Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Falcons Extreme Makeover

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-15-2008, 03:11 PM   #1
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

Coleman would also be a really good signing, if we could get him at a good price. He wouldn't start for us, but we could actually have a tackle rotation. Go figure.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 03:11 PM   #2
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

I had thought they might cut Dunn as well, guess they didn't.

Coleman and Leftwich are decent possibilities (and I supppose to a smaller extent-Crocker). Overall though nothing that really impresses me.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 07:39 PM   #3
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I had thought they might cut Dunn as well, guess they didn't.

Coleman and Leftwich are decent possibilities (and I supppose to a smaller extent-Crocker). Overall though nothing that really impresses me.
Pat Yasinskas was speculating in an article yesterday that they may be looking to trade Dunn for picks so he still may be on the way out.

I agree with you on the Falcons cuts, nothing impresses.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 03:12 PM   #4
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 40
Posts: 5,813
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

leftwitch could be a back up here i agree wit that, but I'd say vet min... which he wouldnt like im sure
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 03:15 PM   #5
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

I'm suprised they cut Crumpler, they easily could've gotten a mid round draft pick for him had they traded him. Either way w/e they think is best for the team. I'm not really interested in picking up any of them, I like Coleman but I think he's getting up there in age and I'm not down for paying big bucks to someone who's on the wrong side of 30.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 03:21 PM   #6
skinzaholic73
Camp Scrub
 
skinzaholic73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Virginia
Age: 51
Posts: 78
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

no on crumpler but maybe leftwich.He might be useful if he comes cheap..vet min.that's the only way.
skinzaholic73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 03:42 PM   #7
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

Sounds like it's house cleaning time in ATL.

Crumpler is good but he seems to always be battling injuries.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 04:24 PM   #8
CPAlltheWay012
Special Teams
 
CPAlltheWay012's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: B-Town
Posts: 166
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

Crumpler is probably headed to Seattle... that would make the most sense IMO... former coach Jim Mora Jr.. and then you'd be giving Matt Hasselbeck a good TE, something which I believe they lack.

The Skins should look into Rod Coleman though. He's on the older side at 31, however I still think he can be a valuable player in the DT position.
CPAlltheWay012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 05:10 PM   #9
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

Crumpler is a great TE and would be great for the Redskins' situation, but the Redskins wouldn't be a good fit for him. He's just too good to play second fiddle to one of the 7 or so TEs in this league who are better than him.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 05:27 PM   #10
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

No way Crumpler would work out here, too many guys that want the ball. Don't take away any of Cooley's action.

I like Leftwich & he grew up in DC as a Skins fan, but that's the ONLY thing that fits about him coming here. He has a ridiculous wind up & is already a big man, which makes his long wind up longer. The WCO is just not a good fit for him.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 06:55 PM   #11
JGisLordOfTheRings
Playmaker
 
JGisLordOfTheRings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 39
Posts: 2,583
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

All I wanna know is WHY in the HELL you cut Algae? He's like, one of the only 3 bright spots on your offense, much less your whole frickin team. The Falcons I think are taking after Bill Parcells recent doings in Miami and following suit.

But, Crumpler though? Why not trade and try to get a pick or re-sign him or something! ANYTHING! I guarantee you next year all the analysts are gonna rag em for doing it when they've got 13 points through 10 games. Lol@ Falcons...Man, Vick really boned 'em.
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings
JGisLordOfTheRings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 07:03 PM   #12
theJBexperience
Impact Rookie
 
theJBexperience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

Quote:
Originally Posted by JGisLordOfTheRings View Post
All I wanna know is WHY in the HELL you cut Algae? He's like, one of the only 3 bright spots on your offense, much less your whole frickin team. The Falcons I think are taking after Bill Parcells recent doings in Miami and following suit.

But, Crumpler though? Why not trade and try to get a pick or re-sign him or something! ANYTHING! I guarantee you next year all the analysts are gonna rag em for doing it when they've got 13 points through 10 games. Lol@ Falcons...Man, Vick really boned 'em.
Maybe, they tried shopping Algae around and couldn't get anything worthwhile. It doesn't make much sense.
theJBexperience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 07:19 PM   #13
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

Quote:
Originally Posted by JGisLordOfTheRings View Post
All I wanna know is WHY in the HELL you cut Algae?
The party line is that OC Mike Mularky favors blocking TE's over recieving ones so Crumpler would have little use in the offense. However I disagree with the move myself.

As I stated before I don't know how long Mularky is going to be the OC, especially on a team thats going to suck for the next five years. Personally I see him either being fired or taking a better job on a team that has a chance to score a TD or two. In the mean time Mularky is just trying to give himself something to do. So in my opinon, cutting your best offensive player just because the OC for the time being doesn't favor recieving TE's is a mistake. It's times like this where I'm glad I'm not a Falcons fan. Hail!!!
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 07:27 PM   #14
JGisLordOfTheRings
Playmaker
 
JGisLordOfTheRings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 39
Posts: 2,583
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
The party line is that OC Mike Mularky favors blocking TE's over recieving ones so Crumpler would have little use in the offense. However I disagree with the move myself.

As I stated before I don't know how long Mularky is going to be the OC, especially on a team thats going to suck for the next five years. Personally I see him either being fired or taking a better job on a team that has a chance to score a TD or two. In the mean time Mularky is just trying to give himself something to do. So in my opinon, cutting your best offensive player just because the OC for the time being doesn't favor recieving TE's is a mistake. It's times like this where I'm glad I'm not a Falcons fan. Hail!!!
Amen.....
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings
JGisLordOfTheRings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 07:18 PM   #15
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Falcons Extreme Makeover

no thanks to Atlanta's garbage. there was a reason they sucked last year. they had players who couldn't play
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.79298 seconds with 11 queries