Where are the Warpathers Who Predicted a 10-6 Record?

GoSkins! · 12-31-2004, 09:57 AM

Looking back I don't think that I would have changed my preseason prediction of 9-6 or better. We are 5-9 now and could win this game. Even with a lose, I thought that we would beat the Brown, Bengals, Cowboys (one time), and Giants (both times). Brunnel cost us a few, but I saw the preseason and I really don't think that Ramsey was ready for Gibbs system early in the year. Unfortunatley, Brunnel wasn't ready for any system. OK, with the games that we did win, and the games I expected to win, we would be 9-6. Any upsets (Packers, Viks, Ravens) would put us at 10 or more wins.

One thing that would have helped us would have been to play some of the really tough games early in the year (Pittsburg, Philly) to give Gibbs a little trial by fire.

We were in every game this year and except for a couple of games, a couple of penalties or plays would have changed the outcome of the game and we would be going to the playoffs. Even with the season going badly, I think that I feel better about the Skins than I have in a while.

skinsfanthru&thru · 12-31-2004, 10:52 AM

I believe I had the skins having atleast a 10-6 record, if not better, but I never thought in a million years that any professional qb with the production Mark Brunnel has had could play so terribly. Injuries and blown calls were out of the hands of the team but the pathetic playcalling and clock management was a problem all season long. I don't think it's as ludicrious(Sp?) as some people are making it seem to try and upgrade at a couple positions on the offense if it's possible because the offense was our obvious achilles heel. Whether it be a more modern offensive cordinator or a playmaking wr or an upgrade or 2 on the o-line or not handing the starting qb job to a player that hasn't truly shown that he is deserving of a 100% gurantee of said job next season, something needs to be done to the offense and hoping that another year with the same players under the same system will make it all better is highly unlikely. I also remember I was one of the few people before the beginning of the season who said Greg Williams could take the players we have on defense and make it a pretty darn good one, and he did it without any super stud d-lineman(although if griffin plays like this next year, he'll move into that category) and 2 of our best linebackers. I love Smoot and hope that he stays, but from the rumors about what he's asking for, nobody can be making it seem like Gibbs and Snyder are the only ones who might be a little less than comprimising.
Sure some people are taking their fantasy fix up job of the team to a bit of an extreme but all of us just want the team to be better practically by any way possible.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 12-31-2004, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoSkins!

We were in every game this year and except for a couple of games, a couple of penalties or plays would have changed the outcome of the game and we would be going to the playoffs. Even with the season going badly, I think that I feel better about the Skins than I have in a while.

So if we were just a few plays away from a completely different record, is it wise to dismantle the offense?

sportscurmudgeon · 12-31-2004, 02:12 PM

Ramseyfan:

Tony Kornheiser had it right when he wrote about how silly it was for Skins' fans to delude themselves into believing that the offense was just ever so short of being able to have this team in the playoffs. As he said, "if the Skins had scored 20 point per game..." is like saying " if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a bicycle". Then he said the simplest and most profound thing of all:

The Redskins did not score 20 points in any game - save one now - because they weren't able to do it. Not being able to do it means they are not good enough to do it. They were TRYING to score and the defenses they played were able to prevent them from doing it. That means:

The 2004 Washington Redskins' offense is not good enough to be carried forward into 2005. That will give you the same results.

The Ravens won a Super Bowl with a great defense. The Bucs won a Super Bowl with a great defense. The Panthers got to the Super Bowl with a great defense. But all of those teams had offenses that although they were below average, they were still good enough to score sufficient points to be able to utilize the defensive strengths of the team.

The 2004 Washington Redskins' offense played with a defense that was in the top 5 in the league all year long but the offense could not muster enough points to win all the games when the defense held the opponent under 14 points. The word you are looking for to describe such an offesne is:

a. substandard
b. unacceptable
c. insufficient
d. incapable

or my favorite:

e. all of the above

celts32 · 12-31-2004, 09:39 AM

I thought 9-7 but figured that 1 game plus or minus was a possibility. 5-11 never entered my mind. I think if we were all told in August that we would have the #2 defense in the league we would have spent the last few months trying to get our hands on Super Bowl tickets...

celts32 · 12-31-2004, 09:46 AM

To respond to the rest of your email, I do not want this team dismantled. The only rant I fess up to is that I do want Coles replaced as the #1 WR and if I end up wrong on that i will admit it. I want few additions elsewhere except in the offensive line and defensive line. I would like the Skins to have Mike Williams, but if they can get a dominating lineman instead I will be happy as a pig in sh*t with that...

