Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-22-2006, 11:08 PM   #1
Darrell_Green_28
The Starter
 
Darrell_Green_28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Robert, Louisiana
Age: 57
Posts: 2,119
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
This is where Gibbs the Team President needs to exercise a veto over Gibbs the Head Coach.

Coach Gibbs wouldn't want to bench Brunell because of the message it sends to the team. But somebody in the organization needs to be thinking long term, and it should be the team president. If Gibbs doesn't make the switch, he'll be doing the team a huge disservice in the long run.
Just curious, isnt Gibbs the Redskins Team President also??
Darrell_Green_28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 09:33 PM   #2
joekes
Camp Scrub
 
joekes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

Fire Al Saunders!!
He thinks he's too much of a F*cking genius- To much of a genius to run the plays during preseason, too much of a genius to run his backs more than 22 times against the WORST running defense in the league. RUN THE BALL GENIUS. Maybe he can go coach MENSA's football team.
His offense sucks for this team.
His offense is for teams that like to look pretty and lose in the first round of th playoffs - teams with vaginas. Maybe he can go coach MENSA's powder puff football team.
Fire Al Saunders NOW!!
(if you don't want to fire him, fine, just unplug his mic).
joekes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 09:41 PM   #3
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by joekes View Post
Fire Al Saunders!!
He thinks he's too much of a F*cking genius- To much of a genius to run the plays during preseason, too much of a genius to run his backs more than 22 times against the WORST running defense in the league. RUN THE BALL GENIUS. Maybe he can go coach MENSA's football team.
His offense sucks for this team.
His offense is for teams that like to look pretty and lose in the first round of th playoffs - teams with vaginas. Maybe he can go coach MENSA's powder puff football team.
Fire Al Saunders NOW!!
(if you don't want to fire him, fine, just unplug his mic).
The first 7 runs netted 1 yard rushing. It's not like they didn't try. Once the third quarter started, the Colts were up 27-14 before anyone could blink, and Portis was getting banged up.

Firing Al Saunders would help the team out as much as moving its headquarters from Ashburn to Tyson's Corner.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 09:49 PM   #4
joekes
Camp Scrub
 
joekes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
The first 7 runs netted 1 yard rushing. It's not like they didn't try. Once the third quarter started, the Colts were up 27-14 before anyone could blink, and Portis was getting banged up.
Great running teams keep pounding it. Only then can you be consistent. You have to keep running. Saunders is too much of a girl to keep running it.
How did the team start winning last year?
Running (even with Brunnell) Running!!

Saunders system also destroys our own defense. Teams with a Saunders offenses have always had terrible defenses because he never controls the time of posession. Ball control- that's how you win championships.
We don't need his double reverses on 3rd and 1. Just pound the F*cking ball! Ask the O-line what they want. Unless you're going to get a whole new O-line, you need to get rid of this Saunders crap.
Ladell is a really good back too, averaging more per carry than Portis-
You have 5 backs - surely one of them can pound some yards out. It's a problem of determination from the booth.
joekes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 11:03 PM   #5
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
The first 7 runs netted 1 yard rushing. It's not like they didn't try. Once the third quarter started, the Colts were up 27-14 before anyone could blink, and Portis was getting banged up.

Firing Al Saunders would help the team out as much as moving its headquarters from Ashburn to Tyson's Corner.
Thank you, sanity, I am seriously glad people that are crying for Saunder's head, are not running our team.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 11:13 PM   #6
Darrell_Green_28
The Starter
 
Darrell_Green_28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Robert, Louisiana
Age: 57
Posts: 2,119
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

yes i was right Coach Gibbs is also team president. so Coach Gibbs should veto saunders

Washington Redskins
Darrell_Green_28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 11:28 PM   #7
NYCSkin
Impact Rookie
 
NYCSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 54
Posts: 513
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

I have a change that I haven't heard advocated so much...How about Collins for Brunell now?

Give Collins--who knows the offense better than Brunell and Campbell--two weeks to get some timing down with the receivers. He's younger, less beat up, and Saunders trusts him more. Start him at Dallas and see how he does. However, should the team get to 7 losses--start Campbell...
NYCSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 05:04 AM   #8
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCSkin View Post
I have a change that I haven't heard advocated so much...How about Collins for Brunell now?

Give Collins--who knows the offense better than Brunell and Campbell--two weeks to get some timing down with the receivers. He's younger, less beat up, and Saunders trusts him more. Start him at Dallas and see how he does. However, should the team get to 7 losses--start Campbell...
why? we already know collins isn't an NFL starter (and he's OLD), so we should see if the young guy is.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 11:29 PM   #9
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

I also think it's time to start Campbell considering playoff talk at this point is nothing more than a joke. However...starting Campbell doesn't fix our swiss cheese defense either. Wow...this season was over in record time as well...speechless!!!
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 05:03 AM   #10
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

the truth is we don't have the personnel to make wide sweeping changes. arch was a huge mistake, carter was a big mistake, lloyd may or may not have been a mistake (can't tell when the QB is the bottleneck on offense).

