![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
Why we would want Leftwich here is beyond me, the guy is horrible!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
When Brunnel is traded, why not get that draft pick back that was used to acquire Kendall?
If Gibbs has no intention of keeping 3 QB's on the roster anyway, the team would make out pretty good getting that pick back. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
Brunell could definitely end up back in Jax...interesting turn of events.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
Leftwich has all the durability of an 8-ounce styrofoam cup.
This doesn't surprise me in the least. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 60
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
Quote:
I agree, and NOT very good to begin with! IMO, we would be MUCH better off keeping Mark as a backup. If somehow a deal/ release happens to MB, I still don't won't Leftwich in DC PERIOD!
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
I guess I am the only one (other than jacksonville) that sees Leftwich for what he is...CRAP!
The man has never threw for over 3000 yards, nor over 15 tds. He was too highly touted out of Marshall and some people here compared him to Marino. I, of course, laughed at that, and I was right. Leftwich was overrated then, and he is likely still a little overrated. He is USELESS people! I'd rather have Palmer than Leftwich, it would not be wise to bring in this guy.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 54
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
Quote:
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
Wow, that's a shocker, espeically at this late stage. I don't think Garrard is any good but what do I know? He reminds me of Seneca Wallace of the Seachickens.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
Leftwich isn't bad at all. I prefer my quarterbacks to be able to play a 16 game season - which Leftwich has never done, but to each his own.
We should get something straight though. No one is going to trade for Leftwich. He carries a $5.1 million base salary, and has practically no options for starting this year. Even if you have the cap space, Leftwich won't want to sign long-term (for fear he's being undervalued) and has no reason to sign a one year deal for lesser monies out of the goodness of his heart. If he's cut - which will definitely happen before opening day rosters are set (lest he be guaranteed his full salary as termination pay under the CBA) - then there are a number of teams where he'd have a better chance at playing than here. Minnesota's been mentioned, but how about Atlanta? Is Seattle a good fit? I know Byron went to high school in the district, but I don't think that's enough impetus (look it up) to be a guaranteed third stringer.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
Leftwich is nothing but a mediocre starting QB in this league. He'll never be more than that. At this stage in his career, he is what he is. There's no upside to having him on the Redskins - we want Campbell to develop into a franchise QB and we don't want a guy like Leftwich steaming because he's backing up a young guy.
Let's all put on our thinking caps here, people. Just because a guy becomes available doesn't mean the Washington Redskins need to acquire him.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 214
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 42
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
i cant believe people want this guy here.
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
I think Leftwich will make a good backup for somebody, but I'm not sure it's in our best interests to have him here in D.C.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 42
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
thats the problem, he doesnt want to be the backup.
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
No new threads for you
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moneytown
Posts: 127
|
Re: Jags done with Leftwich
Leftwich leaving Jacksonville next stop....... ATL
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|