IMO perhaps the biggest need on the team is a new starting center, but they are generally drafted much lower than the top 10 of round #1. And I agree that if you gave Greg Williams a dominant pass rushing end the results could be devastating for the rest of the NFC East...

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 12-31-2004, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celts32

To respond to the rest of your email, I do not want this team dismantled. The only rant I fess up to is that I do want Coles replaced as the #1 WR and if I end up wrong on that i will admit it. I want few additions elsewhere except in the offensive line and defensive line. I would like the Skins to have Mike Williams, but if they can get a dominating lineman instead I will be happy as a pig in sh*t with that...

IMO perhaps the biggest need on the team is a new starting center, but they are generally drafted much lower than the top 10 of round #1. And I agree that if you gave Greg Williams a dominant pass rushing end the results could be devastating for the rest of the NFC East...

I definately agree with you about the new center. Fair enough re: Coles. I can understand why people want help at WR, I just strongly disagree with that.

RedskinRat · 12-31-2004, 11:31 AM

I was one who thought we'd be better than 10-6. Why, are you handing out demerits?

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 12-31-2004, 02:00 PM

I don't talk about things in black and white like a moron hurrykaine. You are the one who said I was a salary cap doomsdayer (talk about black and white).

I don't understand how the salary cap affects our ability to sign free agents, but it doesn't affect our ability to re-sign players. You have some splaining to do hurrykaine.

MTK · 12-31-2004, 02:03 PM

yeah you kinda lost me on your cap math, hurrykaine.

We can't pursue Freeney, but we can sign a #1 pick, our own free agents, and a couple of FA lineman?

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 12-31-2004, 02:35 PM

The offense certainly was awful SC. I don't differ with you on that point. I don't think the offense is as bad as people think. I think a few small roster changes and a few changes to the playbook (not philosophy) will result in dramatic improvements.

monk81 · 01-02-2005, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramseyfan

The offense certainly was awful SC. I don't differ with you on that point. I don't think the offense is as bad as people think. I think a few small roster changes and a few changes to the playbook (not philosophy) will result in dramatic improvements.

I agree not a dismantling just a tweaking of personnel on offense and the return of a healthy Jansen will help tremendously......I think we need a new center.......and for how long can you rely on 42 year old lineman Ray Brown....I think we need to cut Gardner and draft a WR AFTER a DE and upgrading the line...........Gibbs opened it up against the Vikings and I think this is a taste of good things to come in 2005!

MTK · 01-02-2005, 02:48 PM

We're definitely not going to blow up the offensive personnel, we've made some gradual progress over the course of the season and we just need to add a few guys here and there, tweak the offensive schemes and continue to grow next year.

12-31-2004, 02:12 PM	#4
sportscurmudgeon Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,159	Ramseyfan: Tony Kornheiser had it right when he wrote about how silly it was for Skins' fans to delude themselves into believing that the offense was just ever so short of being able to have this team in the playoffs. As he said, "if the Skins had scored 20 point per game..." is like saying " if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a bicycle". Then he said the simplest and most profound thing of all: The Redskins did not score 20 points in any game - save one now - because they weren't able to do it. Not being able to do it means they are not good enough to do it. They were TRYING to score and the defenses they played were able to prevent them from doing it. That means: The 2004 Washington Redskins' offense is not good enough to be carried forward into 2005. That will give you the same results. The Ravens won a Super Bowl with a great defense. The Bucs won a Super Bowl with a great defense. The Panthers got to the Super Bowl with a great defense. But all of those teams had offenses that although they were below average, they were still good enough to score sufficient points to be able to utilize the defensive strengths of the team. The 2004 Washington Redskins' offense played with a defense that was in the top 5 in the league all year long but the offense could not muster enough points to win all the games when the defense held the opponent under 14 points. The word you are looking for to describe such an offesne is: a. substandard b. unacceptable c. insufficient d. incapable or my favorite: e. all of the above __________________ The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports...

