![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
|
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
Quote:
CB - Spring CB - Roger/Knight SS - Taylor FS - Knight/Rogers Then you have Ruff, and Vincent for dime and nickel packages. DE-Wynn - Carter on 3rd or rushing downs DT-Grif DT-Salava DE-Daniels LB - Marcus LB - Marshall LB - McIntosh/Campbell You could even line up Taylor as an LB and bring in Adam on all out blitz packages. Offenses would be freaked seeing that line up. This defensive line up feels a lot better to me then what we have seen. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 4,453
|
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
Quote:
knight? do you mean wright? rogers wont be playing safety i dont think
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
|
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
Well put.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
Vick has looked great the last few days, but I want to see this consistantly from him before I buy in that his arm is better. I was a huge Vick fan when he went to tech, and really hoped he'd transition to the pros. If I want to see exciting, I put Vick in a class with Barry Sanders, but if I'm choosing a QB for my team, I'm picking passing over scrambles. Someone with enough to keep the play alive, but with an arm!
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
|
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
Quote:
Vick did play amazing this last week. So has he been overrated. Probably true do date. I think people got pumped on his running and his potential. I kind of see it like this. A QB that can run like Vick can take more time to gain other QB skills because they can always run. Randal Cunningham was like this. But as they get more years under their belts and they learn to be better D readers and passers, they become amazing QBs. One important question is, how much leg do they have left before they learn the other QB game so they can have the best of both. If Vick is actually learning that now, he could be a QB at the level of a McNabb or even much better. I think he will get there soon. ( This year or next ) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 41
Posts: 937
|
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
Vick always has spurs of brilliance like this, and then he runs into a defensive scheme he can't handle, and suddenly he spirals downward. He's very fun to watch, but if the atlanta D wasnt so solid every year, they would never make the playoffs.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
vick is the most over rated quarterback in the league. with that being said, he is one of the top 3 athletes playing in this league. and so far, for the falcons at least, that has translated into winning. he does not fit the traditional mold of an nfl qback, but whatever works, so be it. but to say he is on par with manning or mcnabb, that is just plain stupid. and im pretty sure everything i have said here has nothing to do with what color his skin is.
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
|
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
This post in insane. It went from, "Is Sean Taylor and Roy Williams over-rated?" to "Michael Vick and Donovan McNabb are over-rated?" to "whoever thinks Vick and McNabb are over-rated is racist". This is by far the most bizarre post ever. Both Sean Taylor and Roy Williams deserve the reputation they have gained. You can never discount the intimidation factor. What each player lacks in coverage skills is more than made up with the intimidation factor. Fear will cause wide receivers run bad routes, drop passes and short-arm catches. As for Vick and McNabb being over-rated, that's another absurb comment. Look at the results and the standings. Would you rather have Mark Brunell to quarterback your team or Vick or McNabb. I'll take Vick or McNabb in a heartbeat.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 41
Posts: 937
|
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
brunell sucks, so comparing anyone to him is meaningless. no one thinks mcnabb is overrated, just vick.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|