start wynn, start vincent, start rocky, start campbell. those rookie DTs are good for depth only right now, everyone and their brother can run on them.

missing griffin and lemar REALLY hurt our defense, and carlos coul have helped. khary campbell is not an NFL linebacker, and he's not really a good backup either. holdman, carter, and archuleta are invisible... we needd 11 guys playing defense, not 8. wynn is very average, but i'll take that over "look, i have one-move" carter any day (carter did have 1 nice shed and tackle for loss today, btu that's not enough).
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 09:04 AM   #11
DirtBagZ
Special Teams
 
DirtBagZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 481
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

At 2-5, it is time for the whole organization to realize that it is time to rebuild. There are no quick fixes as far as the defence goes. I am not big Warrick Holdman fan, benching him for Rocky, is not going to turn around the 'D'. This team has too many holes to fill, I cannot recall what post, or thread, but someone mentioned that the lines need to be rebuilt, and I agree, with that sentiment whole-heartedly. As much as I hate to admit it the Cowboys and Giants have gotten it right, Dallas rebuilt there defensive front seven through the draft, and the Giants have built their O-line through the draft. It goes without saying that the Eagles have it right, in that their team is soundly built through the draft.

It is hard to say just what exactly is the problem with the Redskins, this season's inconsitent play and the penalties are particularly frustraing as fan, since this is not the type of play, one would expect from a team of Joe Gibb's 'Redskins' and character guys. I think Thomas Boswell, of the Washington Post, was on to something with his column this morning, when he questioned the heart of the team. Boswell mentioned,

"Some of us remember Gibb's old teams up close, and how they carried themselves in the tunnel before a game, responded to the challenges to start the second half and even how furious their faces looked in a losing locker room. Any resemblance between these Redskins and those Redskins is purely coincidental."

Time and again we see threads about how 'talented' the Redskins are, and how can such a 'talented' team have this type of record. These various threads over the years about how 'talented' the Redskins are yet their performance has not been the same, is the defining mark of the SnyderSkins. Because like Boswell, I remember those teams, I grew up watching those teams and I suspect that is why I still like this team and root for it. It is difficult to watch the team not do well with Gibbs as the coach, having witnessed those glorious teams that won three Super Bowls.
DirtBagZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 09:58 AM   #12
Hog1
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

On the postive side of things, Skins fans have a short memory (both for good and bad events). The sins of the past will be forgiven when progress (real or imagined) is seen. That having been said, as already stated, 2007 season starts today. All the usual changes beginning with JC are implemented. Use the remaining season to evaluate the +'s, and -'s of the 2006 offseason, and what options are available. Evaluate the players and coaches, age, effectiveness, contracts, etc., and who needs to go or stay and what can be done about it. What works and what doesn't. Now the hard part................make it happen!
ONLY 10 MONTHS TO PRE-SEASON!
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs
Hog1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 01:25 PM   #13
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
With 5 losses I think it's safe to say the playoffs are out of the picture barring an epic turnaround.

Not that I think it's going to make a dramatic difference this year, but I think it's time to start Campbell and start building towards next year. We need to get an idea if this kid can play. Let him take his lumps and get some game experience.

Get some of the youngers guys in there too like McIntosh.


I agree, and the whole idea is not whether he'll make a drastic difference, but whether this guy can actually play at this level. The sooner we find out the better. He may not be the answer at all, we may still have to look elsewhere for the solution, but we can use these nine games to guage where we're at with Jason. Gibbs continues to say Brunell gives us the best chance to win, but the question remains, to win what? None of us have seen Jason play with the first team unit, and until I do, I'm going to put all my opinions on hold.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 02:08 PM   #14
Jamaican'Skin
The Starter
 
Jamaican'Skin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Age: 38
Posts: 2,418
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

DirtBagZ went into this but I want to look at it further. The heart that this team seems to be putting into each side of the ball is ridiculous. I see guys out there just going thru the motions. No matter how bad Brunnel maybe, if guys were putting more into it, we would have a winning record.

I don't know what's gone wrong with the nasty D from last year, and I don't know why the O just can't get some core plays and work together, but I think it has to deal with the heart and motivation of this team.

My solution? Well, for the rest of this year, no one is automatically granted a starting position. You work hard in practise and you get a spot. You don't, you won't. That should show the coaches who wants to be here, who out of the new group signed are core guys, and it will humble a lot of the players who are overpaid.

Apart from heart, I really think this team thought that everything would be handed to them after last year. They probably thought that they deserved to reach the playoffs this year, and that has also affected them.

Just my 2 cents
Jamaican'Skin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 02:46 PM   #15
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: 2-5 at the bye: time to make changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamaican'Skin View Post
My solution? Well, for the rest of this year, no one is automatically granted a starting position. You work hard in practise and you get a spot. You don't, you won't. That should show the coaches who wants to be here, who out of the new group signed are core guys, and it will humble a lot of the players who are overpaid.
remember lavar? that's kinda how most teams work, but the talent divide between starters and backups is generally so great, that you just can't start whatever crappy player is working harder in practice.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.51089 seconds with 11 queries