12-31-2004, 09:57 AM	#1
GoSkins! The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Yorktown, Va Age: 56 Posts: 1,587	Looking back I don't think that I would have changed my preseason prediction of 9-6 or better. We are 5-9 now and could win this game. Even with a lose, I thought that we would beat the Brown, Bengals, Cowboys (one time), and Giants (both times). Brunnel cost us a few, but I saw the preseason and I really don't think that Ramsey was ready for Gibbs system early in the year. Unfortunatley, Brunnel wasn't ready for any system. OK, with the games that we did win, and the games I expected to win, we would be 9-6. Any upsets (Packers, Viks, Ravens) would put us at 10 or more wins. One thing that would have helped us would have been to play some of the really tough games early in the year (Pittsburg, Philly) to give Gibbs a little trial by fire. We were in every game this year and except for a couple of games, a couple of penalties or plays would have changed the outcome of the game and we would be going to the playoffs. Even with the season going badly, I think that I feel better about the Skins than I have in a while. __________________ Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien

12-31-2004, 10:52 AM	#2
skinsfanthru&thru Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 45 Posts: 3,814	I believe I had the skins having atleast a 10-6 record, if not better, but I never thought in a million years that any professional qb with the production Mark Brunnel has had could play so terribly. Injuries and blown calls were out of the hands of the team but the pathetic playcalling and clock management was a problem all season long. I don't think it's as ludicrious(Sp?) as some people are making it seem to try and upgrade at a couple positions on the offense if it's possible because the offense was our obvious achilles heel. Whether it be a more modern offensive cordinator or a playmaking wr or an upgrade or 2 on the o-line or not handing the starting qb job to a player that hasn't truly shown that he is deserving of a 100% gurantee of said job next season, something needs to be done to the offense and hoping that another year with the same players under the same system will make it all better is highly unlikely. I also remember I was one of the few people before the beginning of the season who said Greg Williams could take the players we have on defense and make it a pretty darn good one, and he did it without any super stud d-lineman(although if griffin plays like this next year, he'll move into that category) and 2 of our best linebackers. I love Smoot and hope that he stays, but from the rumors about what he's asking for, nobody can be making it seem like Gibbs and Snyder are the only ones who might be a little less than comprimising. Sure some people are taking their fantasy fix up job of the team to a bit of an extreme but all of us just want the team to be better practically by any way possible.

12-31-2004, 09:39 AM	#5
celts32 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Hackettstown NJ Age: 54 Posts: 2,665	I thought 9-7 but figured that 1 game plus or minus was a possibility. 5-11 never entered my mind. I think if we were all told in August that we would have the #2 defense in the league we would have spent the last few months trying to get our hands on Super Bowl tickets...

12-31-2004, 09:46 AM	#6
celts32 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Hackettstown NJ Age: 54 Posts: 2,665	To respond to the rest of your email, I do not want this team dismantled. The only rant I fess up to is that I do want Coles replaced as the #1 WR and if I end up wrong on that i will admit it. I want few additions elsewhere except in the offensive line and defensive line. I would like the Skins to have Mike Williams, but if they can get a dominating lineman instead I will be happy as a pig in sh*t with that... IMO perhaps the biggest need on the team is a new starting center, but they are generally drafted much lower than the top 10 of round #1. And I agree that if you gave Greg Williams a dominant pass rushing end the results could be devastating for the rest of the NFC East...

12-31-2004, 11:31 AM	#8
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	I was one who thought we'd be better than 10-6. Why, are you handing out demerits?

12-31-2004, 02:00 PM	#9
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 8,317	I don't talk about things in black and white like a moron hurrykaine. You are the one who said I was a salary cap doomsdayer (talk about black and white). I don't understand how the salary cap affects our ability to sign free agents, but it doesn't affect our ability to re-sign players. You have some splaining to do hurrykaine.

12-31-2004, 02:03 PM	#10
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,832	yeah you kinda lost me on your cap math, hurrykaine. We can't pursue Freeney, but we can sign a #1 pick, our own free agents, and a couple of FA lineman?

12-31-2004, 02:35 PM	#11
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 8,317	The offense certainly was awful SC. I don't differ with you on that point. I don't think the offense is as bad as people think. I think a few small roster changes and a few changes to the playbook (not philosophy) will result in dramatic improvements.

01-02-2005, 02:48 PM	#13
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,832	We're definitely not going to blow up the offensive personnel, we've made some gradual progress over the course of the season and we just need to add a few guys here and there, tweak the offensive schemes and continue to grow next year.

Where are the Warpathers Who Predicted a 10-6 Record?

Locker Room Main Forum