![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
I like the sound of that...Its just fools gold that we always buy into..Lets stay strong face forward and leave John where he is.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
No thank you John Lynch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 14
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
I don't think we should pick up Lynch to replace any of our guys, but rather, to mentor them. Our 4 safeties are very young guys, I think being around someone like Lynch would be a great influence.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
Quote:
1. He has a Super Bowl Ring 2. He's been a starter for over 10 years 3. He's financially secure 4. He's considering going into broadcasting, leading me to believe that he's ready to move on to life after football (unlike some people lol). so even if the front office was willing to sign him, I doubt they get bring him in under those circumstances. And on top of that I don't know if he would accept a vet min type contract which I imagine is all we could offer him after the Jason Taylor trade. I know some might want to bring up Troy Vincent but I see John Lynch and Troy Vincent as two very different situations.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 46
Posts: 4,628
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
Quote:
http://www.redskins.com/team/cprofile.jsp?id=57 No need to pick up a twilight safety when the Skins have 2 competent safeties ready to rock and roll.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things... “WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
No thanks. If he were 2-3 years younger, then I'd probably be alright with signing him. It's bad enough when a player if over 30, it's even worse if they are closer to 40 than 30.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
I wonder how many times we are going to have to go through this as the mass of aging veterans start getting released during the pre-season?
Let's try and follow some simple guidelines. 1. If the player is old as dirt don't bother. 2. If the player is washed up don't bother. 3. If the player doesn't address and area of need like LB don't bother. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
Quote:
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,180
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
Quote:
First the guy is not washed up. Second he is a hard hitting Strong Safety. Third he would be a short term fix. Fourth He is a proven veteran (unlike Doughty) and he frees up Landry to make plays in the secondary. I would definitley sign him to a 1-2 year deal |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
Quote:
Adam Archuleta in 2006: 60 tackles (49 solo) 1 sack, 1 pass defended The general consensus (I believe) is that Archuleta was a colossal failure for us (both from a personnnel management decision, and from a performance aspect) and yet what you're basically saying is you want someone who just last year recreated the same year Archuleta suffered through with the Redskins two years ago...and Lynch is six years older than Archuleta.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
Quote:
In all fairness to Lynch, he plays free safety w/the best corner tandem in the league, so his #s should be lower than Arch's, who played ss a lot here & was matched up 1 on 1 w/TE's a lot. I think the main thing is the last you said, he's 6 years older than Arch & is definitely at the end of his career. I could only see him signing in dc if there was a serious rash of safety injuries, kinda like when we got Taylor after Daniels & Buzbee went down. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
I think when we signed Schweigert, for better or worse, we made our bed in regards to the safety position. While the SS spot is maybe not a position of strength for us, I don't see Lynch as constituting an improvement over what we already have.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
Almost forgot to include the Chris Cooley quote on my BOY Reed.
Quote:
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: John Lynch is available, should we make a move?
Definitely not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|