Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Your opinion of the Redskins new approach to free agency?
Thumbs up 99 92.52%
Thumbs down 8 7.48%
Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2010, 10:38 AM   #1
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Pretty much. Even though we finished 4-12, I too think we're probably more like an 8-8 team. That's the great deception with this squad, we're really not that bad.

And as it's been stated here as well as other threads, there weren't a ton of quality free agents out there, unless you're giving up a top tier pick. Take the Bears for instance, they're not rebuilding they're trying to save face and a few asses.

Two people, among a few others, that I feel will be key to how far we go this year will Jason Campbell, for obvious reasons, and Levi Jones. He's the big wild card I'm counting on. If this guy can kill it in training camp and just become NFL starting material, I think we're on our way. Chad Rinehart, eh? I don't know, he should improve but I'm counting on Levi to step up more than Chad, although I'd be happy with either doing a good job.
Fill me in on the status of Levi Jones. He's still listed on the roster, but is he currently under contract or is he an URFA?
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 10:46 AM   #2
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
Fill me in on the status of Levi Jones. He's still listed on the roster, but is he currently under contract or is he an URFA?
All I know is he signed a FA contract last year. I'm not sure if the Skins have decided to keep him or what, to be honest. I'd like to see him back in camp and competing for a starting spot at tackle.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 11:17 AM   #3
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
Fill me in on the status of Levi Jones. He's still listed on the roster, but is he currently under contract or is he an URFA?
That's what I'm wondering too, what is the deal w/Levi? Is he under contract? If not, it seems we would've heard something.

I know he said he wanted to play LT last year & waited for a team to sign him to do so, but he might want to consider playing RT at this point in his career. He seems like the athletic kind of linemen that would do well in Shanny's scheme.

Anyone have info?
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 10:25 PM   #4
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

This threads different then all the other new threads(Parker/Portis combo, WR/KR) that could have been discussed in the free agency mash-up Gtripp created.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 10:26 PM   #5
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

I'm sure they're expecting more cuts and maybe some better players to become available. Rosters will change before the season starts.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 10:26 PM   #6
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

People are spoiled when they have big incomes and would wreak every firm on the planet if they had their way. Rather than make optimal decisions and try to drive down the cost of production, they rather throw money away for inputs(labor) that won't be lasting long ANYWAY. It's like paying "brand-new" price for factory equipment that's been used for 10 years.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 10:30 PM   #7
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

^ good point
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 10:32 PM   #8
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

You know whose fans are like this most offseasons, the colts, chargers, vikings, saints, steelers, cardinals, ravens...you see a trend here.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 10:44 PM   #9
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

I don't think gun shy is the word. I'd say prudent is more like it. With all the tenders around the league, many of the "available" players would cost us a pretty penny in draft picks. I for one am happy with the way things are going thus far. I would have liked us to make a move for Dansby, but that's pretty much it as far as the big name FA's.

I think we're so accustomed to the same ridiculous spending season after season that we just feel weird when we act like most of the other teams around the league.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 10:44 PM   #10
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

Gun shy?

Allen and Shanahan have both been around the block a few times, pretty sure they know what they are doing.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 10:59 PM   #11
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

It will take a couple of years (at least) for the new regime to overhaul the roster. We fans might as well be patient, grab some snacks, and enjoy the slow ride.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 01:14 AM   #12
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

Thread needs to be retitled to something like "Thoughts on the new front office strategy." Asking if the front office is gun shy is to much of a leading question and something I'd expect from another Redskin fan site.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Mass amounts of Redskins fans are having to kick their "Vinny Crack" addictions this year of 2010 free agency.
People don't realize that Vinny was basically, well....us, for lack of a better word. If you took your traditional Madden franchise owner and gave him a GM job, he'd be Vinny. Trading away draft picks, throwing money at players, ignoring the O-Line because the speed of your running back is 100 times more important, etc.

And keep in mind this so called frugality might be short lived Apparently (God I can't believe I'm about to say this) next years (ow) free agent class (owwww) is going to be better (*bang*).

Still it's a smart strategy. Last I heard we might be as much as $29 million under what would have been the 2010 salary cap. I also heard someone else point out that we're not paying outsiders more then the guys already on our team that did their jobs, rather then paying them more because they happened to hit free agency at the right time. I admit if they acted like this all the time it might get annoying, especially without the wins to back it up, but for now it's a breath of fresh air.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
HE ONLY DID IT CUZ HE LOVES US!!lc
WE'RE NOTHING WITHOUT HIM!!!!
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 08:20 PM   #13
Warpath
The Starter
 
Warpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 1,762
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

Thumbs up, Im here for the long haul, so lets build a sustainable team for years to come.
Warpath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 11:14 PM   #14
Player_HTTR
Special Teams
 
Player_HTTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 328
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

Per John Clayton:

Quote:
The Redskins dropped $63 million of dead salary cap pro-ration with the retirement of Chris Samuel and the releases of veterans Rock Cartwright, Todd Collins, Randy Thomas, Latrell Betts, Cornelius Griffin, Antwaan Randle-El and cornerback Fred Smoot. If there were a $123 million salary cap, the Redskins would have been $39 million over the cap after those transactions. For cash, the Redskins cut their payroll to $70.6 million, fourth-lowest in the league. Knowing Snyder, that number will grow.
The FO has a plan and it looks like its take more into account than how fast ink takes to dry. To me it looks like they are making moves for the future. I don't care if there's a cap or not, fiscal responsibility is much more important after seeing all the empty seats in FedEx this year. A couple million here and there for mediocre/stopgap players will limit what we will spend when some one we want/really need does come along. Like a few others said earlier the skilled FAs are older than what we need to reload, or whatever you want to call it.
Player_HTTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 11:34 PM   #15
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?

There really isn't much quality available out there. Do you want the Skins to sign players just for the sake of keeping up with the Joneses? This is what should have been done in the last 10 years.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.50921 seconds with 12 queries