|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
04-14-2005, 11:50 AM
|
#1 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 293
|
Re: Skins Re-sign the Rock
SKINZ DOMIN8...Obviously you don't understand the improtance of DEPTH on a roster.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2005, 01:40 PM
|
#2 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 66
|
Re: Skins Re-sign the Rock
Come on, who doesn't like Rock. And seriously, you're going to bitch about our third-string back? Get real, Rock rules.
|
|
|
|
|
04-21-2005, 04:34 AM
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Skins Re-sign the Rock
rock has the best football name on the team... the only one that tops it (off the top of my head) is joe washington... or possibly dick butkus
 _
|
|
|
|
|
04-21-2005, 10:52 AM
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: Skins Re-sign the Rock
Let me suggest - ever so gently of course - that the appearance of a thread on a Redskins' website announcing and praising and glorying in the resigning of a never-used running back who is also a good-but-not-outstanding kick coverage team member MIGHT be considered overhyping.
Rock Cartwright will not embarrass the Redskins if they keep him on special teams; he hustles and works hard. By the same token, if the Redskins make the playoffs and win a game in the playoffs this year, it will not be on the basis of a season-long monumental effort on Cartwright's part. His signing may make some folks here feel good but it is inconsequential.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
|
|
|
|
04-21-2005, 10:54 AM
|
#5 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Skins Re-sign the Rock
LOL Welcome back...
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
