![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 1,022
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
Quote:
__________________
"Not only do you get a 1st down, but you get a whole new set of downs" John Madden |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
I hope we win Sunday I live in Charlotte and I am going to the game!!!! Get rid of Betts, Rock, Smoot, Rabach, Daniels, Wynn. 1st round RB u need atleast two. 2nd round LB. 3rd round Jarmon. 4th round OG. 5th round OG. 6th and 7th best available. Lets wait til after the Eagles then start whining.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
I would cut Portis first. If 2010 is uncapped they need to take advantage of it and cut every player they have with a bad contract. This CBA mess could be a real advantage to the Redskins in terms of fixing thier salary cap. Its a real opportunity for the next coach to start with a clean slate. I really hope thats the way they look at it as opposed to trying to load up for a half assed title run.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
I know this thread isn't supposed to account for salary cap issues, but celts raises a very good point. We need to take advantage of an uncapped 2010.
- Andre Carter - Orakpo needs to move to the full time RDE, forget the SLB. Carter may have some trade value for a draft pick. - Randy Thomas - Injuries have taken their toll. We must dump his contract in the uncapped year. - Portis - Others have metnioned several good reasons, plus I can think of $10M more. - Todd Collins - Weak armed game managers don't get paid $ 3.5M / yr. - Betts - no production, no upside. - Davis - I think this guy has potential, but unless we have a coaching change that's going to employ a ton of 2TE sets and actually get the second TE the ball, Davis is a waste. He has trade value, get a pick for him. - Cartwright - no production - Daniels - old, slow - Colt Brennan - the Cult was fun for a while, but getting outplayed by a 5' 10" rookie says it all. - Moss - but only in a trade for at least a 2nd round pick. He can still be productive. - Smoot - slow, major liability in man coverage. - ARE - $ 5M / yr. is way too much for a 3rd or fourth receiver that has no value in the return game I'm holding on to Landry. The point about him missing tackles is fair. The point about GW mentioning he was a sure tackler is also a valid point. Why the contradiction? Landry is a good tackler near the LoS, not particluarly good in space, IMO. The jury is currently deliberating on JC. We'll find out over the next few weeks. If he continues the same level of play as the last two weeks, he will need to go and will likely have very little or no value. Even if JC goes, IMO it is time to find a replacement for Samuels in the first round of the 2010 draft. He's slowing down and is getting beaten more frequently off the edge. Rabach will be serviceable for another year, Rinehart, Heyer, Dock should be fine. If we're able to get a high caliber LT, Samuels should be shopped after the pick.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
Quote:
Yeah I have to agree with you on all the above, even Colt. Why we released Daniel and kept Colt was moronic, but it is all a moot issue now. Brennan was a late rounder for a reason. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,022
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
So you guys want to basically fire everyone, cut everyone, trade everyone but will be bitching and complaining about how badly we suck again. Odd.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
Fire everyone? No...i would settle for just Vinny.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
i think it depends on if you believe we are closer to success than failure. Personally, I don't think we're "one or two guys" away from being a contender. I think you need a certain culture to consistently win and we have some players that need to go in order for that to happen. To me, model franchises are Pats, Chargers, Eagles(just threw up in my mouth) and Steelers. What they have in common is that one player is never bigger than the team, they build wisely through the draft and they don't sentimentally hang on to players. It hasn't wo the Chargers or Eagles a superbowl, but they've been quality teams now for what, last 5-6 years? I'd take that over this clusterfuck any day.
__________________
"All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit." Thomas Paine |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
Atleast if we suck we'll have a reason to know why. Plus we will know the team is building continuity with no name players vs. primidona's.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
Would love to go after Marcus McNeil.
A new cult will start in 2010 with Colt...McCoy
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
I can't believe everyone is so quick to piss on the only guy to beat the Giants, Todd Collins.
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 60
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Who would you get rid of for 2010?
Quote:
And McNeil would be an instant replacement over CS, not so sure SD wouldn't like to retain his services.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|