![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
However, James Thrash is the second best wide receiver on this team, so in three receiver sets, he's got to be on the field. It seems to me that whenever Lloyd is on the field, that we are allocating our resources poorly, or at least less than perfect. Here's the offensive skill position players that should get more PT than Lloyd: Moss Cooley Portis Betts Randle El Sellers Thrash That's seven players who have value to this team. Assuming good health, which three players are going to be taken off the field to stick an underachiever on? Do y'all really want Mike Sellers to play less so that Lloyd can play? Heck, if Tyler Ecker comes back healthy, at least he can block. Until some injuries start to pile up, it makes sense to keep Lloyd inactive so that we don't cost hardworking players playing time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
Anyhow, my point is that I think the receivers will do better this year, but I think that's just as much a product of being more accustomed to the system than anything else.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
Talking receivers, Moss had a bad year and will rebound. Lloyd probably won't play very much. I expect him to look like an NFL receiver when he does. Randle El will get more looks, and consequently more yards. The guy to watch out for is James Thrash. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Have to agree with Matty, he isn' going to move up the depth chart at all, with the exception the other guys get serious injuries. Thrash was was at the top of his game his last year with us the first go around and his first season with the Eagles. IF he hasn't cracked a top 3 spot he never will at this point.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
He should be used more as our posession reciever. He seems to be able to make some great posession catches. We have a need for that in our offense.
If Corey Bradford makes the team he also might be used as such. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 363
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
im sure he wont be a #2 receiver because i know that the Skins wouldnt pay a 4th stringer[Randle El, Brandon Lloyd] a 30 million dollar contract
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 42
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
thrash always looks good in the scrimmages. i love thrash but there is no way, baring injury, that trash is #2
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Trash is considered a great #3 - #4 WR. Because he is very easy to lose out there on the field, especially when on the same field as Moss and Randle El who have big play potential every time they tie up their cleats. Making him a good WR to look at when you need a Catch to move the chains, even more so because he is not afraid to absorb the big hit over the middle.
But no, no way is he a #2 starting caliber Wide Out. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
James Thrash is Ricky Proehl for Al Saunders. Not a starter, but clutch
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
no way. Ricky Proehl could run. thrash has absolutely no speed. he is a good special teamer. no more, no less. if he gets on the field alot this season, it means one of 2 things. the skins are blowing someone out. or they are getting blown out
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Posts: 322
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
He must have lost a lot of speed then. As I've reported before Thrash ran a 4.2 40 in college. He took the mantle of fastest Redskin off of #28's shoulders. In comparison, I found
Coles: 4.29 Moss: 4.31 Champ Bailey: 4.42 That's one of the reasons he's a gunner. Unless his legs are totally trashed I think he is terribly under-used. He almost never makes a bonehead play. But I must be wrong since nobody ever responds to my posts about this. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 39
Posts: 2,583
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
I like Thrash as well. He can be a good option on certain plays and situation but, no more. He cannot be a dependable #2 WR, IMO. Clutch? I guess you could say that. He had a few crucial plays in the last 2 years, a couple in Dallas games. Yet, IMO, I believe his is just still a career situational guy and special teamer.
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
In case you've missed it, with the exception of 2000 where he had 50 catches for 653 yards and only 2 td's for us, he has had a total of 58 catches for 779 yards in a Redskins uni in 6 years...plus a total of only 2 tds during that span! (97-99 and 04-06) Even after he signed that big contract in Phily, he still only produced a career high of 63 catches and 833 yards, and that was 6 years ago!!! Trust me when I say, that if we need Thrash to be our #2, our season is over.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 56
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Could Thrash Become #2 WR
Quote:
But in the clutch Warner could always count on Proehl. Thrash serves the same capacity. Not talking about style of play.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|