![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Quote:
I kind of think a lot of folks are under the assumption that we can draft one of the top 4 and just slot him at RT and he'll be a stud until moving to LT post Samuels. It's not as simple as it seems.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Quote:
More generally I think players drafted early in the 1st ought to make an immediate impact, w/ the exception of most rookie QBs. If a player drafted that high can't start right away something has gone very wrong IMO, whether it's at the player or coaching level.
__________________
24-34 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DMV
Posts: 72
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Quote:
__________________
Hold on. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Quote:
Find the linebackers later. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
I'd venture that there are more undrafted/late round OL doing well in the league than LB. Most of the stud LB (Ware, Merriman, Urlacher, Lewis, Suggs) are 1st round picks. Yeah there's the occasional Antonio Pierce (thanks Joe and Gregg) but really, that's a position to draft proven talent for.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Yes football is a "team" sport, but every position has a certain value that when you look at it in a vacuum, can be prioritized. Obviously the Redskins have certain specific needs. That all being considered, i feel that investing in your future on the offensive line will far and away out perform an investment in the linebacking corp.
We made our investment in linebacking corp with Rocky and the with HB Blades(who is granted starting to look more like a mike to follow London). Stephon Heyer is not what i would call an appropriate investment in the single most important "unit" on the field. Honestly, I don't know how GM's get away with not spending a 1-3 rd pick every 2-3 years. The state of our depth at offensive line is a crime in a billion $ organization. We are forced to re-act in this draft, just like last year with the wideouts. Dan develops a business model to successfully make money with the Redskins. But he takes a pass on making a football specific plan. I am tired of re-evaluating every offseason, and focusing on that year's problems. Big picture Vinnie! Look at the goddamn big picture. Start thinking ahead 5 years. Sorry for the rant.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ontario,Ca
Age: 52
Posts: 274
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Tough cal, I wanna go with OT since I just watched the sanfrancisco game again, and Jason got harrased all game, but I cant see spending a 1st Round #13 pick on a guy that wont start from day 1....so OLB, then OT,DE
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
My somewhat educated guess says if the draft were today we're hoping Oher is there at #13 because that's who they want (and I approve!)
But (and this will please many people here) they also like Alex Mack a lot. And if Oher isn't there they would be looking to trade down and pick up Mack and if possible probably Clay Matthews (Patriots want to trade up supposedly) Personally, as much as I like Oher I think trading down is the better option.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Quote:
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: garfield new jersey
Posts: 158
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
our OL is not that bad,but right now we do not have a OLB on the strong side that,s our weekest spot right now.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 256
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Defensive Line Coach and Wide Receiver Coach
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
This could have been mentioned already on the site but Scouts Inc has us taking Ayers @ 13 (if Jason Smith goes #1 overall) which means we pass on Oher, who falls to 21, and Rey, who falls to 26.
2009 mock draft scenario: What happens if Matthew Stafford is not No. 1 draft pick? - ESPN I think these guys must be retarded. Seriously, why bring back Wynn/Daniels if we plan to use the 13 overall on a DE? Second, our FO is high on Oher and Rey so why do we pass on them for a guy not really known/needed. Last, who hell really believes Rey falls that far? I think he falls to SD @ 16 worst case scenario.
__________________
24-34 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 559
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Quote:
__________________
Put'n bodies in motion, cuz I got the notion. Fresh for 88' you suckaz. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Glaring Need / Roster
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|