Taylor
FS - Knight/Rogers

Then you have Ruff, and Vincent for dime and nickel packages.

DE-Wynn - Carter on 3rd or rushing downs
DT-Grif
DT-Salava
DE-Daniels

LB - Marcus
LB - Marshall
LB - McIntosh/Campbell

You could even line up Taylor as an LB and bring in Adam on all out blitz packages. Offenses would be freaked seeing that line up.

This defensive line up feels a lot better to me then what we have seen.

knight? do you mean wright? rogers wont be playing safety i dont think
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 09:52 PM   #3
hands11
Camp Scrub
 
hands11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
knight? do you mean wright? rogers wont be playing safety i dont think
your right. I meant wright not knight.
hands11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 08:34 AM   #4
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,264
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Well put.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 09:58 AM   #5
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Vick has looked great the last few days, but I want to see this consistantly from him before I buy in that his arm is better. I was a huge Vick fan when he went to tech, and really hoped he'd transition to the pros. If I want to see exciting, I put Vick in a class with Barry Sanders, but if I'm choosing a QB for my team, I'm picking passing over scrambles. Someone with enough to keep the play alive, but with an arm!
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 07:20 PM   #6
hands11
Camp Scrub
 
hands11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal View Post
Vick has looked great the last few days, but I want to see this consistantly from him before I buy in that his arm is better. I was a huge Vick fan when he went to tech, and really hoped he'd transition to the pros. If I want to see exciting, I put Vick in a class with Barry Sanders, but if I'm choosing a QB for my team, I'm picking passing over scrambles. Someone with enough to keep the play alive, but with an arm!

Vick did play amazing this last week. So has he been overrated. Probably true do date. I think people got pumped on his running and his potential.

I kind of see it like this. A QB that can run like Vick can take more time to gain other QB skills because they can always run. Randal Cunningham was like this. But as they get more years under their belts and they learn to be better D readers and passers, they become amazing QBs.

One important question is, how much leg do they have left before they learn the other QB game so they can have the best of both.

If Vick is actually learning that now, he could be a QB at the level of a McNabb or even much better. I think he will get there soon. ( This year or next )
hands11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 10:26 AM   #7
The Zimmermans
Impact Rookie
 
The Zimmermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 41
Posts: 937
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Vick always has spurs of brilliance like this, and then he runs into a defensive scheme he can't handle, and suddenly he spirals downward. He's very fun to watch, but if the atlanta D wasnt so solid every year, they would never make the playoffs.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure
The Zimmermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 10:33 AM   #8
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

vick is the most over rated quarterback in the league. with that being said, he is one of the top 3 athletes playing in this league. and so far, for the falcons at least, that has translated into winning. he does not fit the traditional mold of an nfl qback, but whatever works, so be it. but to say he is on par with manning or mcnabb, that is just plain stupid. and im pretty sure everything i have said here has nothing to do with what color his skin is.
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 10:41 AM   #9
hail_2_da_skins
Impact Rookie
 
hail_2_da_skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

This post in insane. It went from, "Is Sean Taylor and Roy Williams over-rated?" to "Michael Vick and Donovan McNabb are over-rated?" to "whoever thinks Vick and McNabb are over-rated is racist". This is by far the most bizarre post ever. Both Sean Taylor and Roy Williams deserve the reputation they have gained. You can never discount the intimidation factor. What each player lacks in coverage skills is more than made up with the intimidation factor. Fear will cause wide receivers run bad routes, drop passes and short-arm catches. As for Vick and McNabb being over-rated, that's another absurb comment. Look at the results and the standings. Would you rather have Mark Brunell to quarterback your team or Vick or McNabb. I'll take Vick or McNabb in a heartbeat.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS"
hail_2_da_skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 10:46 AM   #10
The Zimmermans
Impact Rookie
 
The Zimmermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 41
Posts: 937
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

brunell sucks, so comparing anyone to him is meaningless. no one thinks mcnabb is overrated, just vick.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure
The Zimmermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.97871 seconds with 11 queries