![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 41
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
AA proved his worth early on: pretty useless. I have no question he doesn't belong on this team, but once again we have a disgruntled player leaving the organization pissed off.
What the hell is with the management of this team that we seem to have more pissed players up and leave or get fired than any other team I'm aware of? Is it just because I follow the Redskins a lot closer than other teams, or does this team genuinely screw people over season after season? I'm not arguing that AA should play or that he's good, I'm just wondering in general why these situations happen so freakin' often to this team.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
Quote:
But the bigger question is, why does this seem to be a consistent theme with our staff/management? Why is it that the coaches play the silence game with the media, toe the company line, and all of sudden we have another disgruntled player that is leaving the team. No way in hell it's always the player that's the problem. Why do I get the impression that Gibbs has no control over this team?? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 41
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
Quote:
One, two, maybe three disgruntled players and I'd say it's a string of bad luck. This is getting to be a yearly occurrence, however. Every season it's one or two guys who get pissed off and leaving hating the team, season in and season out. I'm not saying we should be out to make friends - yes, business is business and it can be rough. At a certain point you've got to start wondering if maybe it's not just a string of bad luck or some selfish players...
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
Does this article pretty much mean that Archuletta was indeed the mole and not Springs like many had thought?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The ATX (formerly Balmer)
Posts: 1,125
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
Unless it was just a smokescreen, weren't there a number of references to how things had been run in the past, which would indicate it wasn't someone new like Arch?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alexandria,VA
Age: 47
Posts: 150
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
Id just tell that "fag" to stop plucking his eyebrows for real!
__________________
Hail! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Age: 40
Posts: 896
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
still a load of crap. Did he really need Williams and Gibbs to sit down and hold his hand. They're the Redskins not the Archulettas...he's not special, you play like crap, you sit on the bench...I think it was pretty clear to everyone why he wasn't playing and when is Gibbs ever going to say "he sucks...he isn't playing well, blah blah blah." He's not going to do that ever, he tries to pump people up, so Arch needs to shut up...pack up his depends, and get out of town
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arrington, Va.
Posts: 99
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
I don't have any idea whether Archuleta has been lied to or not because I don't know what has/hasn't been said to him behind closed doors.
What I do know is that it was the Redskins, not Archuleta, who made him the highest paid safety in the history of football. In order for them to have done that, you've got to believe they gathered 'round a table and said "Look, whatever it takes to get this guy we've got to pony it up because we just can't risk letting him get away, he's going to be our difference maker- he's that good." And then- oops- he wasn't. What's really new here? The Redskins have been paying top dollar for mediocre players on the open market for years now. No shock there. Now, they've got a pissed off player accusing the organization of lying to/misleading him. That's becoming a disturbingly common occurance as well. It's time to stop shooting the messenger. Archuleta might have had a horrible season, but if he was drawing a journeyman's salary this wouldn't be a front page story and we'd all be shrugging it off as "we need another saftey." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
During the process of negotiation with Archuleta and his agent, the team made clear the role they expected him to play. There was uncertaintity surrounding the status of Sean Taylor at the time, and they had made up their mind if Ryan Clark wanted more than they were willing to pay, they would let him walk because they wanted to up grade the position, and felt Archuleta would be a physical upgrade to Clark.
In reality ,there wasn't much in terms of negotiation, the Redskins made him an offer he couldn't refuse. They were well aware of his limited coverage skills, but they led him to believe he and Marcus Washington were going to be used in blitz packages, and that's what they were expecting from him. It was clear in September that Archuleta was not going to be the starter oposite Taylor. Pierson Prioleau was to be the starter, but when he got hurt on the opening kickoff, and Shawn Springs got injured, they could not play Archuleta the way they had intended to play him. When he speaks about being lied too, this is obviously what he is refering too. They contracted him to blitz, injuries foiled the plan, they had to use him, but in ways they were well aware he was not best suited. When we all witnessed he could not cover, he was left holding the bag with basically no place for him in the defense You really can't blame Archuleta for an experiment gone bad, the team should have taken more into consideration his limitations, and not been so willing to make such a huge financial commitment to a player that limited.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
Not a bad question.
Here's my glass half full theory.... The Redskins are one of the few teams that don't cater to whiney crybabies. They would rather them leave disgruntled and unhappy instead of elevate those few to the lofty pedestal in which they foolishly believe they entitled to. just a theory...
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
I totally understand where you are coming from AA. I too hate being lied to. They told us you were a hard hitter, smart, and all around good player. The truth is, you suck. Any moron can play close to the line and play the run. That's basic prerequisite to being a safety. What everyone expected was a Strong Safety. That means someone who can lay the smack down as well as cover the TE. Which in tern means someone who doesn't bite harder than a BDSM mistress on a pump fake and who can keep up with a TE in the 4th qt when your team is leading.
Know that I know that it's not your fault. It's the talent evaluator at Redskins Park's fault.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
Quote:
Saden - the talent evaluator you are referring to - what that be Cerrato or Gibbs or both? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
Quote:
I choose all of the above including the security guard at the parking lot and the lady that washes player's towels.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 56
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: ESPN: Archuleta: 'I don't like getting lied to'
It is funny how every guy on this board said about the same thing before the season started... "We overpayed for AA, but there is no question he is an upgrade over Ryan Clark". Hind sight is 20/20. I agree he is bad in coverage, but I don't understand why people bust on his tackling. He is and has always been a good tackler, led the team before being benched (AA didn't miss that tackle against Jackson last week , but Taylor gets a by?)
I still think that AA was brought in to be a hitter if Taylor went to jail, but the coaches expected that they could magically teach him to become a better pass defender if Taylor avoided jail. They couldn't... and here we are. He was talked into joining the skins, then used wrong, then benched. I am amazed that he has been as silent as he has been throughout this whole thing. Wouldn't anyone else here be pissed? (Personally I could temper my frustration with the 10 million ![]()
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|